Vulnerabilities > F5 > BIG IP Access Policy Manager > Medium
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-24 | CVE-2020-27726 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in F5 Big-Ip Access Policy Manager In versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, 14.1.0-14.1.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the resource information page for authenticated users when a full webtop is configured on the BIG-IP APM system. | 6.1 |
| 2020-12-24 | CVE-2020-27722 | Resource Exhaustion vulnerability in F5 Big-Ip Access Policy Manager In BIG-IP APM versions 15.0.0-15.0.1.3, 14.1.0-14.1.3, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, under certain conditions, the VDI plugin does not observe plugin flow-control protocol causing excessive resource consumption. | 6.5 |
| 2020-12-24 | CVE-2020-27719 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, and 14.1.0-14.1.3, a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. | 6.1 |
| 2020-12-24 | CVE-2020-27724 | Resource Exhaustion vulnerability in F5 Big-Ip Access Policy Manager In BIG-IP APM versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.4, 15.0.0-15.0.1.3, 14.1.0-14.1.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, on systems running more than one TMM instance, authenticated VPN users may consume excessive resources by sending specially-crafted malicious traffic over the tunnel. | 6.5 |
| 2020-11-19 | CVE-2020-5947 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 products In versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1 and 15.1.0-15.1.1, on specific BIG-IP platforms, attackers may be able to obtain TCP sequence numbers from the BIG-IP system that can be reused in future connections with the same source and destination port and IP numbers. | 4.3 |
| 2020-11-05 | CVE-2020-5943 | Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in F5 products In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. | 6.5 |
| 2020-11-05 | CVE-2020-5940 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in F5 products In versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, and 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also known as the BIG-IP Configuration utility. | 5.4 |
| 2020-10-29 | CVE-2020-5935 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP (LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, FPS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM) versions 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, when handling MQTT traffic through a BIG-IP virtual server associated with an MQTT profile and an iRule performing manipulations on that traffic, TMM may produce a core file. | 5.9 |
| 2020-10-29 | CVE-2020-5934 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 Big-Ip Access Policy Manager On BIG-IP APM 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, when multiple HTTP requests from the same client to configured SAML Single Logout (SLO) URL are passing through a TCP Keep-Alive connection, traffic to TMM can be disrupted. low complexity f5 | 6.5 |
| 2020-10-29 | CVE-2020-5938 | Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, when negotiating IPSec tunnels with configured, authenticated peers, the peer may negotiate a different key length than the BIG-IP configuration would otherwise allow. | 6.5 |