Security News
Fragmented access policies are top security concern in multi-cloud environments, with more than 75% of enterprises reporting they do not know where applications are deployed and who has access to them, according to Strata Identity. "More identity systems are being used to manage users, and organizations are losing visibility and control over their identities and access policies. So improvements in identity infrastructure intended to drive an improvement in an enterprise's cybersecurity posture have caused the opposite effect leading to complexity overload," said Michael Sampson, principal analyst for Osterman Research.
Json from CRED FILE NAMES file name array to GCLOUD CREDS FILES file name array[+] added netrc, kubeconfig, adc. Db from CRED FILE NAMES file name array[-] removed dload function[+] added commented dload function invocation for posting final results[+] added commented wget command to download and execute https://everlost.
Visibility into the security posture is critical for staying ahead of the cloud attackers due to the nature of cloud infrastructure. Security mechanisms are usually designed to address security issues in specific technologies.
With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, cloud security posture management features are now available for Google Cloud Platform, as well as AWS and Azure. Almost 90% of enterprises use more than one public cloud provider, according to Flexera's 2023 State of the Cloud survey.
With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, cloud security posture management features are now available for Google Cloud Platform, as well as AWS and Azure. Almost 90% of enterprises use more than one public cloud provider, according to Flexera's 2023 State of the Cloud survey.
Qualys report looks at how misconfiguration issues on cloud service providers help attackers gain access. Cloud misconfiguration - incorrect control settings applied to both hardware and software elements in the cloud - are threat vectors that amplify the risk of data breaches.
Ermetic released CNAPPgoat, an open-source project that allows organizations to test their cloud security skills, processes, tools, and posture in interactive sandbox environments that are easy to deploy and destroy. CNAPPgoat supports AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms for assessing the security capabilities included in Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms.
This race to innovate is exposing organizations to cloud blind spots; many are now operating across a mix of cloud architectures, using different tools, and requiring different skills, which is leaving behind a trail of security gaps. One of the most common pitfalls we encounter in cloud security is the tendency to pursue a "Lift and shift" approach; firms will simply transfer their existing on-premises security processes to the cloud wholesale.
As a result, security is an afterthought, and any attempt to squeeze siloed security into agile SDLC can swell the cost of patching by 600%. A new cloud security operating model is long overdue. Stripping back to a system of low context may have drastically sped up the CI/CD pipeline, but this low-context approach is disappointing for any attempt to shift security to the left.
Infosec in brief A security weakness in Google Cloud Build could have allowed attackers to tamper with organizations' code repositories and application images, according to Orca Security researchers. The issue, as Google describes it, is more about poorly defined permissions.