Vulnerabilities > ISC > Bind
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2019-01-16 | CVE-2018-5734 | Reachable Assertion vulnerability in multiple products While handling a particular type of malformed packet BIND erroneously selects a SERVFAIL rcode instead of a FORMERR rcode. | 7.5 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3145 | Use After Free vulnerability in multiple products BIND was improperly sequencing cleanup operations on upstream recursion fetch contexts, leading in some cases to a use-after-free error that can trigger an assertion failure and crash in named. | 7.5 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3143 | An attacker who is able to send and receive messages to an authoritative DNS server and who has knowledge of a valid TSIG key name for the zone and service being targeted may be able to manipulate BIND into accepting an unauthorized dynamic update. | 5.9 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3142 | Improper Input Validation vulnerability in multiple products An attacker who is able to send and receive messages to an authoritative DNS server and who has knowledge of a valid TSIG key name may be able to circumvent TSIG authentication of AXFR requests via a carefully constructed request packet. | 3.7 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3141 | Unquoted Search Path or Element vulnerability in ISC Bind The BIND installer on Windows uses an unquoted service path which can enable a local user to achieve privilege escalation if the host file system permissions allow this. | 7.8 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3140 | Resource Exhaustion vulnerability in multiple products If named is configured to use Response Policy Zones (RPZ) an error processing some rule types can lead to a condition where BIND will endlessly loop while handling a query. | 5.9 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3138 | Reachable Assertion vulnerability in multiple products named contains a feature which allows operators to issue commands to a running server by communicating with the server process over a control channel, using a utility program such as rndc. | 5.3 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3137 | Reachable Assertion vulnerability in multiple products Mistaken assumptions about the ordering of records in the answer section of a response containing CNAME or DNAME resource records could lead to a situation in which named would exit with an assertion failure when processing a response in which records occurred in an unusual order. | 7.5 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3136 | Reachable Assertion vulnerability in multiple products A query with a specific set of characteristics could cause a server using DNS64 to encounter an assertion failure and terminate. | 5.9 |
2019-01-16 | CVE-2017-3135 | NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in multiple products Under some conditions when using both DNS64 and RPZ to rewrite query responses, query processing can resume in an inconsistent state leading to either an INSIST assertion failure or an attempt to read through a NULL pointer. | 5.9 |