Vulnerabilities > MIT > Kerberos 5 > 1.8.1
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-03-20 | CVE-2011-0284 | Resource Management Errors vulnerability in MIT Kerberos 5 Double free vulnerability in the prepare_error_as function in do_as_req.c in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7 through 1.9, when the PKINIT feature is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via an e_data field containing typed data. | 7.6 |
| 2011-02-10 | CVE-2011-0282 | Denial Of Service vulnerability in MIT Kerberos KDC Principal Name LDAP Request NULL Pointer The Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.6.x through 1.9, when an LDAP backend is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference or buffer over-read, and daemon crash) via a crafted principal name. | 5.0 |
| 2011-02-10 | CVE-2011-0281 | Cryptographic Issues vulnerability in MIT Kerberos and Kerberos 5 The unparse implementation in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.6.x through 1.9, when an LDAP backend is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file descriptor exhaustion and daemon hang) via a principal name that triggers use of a backslash escape sequence, as demonstrated by a \n sequence. | 5.0 |
| 2010-12-02 | CVE-2010-4020 | Cryptographic Issues vulnerability in MIT Kerberos 5 MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.8.x through 1.8.3 does not reject RC4 key-derivation checksums, which might allow remote authenticated users to forge a (1) AD-SIGNEDPATH or (2) AD-KDC-ISSUED signature, and possibly gain privileges, by leveraging the small key space that results from certain one-byte stream-cipher operations. | 3.5 |
| 2010-12-02 | CVE-2010-1324 | Cryptographic Issues vulnerability in MIT Kerberos 5 MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7.x and 1.8.x through 1.8.3 does not properly determine the acceptability of checksums, which might allow remote attackers to forge GSS tokens, gain privileges, or have unspecified other impact via (1) an unkeyed checksum, (2) an unkeyed PAC checksum, or (3) a KrbFastArmoredReq checksum based on an RC4 key. | 4.3 |
| 2010-12-02 | CVE-2010-1323 | Cryptographic Issues vulnerability in MIT Kerberos and Kerberos 5 MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.3.x, 1.4.x, 1.5.x, 1.6.x, 1.7.x, and 1.8.x through 1.8.3 does not properly determine the acceptability of checksums, which might allow remote attackers to modify user-visible prompt text, modify a response to a Key Distribution Center (KDC), or forge a KRB-SAFE message via certain checksums that (1) are unkeyed or (2) use RC4 keys. | 2.6 |
| 2010-10-07 | CVE-2010-1322 | Improper Input Validation vulnerability in MIT Kerberos 5 The merge_authdata function in kdc_authdata.c in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.8.x before 1.8.4 does not properly manage an index into an authorization-data list, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash), or possibly obtain sensitive information, spoof authorization, or execute arbitrary code, via a TGS request that triggers an uninitialized pointer dereference, as demonstrated by a request from a Windows Active Directory client. | 6.5 |
| 2010-05-19 | CVE-2010-1321 | Null Pointer Dereference vulnerability in multiple products The kg_accept_krb5 function in krb5/accept_sec_context.c in the GSS-API library in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) through 1.7.1 and 1.8 before 1.8.2, as used in kadmind and other applications, does not properly check for invalid GSS-API tokens, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an AP-REQ message in which the authenticator's checksum field is missing. | 6.8 |
| 2010-04-22 | CVE-2010-1320 | Resource Management Errors vulnerability in MIT Kerberos 5 Double free vulnerability in do_tgs_req.c in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7.x and 1.8.x before 1.8.2 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a request associated with (1) renewal or (2) validation. | 4.0 |