Vulnerabilities > CVE-2012-3558 - Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in Opera Browser

047910
CVSS 2.6 - LOW
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
HIGH
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
PARTIAL
Availability impact
NONE
network
high complexity
opera
CWE-264
nessus

Summary

Opera before 11.65 does not ensure that the address field corresponds to the displayed web page during unusually timed changes to this field, which makes it easier for user-assisted remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via vectors involving navigation, reloads, and redirects.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Opera
162

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Accessing, Modifying or Executing Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an attacker to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an attacker to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
  • Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files, when the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high. The attack can be directed at a client system, such as causing buffer overrun through loading seemingly benign image files, as in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 where specially crafted JPEG files could cause a buffer overrun once loaded into the browser. Another example targets clients reading pdf files. In this case the attacker simply appends javascript to the end of a legitimate url for a pdf (http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/danger-danger-danger/) http://path/to/pdf/file.pdf#whatever_name_you_want=javascript:your_code_here The client assumes that they are reading a pdf, but the attacker has modified the resource and loaded executable javascript into the client's browser process. The attack can also target server processes. The attacker edits the resource or configuration file, for example a web.xml file used to configure security permissions for a J2EE app server, adding role name "public" grants all users with the public role the ability to use the administration functionality. The server trusts its configuration file to be correct, but when they are manipulated, the attacker gains full control.
  • Blue Boxing
    This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
  • Restful Privilege Elevation
    Rest uses standard HTTP (Get, Put, Delete) style permissions methods, but these are not necessarily correlated generally with back end programs. Strict interpretation of HTTP get methods means that these HTTP Get services should not be used to delete information on the server, but there is no access control mechanism to back up this logic. This means that unless the services are properly ACL'd and the application's service implementation are following these guidelines then an HTTP request can easily execute a delete or update on the server side. The attacker identifies a HTTP Get URL such as http://victimsite/updateOrder, which calls out to a program to update orders on a database or other resource. The URL is not idempotent so the request can be submitted multiple times by the attacker, additionally, the attacker may be able to exploit the URL published as a Get method that actually performs updates (instead of merely retrieving data). This may result in malicious or inadvertent altering of data on the server.
  • Target Programs with Elevated Privileges
    This attack targets programs running with elevated privileges. The attacker would try to leverage a bug in the running program and get arbitrary code to execute with elevated privileges. For instance an attacker would look for programs that write to the system directories or registry keys (such as HKLM, which stores a number of critical Windows environment variables). These programs are typically running with elevated privileges and have usually not been designed with security in mind. Such programs are excellent exploit targets because they yield lots of power when they break. The malicious user try to execute its code at the same level as a privileged system call.

Nessus

  • NASL familyGentoo Local Security Checks
    NASL idGENTOO_GLSA-201206-03.NASL
    descriptionThe remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-201206-03 (Opera: Multiple vulnerabilities) Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Opera. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact : A remote attacker could entice a user to open a specially crafted web page, possibly resulting in execution of arbitrary code with the privileges of the process or a Denial of Service condition. A remote attacker may be able to: trick users into downloading and executing arbitrary files, bypass intended access restrictions, spoof trusted content, spoof URLs, bypass the Same Origin Policy, obtain sensitive information, force subscriptions to arbitrary feeds, bypass the popup blocker, bypass CSS filtering, conduct cross-site scripting attacks, or have other unknown impact. A local attacker could perform symlink attacks to overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the user running the application or possibly obtain sensitive information. A physically proximate attacker may be able to access an email account. Workaround : There is no known workaround at this time.
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id59631
    published2012-06-21
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2012-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/59631
    titleGLSA-201206-03 : Opera: Multiple vulnerabilities
    code
    #
    # (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    #
    # The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were
    # extracted from Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201206-03.
    #
    # The advisory text is Copyright (C) 2001-2019 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
    # and licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike 
    # license. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
    #
    
    include("compat.inc");
    
    if (description)
    {
      script_id(59631);
      script_version("1.7");
      script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/10/16 10:34:21");
    
      script_cve_id("CVE-2009-1234", "CVE-2009-2059", "CVE-2009-2063", "CVE-2009-2067", "CVE-2009-2070", "CVE-2009-3013", "CVE-2009-3044", "CVE-2009-3045", "CVE-2009-3046", "CVE-2009-3047", "CVE-2009-3048", "CVE-2009-3049", "CVE-2009-3831", "CVE-2009-4071", "CVE-2009-4072", "CVE-2010-0653", "CVE-2010-1349", "CVE-2010-1989", "CVE-2010-1993", "CVE-2010-2121", "CVE-2010-2421", "CVE-2010-2455", "CVE-2010-2576", "CVE-2010-2658", "CVE-2010-2659", "CVE-2010-2660", "CVE-2010-2661", "CVE-2010-2662", "CVE-2010-2663", "CVE-2010-2664", "CVE-2010-2665", "CVE-2010-3019", "CVE-2010-3020", "CVE-2010-3021", "CVE-2010-4579", "CVE-2010-4580", "CVE-2010-4581", "CVE-2010-4582", "CVE-2010-4583", "CVE-2010-4584", "CVE-2010-4585", "CVE-2010-4586", "CVE-2011-0681", "CVE-2011-0682", "CVE-2011-0683", "CVE-2011-0684", "CVE-2011-0685", "CVE-2011-0686", "CVE-2011-0687", "CVE-2011-1337", "CVE-2011-1824", "CVE-2011-2609", "CVE-2011-2610", "CVE-2011-2611", "CVE-2011-2612", "CVE-2011-2613", "CVE-2011-2614", "CVE-2011-2615", "CVE-2011-2616", "CVE-2011-2617", "CVE-2011-2618", "CVE-2011-2619", "CVE-2011-2620", "CVE-2011-2621", "CVE-2011-2622", "CVE-2011-2623", "CVE-2011-2624", "CVE-2011-2625", "CVE-2011-2626", "CVE-2011-2627", "CVE-2011-2628", "CVE-2011-2629", "CVE-2011-2630", "CVE-2011-2631", "CVE-2011-2632", "CVE-2011-2633", "CVE-2011-2634", "CVE-2011-2635", "CVE-2011-2636", "CVE-2011-2637", "CVE-2011-2638", "CVE-2011-2639", "CVE-2011-2640", "CVE-2011-2641", "CVE-2011-3388", "CVE-2011-4065", "CVE-2011-4681", "CVE-2011-4682", "CVE-2011-4683", "CVE-2012-1924", "CVE-2012-1925", "CVE-2012-1926", "CVE-2012-1927", "CVE-2012-1928", "CVE-2012-1930", "CVE-2012-1931", "CVE-2012-3555", "CVE-2012-3556", "CVE-2012-3557", "CVE-2012-3558", "CVE-2012-3560", "CVE-2012-3561");
      script_xref(name:"GLSA", value:"201206-03");
    
