Vulnerabilities > Google > Chrome > 1.0.154.36
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2009-08-31 | CVE-2009-3011 | Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Google Chrome Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 and earlier, 2.0.172.28, 2.0.172.37, and 3.0.193.2 Beta does not properly block data: URIs in Refresh headers in HTTP responses, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via vectors related to (1) injecting a Refresh header that contains JavaScript sequences in a data:text/html URI or (2) entering a data:text/html URI with JavaScript sequences when specifying the content of a Refresh header. | 4.3 |
2009-08-27 | CVE-2009-2974 | Denial-Of-Service vulnerability in Chrome Google Chrome 1.0.154.65, 1.0.154.48, and earlier allows remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (application hang) via vectors involving a chromehtml: URI value for the document.location property or (2) cause a denial of service (application hang and CPU consumption) via vectors involving a series of function calls that set a chromehtml: URI value for the document.location property. | 5.0 |
2009-08-27 | CVE-2009-2973 | Cryptographic Issues vulnerability in Google Chrome Google Chrome before 2.0.172.43 does not prevent SSL connections to a site with an X.509 certificate signed with the (1) MD2 or (2) MD4 algorithm, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary HTTPS servers via a crafted certificate, a related issue to CVE-2009-2409. | 6.4 |
2009-08-27 | CVE-2009-2935 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in Google Chrome Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 2.0.172.43, allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions on reading memory, and possibly obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code in the Chrome sandbox, via crafted JavaScript. | 10.0 |
2009-08-24 | CVE-2009-2955 | Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Google Chrome Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption and application hang) via JavaScript code with a long string value for the hash property (aka location.hash), a related issue to CVE-2008-5715. | 5.0 |
2009-08-11 | CVE-2009-2416 | Use After Free vulnerability in multiple products Multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities in libxml2 2.5.10, 2.6.16, 2.6.26, 2.6.27, and 2.6.32, and libxml 1.8.17, allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted (1) Notation or (2) Enumeration attribute types in an XML file, as demonstrated by the Codenomicon XML fuzzing framework. | 6.5 |
2009-07-21 | CVE-2009-2556 | Improper Restriction of Operations Within the Bounds of A Memory Buffer vulnerability in Google Chrome Google Chrome before 2.0.172.37 allows attackers to leverage renderer access to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger excessive memory allocation. | 9.3 |
2009-07-21 | CVE-2009-2555 | Improper Restriction of Operations Within the Bounds of A Memory Buffer vulnerability in Google Chrome and V8 Heap-based buffer overflow in src/jsregexp.cc in Google V8 before 1.1.10.14, as used in Google Chrome before 2.0.172.37, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the Chrome sandbox via a crafted JavaScript regular expression. | 9.3 |
2009-07-07 | CVE-2009-2352 | Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Google Chrome Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 and earlier does not block javascript: URIs in Refresh headers in HTTP responses, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via vectors related to (1) injecting a Refresh header or (2) specifying the content of a Refresh header, a related issue to CVE-2009-1312. | 4.3 |
2009-06-23 | CVE-2009-2121 | Improper Restriction of Operations Within the Bounds of A Memory Buffer vulnerability in Google Chrome Buffer overflow in the browser kernel in Google Chrome before 2.0.172.33 allows remote HTTP servers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted response. | 9.3 |