Vulnerabilities > Redhat > Directory Server
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2011-02-23 | CVE-2011-0532 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in multiple products The (1) backup and restore scripts, (2) main initialization script, and (3) ldap-agent script in 389 Directory Server 1.2.x (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x) place a zero-length directory name in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse shared library in the current working directory. | 6.2 |
2011-02-23 | CVE-2011-0022 | Resource Management Errors vulnerability in multiple products The setup scripts in 389 Directory Server 1.2.x (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x), when multiple unprivileged instances are configured, use 0777 permissions for the /var/run/dirsrv directory, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (daemon outage or arbitrary process termination) by replacing PID files contained in this directory. | 4.7 |
2011-02-23 | CVE-2011-0019 | Improper Input Validation vulnerability in multiple products slapd (aka ns-slapd) in 389 Directory Server 1.2.7.5 (aka Red Hat Directory Server 8.2.x or dirsrv) does not properly handle simple paged result searches, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via multiple search requests. | 7.5 |
2010-08-17 | CVE-2010-2241 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in Redhat Directory Server 8.0/8.1 The (1) setup-ds.pl and (2) setup-ds-admin.pl setup scripts for Red Hat Directory Server 8 before 8.2 use world-readable permissions when creating cache files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information including passwords for Directory and Administration Server administrative accounts. | 2.1 |
2008-08-29 | CVE-2008-3283 | Resource Management Errors vulnerability in multiple products Multiple memory leaks in Red Hat Directory Server 7.1 before SP7, Red Hat Directory Server 8, and Fedora Directory Server 1.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via vectors involving (1) the authentication / bind phase and (2) anonymous LDAP search requests. | 7.8 |
2008-08-29 | CVE-2008-2930 | Resource Management Errors vulnerability in multiple products Red Hat Directory Server 7.1 before SP7, Red Hat Directory Server 8, and Fedora Directory Server 1.1.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption and search outage) via crafted LDAP search requests with patterns, related to a single-threaded regular-expression subsystem. | 7.1 |
2008-08-29 | CVE-2008-2929 | Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in multiple products Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the adminutil library in the Directory Server Administration Express and Directory Server Gateway (DSGW) web interface in Red Hat Directory Server 7.1 before SP7 and 8 EL4 and EL5, and Fedora Directory Server, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via input values that use % (percent) escaping. | 4.3 |
2008-08-29 | CVE-2008-2928 | Buffer Errors vulnerability in Redhat Directory Server 7.1 Multiple buffer overflows in the adminutil library in CGI applications in Red Hat Directory Server 7.1 before SP7 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Accept-Language HTTP header. | 10.0 |
2008-05-12 | CVE-2008-1677 | Classic Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Redhat Directory Server and Fedora Directory Server Buffer overflow in the regular expression handler in Red Hat Directory Server 8.0 and 7.1 before SP6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (slapd crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted LDAP query that triggers the overflow during translation to a regular expression. | 7.5 |
2008-04-16 | CVE-2008-0893 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in Redhat Directory Server 8.0 Red Hat Administration Server, as used by Red Hat Directory Server 8.0 EL4 and EL5, does not properly restrict access to CGI scripts, which allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions. | 7.5 |