      script_name(english:"GLSA-201206-03 : Opera: Multiple vulnerabilities");
      script_summary(english:"Checks for updated package(s) in /var/db/pkg");
    
      script_set_attribute(
        attribute:"synopsis", 
        value:
    "The remote Gentoo host is missing one or more security-related
    patches."
      );
      script_set_attribute(
        attribute:"description", 
        value:
    "The remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-201206-03
    (Opera: Multiple vulnerabilities)
    
        Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Opera. Please review
          the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
      
    Impact :
    
        A remote attacker could entice a user to open a specially crafted web
          page, possibly resulting in execution of arbitrary code with the
          privileges of the process or a Denial of Service condition. A remote
          attacker may be able to: trick users into downloading and executing
          arbitrary files, bypass intended access restrictions, spoof trusted
          content, spoof URLs, bypass the Same Origin Policy, obtain sensitive
          information, force subscriptions to arbitrary feeds, bypass the popup
          blocker, bypass CSS filtering, conduct cross-site scripting attacks, or
          have other unknown impact.
        A local attacker could perform symlink attacks to overwrite arbitrary
          files with the privileges of the user running the application or possibly
          obtain sensitive information.
        A physically proximate attacker may be able to access an email account.
      
    Workaround :
    
        There is no known workaround at this time."
      );
      script_set_attribute(
        attribute:"see_also",
        value:"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201206-03"
      );
      script_set_attribute(
        attribute:"solution", 
        value:
    "All Opera users should upgrade to the latest version:
          # emerge --sync
          # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose '>=www-client/opera-12.00.1467'"
      );
      script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"Exploits are available");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"true");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploited_by_malware", value:"true");
      script_cwe_id(16, 20, 79, 94, 264, 287, 310);
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"p-cpe:/a:gentoo:linux:opera");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/o:gentoo:linux");
    
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2009/04/02");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2012/06/15");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2012/06/21");
      script_set_attribute(attribute:"generated_plugin", value:"current");
      script_end_attributes();
    
      script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
      script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2012-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");
      script_family(english:"Gentoo Local Security Checks");
    
      script_dependencies("ssh_get_info.nasl");
      script_require_keys("Host/local_checks_enabled", "Host/Gentoo/release", "Host/Gentoo/qpkg-list");
    
      exit(0);
    }
    
    
    include("audit.inc");
    include("global_settings.inc");
    include("qpkg.inc");
    
    if (!get_kb_item("Host/local_checks_enabled")) audit(AUDIT_LOCAL_CHECKS_NOT_ENABLED);
    if (!get_kb_item("Host/Gentoo/release")) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "Gentoo");
    if (!get_kb_item("Host/Gentoo/qpkg-list")) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_LIST_MISSING);
    
    
    flag = 0;
    
    if (qpkg_check(package:"www-client/opera", unaffected:make_list("ge 12.00.1467"), vulnerable:make_list("lt 12.00.1467"))) flag++;
    
    if (flag)
    {
      if (report_verbosity > 0) security_hole(port:0, extra:qpkg_report_get());
      else security_hole(0);
      exit(0);
    }
    else
    {
      tested = qpkg_tests_get();
      if (tested) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_AFFECTED, tested);
      else audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_INSTALLED, "Opera");
    }
    
  • NASL familyWindows
    NASL idOPERA_1200.NASL
    descriptionThe version of Opera installed on the remote host is prior to 12.00. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - An error exists that can allow the address bar to display incorrect locations due to certain combinations of navigation, reloads and redirects, which can aid in phishing attacks. (1018) - An error in JSON handling can allow cross-site scripting attacks. (1019) - An error exists related to handling double-click actions and new windows that can be used in cross-site scripting attacks. (1020) - An error exists in the handling of window focus that can allow keystrokes to be associated with non-visible windows. (1021) - An error in the handling of page loading can allow a malicious page to prevent the loading while showing an incorrect URL in the address bar. (1022)
    last seen2020-06-01
    modified2020-06-02
    plugin id59555
    published2012-06-18
    reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2012-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
    sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/59555
    titleOpera < 12 Multiple Vulnerabilities