Vulnerabilities > CVE-2014-8680 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in ISC Bind 9.10.0/9.10.1

047910
CVSS 5.4 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
HIGH
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
NONE
Availability impact
COMPLETE
network
high complexity
isc
CWE-20
nessus

Summary

The GeoIP functionality in ISC BIND 9.10.0 through 9.10.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and named exit) via vectors related to (1) the lack of GeoIP databases for both IPv4 and IPv6, or (2) IPv6 support with certain options.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Isc
2

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Nessus

  • NASL familyGentoo Local Security Checks
    NASL idGENTOO_GLSA-201502-03.NASL
    descriptionThe remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-201502-03 (BIND: Multiple Vulnerabilities) Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in BIND. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact : A remote attacker can cause a denial of service condition by the lack of GeoIP databases, or via a large or infinite number of referrals. Workaround : There is no known workaround at this time.
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id81226
    published2015-02-09
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2015-2018 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/81226
    titleGLSA-201502-03 : BIND: Multiple Vulnerabilities
  • NASL familyDNS
    NASL idBIND9_9101_P1.NASL
    descriptionAccording to its self-reported version number, the remote installation of BIND is affected by multiple denial of service vulnerabilities : - A flaw exists within the Domain Name Service due to an error in the code used to follow delegations. A remote attacker, with a maliciously-constructed zone or query, could potentially cause the service to issue unlimited queries leading to resource exhaustion. (CVE-2014-8500) - Multiple flaws exist with the GeoIP feature. These flaws could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. Note these issues only affect the 9.10.x branch. (CVE-2014-8680) Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id79861
    published2014-12-12
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2014-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/79861
    titleISC BIND 9 Multiple DoS Vulnerabilities
  • NASL familySlackware Local Security Checks
    NASL idSLACKWARE_SSA_2015-111-01.NASL
    descriptionNew bind packages are available for Slackware 13.0, 13.1, 13.37, 14.0, 14.1, and -current to fix security issues.
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id82914
    published2015-04-22
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2015-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/82914
    titleSlackware 13.0 / 13.1 / 13.37 / 14.0 / 14.1 / current : bind (SSA:2015-111-01)
  • NASL familyFreeBSD Local Security Checks
    NASL idFREEBSD_PKG_AB3E98D9817511E4907DD050992ECDE8.NASL
    descriptionISC reports : We have today posted updated versions of 9.9.6 and 9.10.1 to address a significant security vulnerability in DNS resolution. The flaw was discovered by Florian Maury of ANSSI, and applies to any recursive resolver that does not support a limit on the number of recursions. [CERTFR-2014-AVI-512], [USCERT VU#264212] A flaw in delegation handling could be exploited to put named into an infinite loop, in which each lookup of a name server triggered additional lookups of more name servers. This has been addressed by placing limits on the number of levels of recursion named will allow (default 7), and on the number of queries that it will send before terminating a recursive query (default 50). The recursion depth limit is configured via the max-recursion-depth option, and the query limit via the max-recursion-queries option. For more information, see the security advisory at https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01216/. [CVE-2014-8500] [RT #37580] In addition, we have also corrected a potential security vulnerability in the GeoIP feature in the 9.10.1 release only. For more information on this issue, see the security advisory at https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01217. [CVE-2014-8680]
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id79957
    published2014-12-15
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2014-2018 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/79957
    titleFreeBSD : bind -- denial of service vulnerability (ab3e98d9-8175-11e4-907d-d050992ecde8)
  • NASL familyDNS
    NASL idBIND9_9102_RC2.NASL
    descriptionAccording to its self-reported version number, the remote installation of BIND is potentially affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - A flaw exists within the Domain Name Service due to an error in the code used to follow delegations. A remote attacker, with a maliciously-constructed zone or query, can cause the service to issue unlimited queries, resulting in resource exhaustion. (CVE-2014-8500) - Multiple flaws exist with GeoIP functionality. These flaws allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. Note that these issues only affect the 9.10.x branch. (CVE-2014-8680) - A denial of service vulnerability exists due to an error relating to DNSSEC validation and the managed-keys feature. A remote attacker can trigger an incorrect trust-anchor management scenario in which no key is ready for use, resulting in an assertion failure and daemon crash. (CVE-2015-1349) - An error exists related to handling the
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id81487
    published2015-02-24
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2015-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/81487
    titleISC BIND 9.10.2 < 9.10.2rc2 Multiple Vulnerabilities