Vulnerabilities > CVE-2013-4310 - Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in Apache Struts

047910
CVSS 5.8 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
MEDIUM
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
PARTIAL
Integrity impact
PARTIAL
Availability impact
NONE
network
apache
CWE-264
nessus

Summary

Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.15.1 allows remote attackers to bypass access controls via a crafted action: prefix.

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Accessing, Modifying or Executing Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an attacker to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an attacker to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
  • Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files, when the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high. The attack can be directed at a client system, such as causing buffer overrun through loading seemingly benign image files, as in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 where specially crafted JPEG files could cause a buffer overrun once loaded into the browser. Another example targets clients reading pdf files. In this case the attacker simply appends javascript to the end of a legitimate url for a pdf (http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/danger-danger-danger/) http://path/to/pdf/file.pdf#whatever_name_you_want=javascript:your_code_here The client assumes that they are reading a pdf, but the attacker has modified the resource and loaded executable javascript into the client's browser process. The attack can also target server processes. The attacker edits the resource or configuration file, for example a web.xml file used to configure security permissions for a J2EE app server, adding role name "public" grants all users with the public role the ability to use the administration functionality. The server trusts its configuration file to be correct, but when they are manipulated, the attacker gains full control.
  • Blue Boxing
    This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
  • Restful Privilege Elevation
    Rest uses standard HTTP (Get, Put, Delete) style permissions methods, but these are not necessarily correlated generally with back end programs. Strict interpretation of HTTP get methods means that these HTTP Get services should not be used to delete information on the server, but there is no access control mechanism to back up this logic. This means that unless the services are properly ACL'd and the application's service implementation are following these guidelines then an HTTP request can easily execute a delete or update on the server side. The attacker identifies a HTTP Get URL such as http://victimsite/updateOrder, which calls out to a program to update orders on a database or other resource. The URL is not idempotent so the request can be submitted multiple times by the attacker, additionally, the attacker may be able to exploit the URL published as a Get method that actually performs updates (instead of merely retrieving data). This may result in malicious or inadvertent altering of data on the server.
  • Target Programs with Elevated Privileges
    This attack targets programs running with elevated privileges. The attacker would try to leverage a bug in the running program and get arbitrary code to execute with elevated privileges. For instance an attacker would look for programs that write to the system directories or registry keys (such as HKLM, which stores a number of critical Windows environment variables). These programs are typically running with elevated privileges and have usually not been designed with security in mind. Such programs are excellent exploit targets because they yield lots of power when they break. The malicious user try to execute its code at the same level as a privileged system call.

Nessus

  • NASL familyCGI abuses
    NASL idSTRUTS_2_3_15_2.NASL
    descriptionThe remote web application appears to use Struts 2, a web framework used for creating Java web applications. The version of Struts 2 in use is affected by a security constraint bypass vulnerability due to a flaw in the action mapping mechanism. Under certain unspecified conditions, an attacker could exploit this issue to bypass security constraints. Note that this version of Struts 2 is known to have Dynamic Method Invocation (DMI) enabled by default. This can expose Struts 2 to additional vulnerabilities so it is recommended that DMI be disabled. (CVE-2013-4316) Note that this plugin will only report the first vulnerable instance of a Struts 2 application.
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id70168
    published2013-09-27
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2013-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/70168
    titleApache Struts 2 'action:' Parameter Prefix Security Constraint Bypass
    code
    #
    # (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    #
    
    include("compat.inc");
    
    if (description)
    {
      script_id(70168);
      script_version("1.13");
      script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/11/27");
    
      script_cve_id("CVE-2013-4310", "CVE-2013-4316");
      script_bugtraq_id(62584);
    
      script_name(english:"Apache Struts 2 'action:' Parameter Prefix Security Constraint Bypass");
      script_summary(english:"Tests the handling of an action.");
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
    "The remote web server contains a web application that uses a Java
    framework that is affected by a security constraint bypass
    vulnerability.");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
    "The remote web application appears to use Struts 2, a web framework
    used for creating Java web applications. The version of Struts 2 in
    use is affected by a security constraint bypass vulnerability due to a
    flaw in the action mapping mechanism. Under certain unspecified
    conditions, an attacker could exploit this issue to bypass security
    constraints. 
    
