Vulnerabilities > F5 > BIG IP Websafe > 1.0.0
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-22 | CVE-2018-5509 | Improper Input Validation vulnerability in F5 products On F5 BIG-IP versions 13.0.0 or 12.1.0 - 12.1.3.1, when a specifically configured virtual server receives traffic of an undisclosed nature, TMM will crash and take the configured failover action, potentially causing a denial of service. | 7.5 |
| 2018-03-22 | CVE-2018-5504 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 products In some circumstances, the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) does not properly handle certain malformed Websockets requests/responses, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or possible remote code execution on the F5 BIG-IP system running versions 13.0.0 - 13.1.0.3 or 12.1.0 - 12.1.3.1. | 8.1 |
| 2018-03-22 | CVE-2018-5502 | Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in F5 products On F5 BIG-IP versions 13.0.0 - 13.1.0.3, attackers may be able to disrupt services on the BIG-IP system with maliciously crafted client certificate. | 7.5 |
| 2017-10-27 | CVE-2017-6162 | Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability in F5 products In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.2, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.4.0 to 11.5.4, 11.2.1, in some cases TMM may crash when processing TCP traffic. | 5.9 |
| 2017-10-27 | CVE-2017-6159 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 products F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.2, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1 are vulnerable to a denial of service attack when the MPTCP option is enabled on a virtual server. | 5.9 |
| 2017-10-27 | CVE-2017-0303 | Incomplete Cleanup vulnerability in F5 products In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM and Websafe software version 13.0.0, 12.0.0 to 12.1.2 and 11.5.1 to 11.6.1, under limited circumstances connections handled by a Virtual Server with an associated SOCKS profile may not be properly cleaned up, potentially leading to resource starvation. | 7.5 |