Vulnerabilities > CVE-2017-5948 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Oneplus Oxygenos

047910
CVSS 5.9 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
HIGH
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
HIGH
Availability impact
NONE
network
high complexity
oneplus
CWE-20

Summary

An issue was discovered on OnePlus One, X, 2, 3, and 3T devices. OxygenOS and HydrogenOS are vulnerable to downgrade attacks. This is due to a lenient 'updater-script' in OTAs that does not check that the current version is lower than or equal to the given image's. Downgrades can occur even on locked bootloaders and without triggering a factory reset, allowing for exploitation of now-patched vulnerabilities with access to user data. This vulnerability can be exploited by a Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) attacker targeting the update process. This is possible because the update transaction does not occur over TLS (CVE-2016-10370). In addition, a physical attacker can reboot the phone into recovery, and then use 'adb sideload' to push the OTA (on OnePlus 3/3T 'Secure Start-up' must be off).

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
OS
Oneplus
1
Hardware
Oneplus
5

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Seebug

  • bulletinFamilyexploit
    description#### Products * OnePlus 3T * OnePlus 3 * OnePlus 2 * OnePlus X * OnePlus One #### Vulnerable Version * All OnePlus OxygenOS & HydrogenOS OTAs #### Technical Details lenient updater-script in the OnePlus OTAs which does not check that the current version is lower than or equal to the given image’s (see below the 4.0.0 updater-script). Downgrades can occur even on locked bootloaders & without triggering a factory reset, allowing for exploitation of now-patched vulnerabilities with access to user data. This vulnerability can be exploited by a Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) attacker targeting the update process. This is possible because the update transaction does not occur over TLS. In addition, a physical attacker can reboot the phone into recovery, and then use adb sideload to push the OTA (on OnePlus 3/3T ‘Secure Start-up’ must be off). ``` getprop("ro.display.series") == "OnePlus 3T" || abort("E3004: This package is for \"OnePlus 3T\" devices; this is a \"" + getprop("ro.display.series") + "\"."); show_progress(0.750000, 0); ui_print("Patching system image unconditionally..."); block_image_update("/dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/system", package_extract_file("system.transfer.list"), "system.new.dat", "system.patch.dat") || abort("E1001: Failed to update system image."); show_progress(0.050000, 10); [...] ``` #### PoC ``` https://github.com/alephsecurity/research/tree/master/OnePlusOTA ``` #### Timeline * 11-May-17: Public disclosure. * 10-May-17: Deadline Extension. * 26-Apr-17: Deadline. * 09-Apr-17: 14-day Deadline Extension Offered (no reply). * 01-Mar-17: Added as ALEPH-2017008. * 10-Feb-17: CVE-2017-5948 assigned. * 09-Feb-17: CVE ID requested. * 26-Jan-17: Reported.
    idSSV:93106
    last seen2017-11-19
    modified2017-05-12
    published2017-05-12
    reporterRoot
    titleOnePlus OTA Downgrade Vulnerability(CVE-2017-5948)
  • bulletinFamilyexploit
    description#### Summary The OnePlus OTA Updater pushes the signed-OTA image over HTTP without TLS. While it does not allow for installation of arbitrary OTAs (due to the digital signature), it unnecessarily increases the attack surface, and allows for remote exploitation of other vulnerabilities such as CVE-2017-5948, CVE-2017-8850 & CVE-2017-8851. #### Technical Details OxygenOS & HydrogenOS send the following JSON request to `http://otac.h2os.com/post/Query_Update` or to `http://i.ota.coloros.com/post/Query_Update` in order to check if a new OTA is available: ``` { "beta": "0", "imei": "<IMEI>", "isOnePlus": "1", "language": "en", "mobile": "ONEPLUS A3010", "mode": "0", "ota_version": "<CURRENT_VERSION>", "type": "1", "version": "1" } ``` For example, on a OnePlus 3T device running OxygenOS 4.1.1 this results in the following response, announcing that a 4.1.3 OTA is available: ``` { "active_url": "http://otafsc1.h2os.com/patch/amazone2/GLO/OnePlus3TOxygen/OnePlus3TOxygen_28.A.51_GLO_051_1704112011/OnePlus3TOxygen_28_OTA_051_all_1704112011_d6f79637e1c.zip", "description": "https://otafsc.h2os.com/html/GLO/OnePlus3TOxygen/OnePlus3TOxygen_28.A.51_GLO_051_1704112011_version_EN_1492072442240.html", "down_url": "http://otafsc.h2os.com/patch/amazone2/GLO/OnePlus3TOxygen/OnePlus3TOxygen_28.A.51_GLO_051_1704112011/OnePlus3TOxygen_28_OTA_051_all_1704112011_d6f79637e1c.zip", "extract": "#OS Version: OnePlus3TOxygen_28_170411\n##WHAT'S NEW\n\\\n\u2022 Upgraded Android 7.1.1 \n\\\n\u2022 Added expanded screenshots \n\\\n\u2022 Improved picture taking of moving objects\n with blur reduction \n\\\n\u2022 Improved video stability when recording\n\\\n\u2022 Improved WiFI connectivity \u00a0\n\\\n\u2022 Improved bluetooth connectivity \n\\\n\u2022 Fixed Instagram swiping bug\n\\\n\u2022 Fixed hardware buttons\u00a0malfunction\u00a0bug\n\\\n\u2022 Increased system stability\n\\\n\u2022 General bug fixes\n [www.oneplus.net](http://www.oneplus.net/)", "new_version": "OnePlus3TOxygen_28.A.51_GLO_051_1704112011", "patchFilePath": "/patch/amazone2/GLO/OnePlus3TOxygen/OnePlus3TOxygen_28.A.51_GLO_051_1704112011/OnePlus3TOxygen_28_OTA_051_all_1704112011_d6f79637e1c.zip", "patch_md5": "031507863135b7008c2651ea461d0e9e", "patch_name": "OnePlus3TOxygen_28_OTA_051_all_1704112011_d6f79637e1c.zip", "patch_size": "1461187808", "recommend": "100", "share": "\u8bf7\u7528\u82f1\u8bed\u8bbe\u7f6e\u5206\u4eab\u5185\u5bb9", "type": "1", "version_name": "OnePlus3TOxygen_28_1704112011", "wipe": "0" } ``` Man-in-the-Middle attackers can therefore spoof this response in order to exploit CVE-2017-5948, CVE-2017-8850 & CVE-2017-8851. ### POC `https://github.com/alephsecurity/research/tree/master/OnePlusOTA` #### Timeline * 11-May-17: Public disclosure. * 10-May-17: Deadline Extension. * 08-May-17: CVE-2016-10370 assigned. * 08-May-17: CVE ID requested. * 08-May-17: Added as ALEPH-2017022. * 26-Apr-17: Deadline. * 09-Apr-17: 14-day Deadline Extension Offered (no reply). * 26-Jan-17: Reported.
    idSSV:93109
    last seen2017-11-19
    modified2017-05-12
    published2017-05-12
    reporterRoot
    titleOnePlus OTA Lack of TLS Vulnerability(CVE-2016-10370)

The Hacker News

idTHN:51F38064616715ED3D71C32EC64BFB0F
last seen2018-01-27
modified2017-05-12
published2017-05-11
reporterSwati Khandelwal
sourcehttps://thehackernews.com/2017/05/oneplus-mobile-vulnerabilities.html
titleAll OnePlus Devices Vulnerable to Remote Attacks Due to 4 Unpatched Flaws