    Note that this version of Struts 2 is known to have Dynamic Method
    Invocation (DMI) enabled by default. This can expose Struts 2 to
    additional vulnerabilities so it is recommended that DMI be disabled. 
    (CVE-2013-4316)
    
    Note that this plugin will only report the first vulnerable instance
    of a Struts 2 application.");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-018.html");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-019");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
    "Upgrade to version 2.3.15.2 or later.");
      script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C");
      script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
      script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N");
      script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2013-4316");
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No exploit is required");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2013/09/17");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2013/09/17");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2013/09/27");
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"remote");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:apache:struts");
      script_end_attributes();
    
      script_category(ACT_ATTACK);
      script_family(english:"CGI abuses");
    
      script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2013-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");
    
      script_dependencies("http_version.nasl", "webmirror.nasl");
      script_require_ports("Services/www", 80, 8080);
    
      exit(0);
    }
    
    include("audit.inc");
    include("global_settings.inc");
    include("http.inc");
    include("misc_func.inc");
    
    port = get_http_port(default:8080);
    cgis = get_kb_list('www/' + port + '/cgi');
    
    urls = make_list();
    # To identify actions that we can test the exploit on we will look
    # for files with the .action / .jsp / .do suffix from the KB.
    if (!isnull(cgis))
    {
      foreach cgi (cgis)
      {
        match = pregmatch(pattern:"((^.*)(/.+\.act(ion)?)($|\?|;))", string:cgi);
        if (match)
        {
          urls = make_list(urls, match[0]);
          if (!thorough_tests) break;
        }
        match2 = pregmatch(pattern:"(^.*)(/.+\.jsp)$", string:cgi);
        if (!isnull(match2))
        {
          urls = make_list(urls, match2[0]);
          if (!thorough_tests) break;
        }
        match3 = pregmatch(pattern:"(^.*)(/.+\.do)$", string:cgi);
        if (!isnull(match3))
        {
          urls = make_list(urls, match3[0]);
          if (!thorough_tests) break;
        }
        if (cgi =~ "struts2?(-rest)?-showcase")
        {
          urls = make_list(urls, cgi);
          if (!thorough_tests) break;
        }
      }
    }
    if (thorough_tests)
    {
      cgi2 = get_kb_list('www/' + port + '/content/extensions/act*');
      if (!isnull(cgi2)) urls = make_list(urls, cgi2);
    
      cgi3 = get_kb_list('www/' + port + '/content/extensions/jsp');
      if (!isnull(cgi3)) urls = make_list(urls, cgi3);
    
      cgi4 = get_kb_list('www/' + port + '/content/extensions/do');
      if (!isnull(cgi4)) urls = make_list(urls, cgi4);
    }
    
    if (max_index(urls) == 0)
      audit(AUDIT_WEB_FILES_NOT, "Struts 2 .action / .do / .jsp", port);
    
    urls = list_uniq(urls);
    
    script = SCRIPT_NAME - ".nasl" + '-' + unixtime();
    vuln = FALSE;
    
    foreach url (urls)
    {
      vuln_url = url + "?action:" + script;
    
      res = http_send_recv3(
        method : "GET",
        port   : port,
        item   : vuln_url,
        fetch404     : TRUE,
        exit_on_fail : TRUE
      );
    
      # Verify our 404 page contains our script name and verify that
      # .action was not appended to our script name as this would
      # indicate that 2.3.15.2 or later is in use
      if (
         res[0] =~ "404 Not Found" &&
         res[2] =~ "\<b\>message\</b\> .*/" + script &&
         res[2] !~ "\<b\>message\</b\> .*/" + script + "\.action"
      )
      {
        vuln = TRUE;
        break;
      }
      # Stop after first vulnerable Struts app is found
      if (vuln) break;
    }
    
    if (!vuln) exit(0, 'No vulnerable applications were detected on the web server listening on port '+port+'.');
    
    output = strstr(res[2], "message");
    if (empty_or_null(output)) output = res[2];
    
    security_report_v4(
      port       : port,
      severity   : SECURITY_HOLE,
      generic    : TRUE,
      request    : make_list(build_url(qs:vuln_url, port:port)),
      output     : chomp(output)
    );
    
  • NASL familyMisc.
    NASL idSTRUTS_2_3_15_3.NASL
    descriptionThe version of Apache Struts running on the remote host is 2.x prior to 2.3.15.3. It, therefore, is affected by a broken access control vulnerability which can be used to bypass security constraints. Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id117391
    published2018-09-10
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2018-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/117391
    titleApache Struts 2.x < 2.3.15.3 Broken Access Control Vulnerability (S2-018)
    code
    #
    # (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    #
    
    include("compat.inc");
    
    if (description)
    {
      script_id(117391);
      script_version("1.8");
      script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/11/05");
    
      script_cve_id("CVE-2013-4310");
      script_bugtraq_id(62584);
    
      script_name(english:"Apache Struts 2.x < 2.3.15.3 Broken Access Control Vulnerability (S2-018)");
      script_summary(english:"Checks the Struts 2 version.");
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
    "A web application running on the remote host uses a Java framework
    that is affected by a broken access control vulnerability.");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
    "The version of Apache Struts running on the remote host is 2.x
    prior to 2.3.15.3. It, therefore, is affected by a broken access
    control vulnerability which can be used to bypass security constraints.
    
    Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead
    relied only on the application's self-reported version number.");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-018");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
    "Upgrade to Apache Struts version 2.3.15.3 or later or follow the
    vendors instructions to disable DMI.");
      script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N");
      script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
      script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N");
      script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2013-4310");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"agent", value:"all");
    
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2013/09/06");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2013/09/06");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2018/09/10");
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"potential_vulnerability", value:"true");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"combined");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:apache:struts");
      script_end_attributes();
    
      script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
      script_family(english:"Misc.");
    
      script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2018-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");
    
      script_dependencies("os_fingerprint.nasl", "struts_detect_win.nbin", "struts_detect_nix.nbin", "struts_config_browser_detect.nbin");
      script_require_keys("Settings/ParanoidReport");
      script_require_ports("installed_sw/Apache Struts", "installed_sw/Struts");
    
      exit(0);
    }
    
    include("vcf.inc");
    
    if (report_paranoia < 2) audit(AUDIT_PARANOID);
    
    
    app_info = vcf::combined_get_app_info(app:"Apache Struts");
    
    vcf::check_granularity(app_info:app_info, sig_segments:3);
    
    constraints = [
      { "min_version" : "2.0.0", "max_version" : "2.3.15.2", "fixed_version" : "2.3.15.3" }
    ];
    
    vcf::check_version_and_report(app_info:app_info, constraints:constraints, severity:SECURITY_WARNING);
    

Seebug

bulletinFamilyexploit
descriptionBUGTRAQ ID: 62584 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2013-4310 Struts2 是第二代基于Model-View-Controller (MVC)模型的java企业级web应用框架。 Apache Struts 2.0.0-2.3.15.1的操作映射机制支持特殊参数前缀操作,这样有可能会在表格底部附加引导信息,在映射 &quot;action:&quot; 前缀操作时存在安全绕过漏洞,可被利用绕过某些安全限制,访问受限制功能。 0 Apache Group Struts &lt; 2.3.15.2 厂商补丁: Apache Group ------------ Apache Group已经为此发布了一个安全公告(s2-018)以及相应补丁: s2-018:S2-018 链接:http://struts.apache.org/release/2.3.x/docs/s2-018.html 补丁下载:http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi#struts23152
idSSV:61049
last seen2017-11-19
modified2013-09-26
published2013-09-26
reporterRoot
titleApache Struts 安全措施绕过漏洞