Vulnerabilities > CVE-2012-2549 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2012

047910
CVSS 5.8 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
MEDIUM
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
PARTIAL
Integrity impact
PARTIAL
Availability impact
NONE
network
microsoft
CWE-20
nessus

Summary

The IP-HTTPS server in Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Server 2012 does not properly validate certificates, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a revoked certificate, aka "Revoked Certificate Bypass Vulnerability."

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Msbulletin

bulletin_idMS12-083
bulletin_url
date2012-12-11T00:00:00
impactSecurity Feature Bypass
knowledgebase_id2765809
knowledgebase_url
severityImportant
titleVulnerability in IP-HTTPS Component Could Allow Security Feature Bypass

Nessus

NASL familyWindows : Microsoft Bulletins
NASL idSMB_NT_MS12-083.NASL
descriptionA security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows due to the way the IP-HTTPS Component handles certificates. The vulnerability could allow security feature bypass if an attacker presents a revoked certificate to an IP-HTTPS server commonly used in Microsoft DirectAccess deployments. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must use a certificate issued from the domain for IP-HTTPS server authentication. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass certificate validation checks. Logging on to a system inside the organization would still require system or domain credentials.
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id63230
published2012-12-11
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2012-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/63230
titleMS12-083: Vulnerability in IP-HTTPS Component Could Allow Security Feature Bypass (2765809)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(63230);
  script_version("1.10");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/12/04");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2012-2549");
  script_bugtraq_id(56840);
  script_xref(name:"MSFT", value:"MS12-083");
  script_xref(name:"IAVB", value:"2012-B-0122");
  script_xref(name:"MSKB", value:"2765809");

  script_name(english:"MS12-083: Vulnerability in IP-HTTPS Component Could Allow Security Feature Bypass (2765809)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks version of iphlpsvc.dll");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote Windows host is affected by a security feature bypass
vulnerability.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Windows due to the
way the IP-HTTPS Component handles certificates.  The vulnerability
could allow security feature bypass if an attacker presents a revoked
certificate to an IP-HTTPS server commonly used in Microsoft
DirectAccess deployments.  To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker
must use a certificate issued from the domain for IP-HTTPS server
authentication.

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker
to bypass certificate validation checks.  Logging on to a system inside
the organization would still require system or domain credentials.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/SecurityBulletins/2012/ms12-083");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Microsoft has released a set of patches for Windows 2008 R2 and 2012.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2012-2549");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2012/12/11");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2012/12/11");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2012/12/11");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"stig_severity", value:"I");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2012-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");

  script_dependencies("smb_hotfixes.nasl", "ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl");
  script_require_keys("SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible");
  script_require_ports(139, 445, "Host/patch_management_checks");

  exit(0);
}

include("audit.inc");
include("smb_func.inc");
include("smb_hotfixes.inc");
include("smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");

get_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');

bulletin = 'MS12-083';
kb = '2765809';

kbs = make_list(kb);
if (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_WARNING);

get_kb_item_or_exit("SMB/Registry/Enumerated");
get_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);

if (hotfix_check_sp_range(win7:'0,1', win8:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);

productname = get_kb_item_or_exit("SMB/ProductName", exit_code:1);
if ("Windows 7" >< productname || "Windows 8" >< productname || "Windows Embedded" >< productname) exit(0, "The host is running "+productname+" and hence is not affected.");

rootfile = hotfix_get_systemroot();
if (!rootfile) exit(1, "Failed to get the system root.");

share = hotfix_path2share(path:rootfile);
if (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);

if (
  # Windows Server 2012
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.2", sp:0, file:"iphlpsvc.dll", version:"6.2.9200.16449", min_version:"6.2.9200.16000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.2", sp:0, file:"iphlpsvc.dll", version:"6.2.9200.20553", min_version:"6.2.9200.20000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||

  # Windows Server 2008 R2
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.1", sp:0, file:"iphlpsvc.dll", version:"6.1.7600.17157", min_version:"6.1.7600.16000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.1", sp:0, file:"iphlpsvc.dll", version:"6.1.7600.21360", min_version:"6.1.7600.20000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.1", sp:1, file:"iphlpsvc.dll", version:"6.1.7601.17989", min_version:"6.1.7601.17000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.1", sp:1, file:"iphlpsvc.dll", version:"6.1.7601.22150", min_version:"6.1.7601.21000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb)
)
{
  set_kb_item(name:"SMB/Missing/"+bulletin, value:TRUE);
  hotfix_security_warning();
  hotfix_check_fversion_end();
  exit(0);
}
else
{
  hotfix_check_fversion_end();
  audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, 'affected');
}

Oval

accepted2013-05-06T04:01:52.427-04:00
classvulnerability
contributors
  • nameSecPod Team
    organizationSecPod Technologies
  • namePradeep R B
    organizationSecPod Technologies
  • nameSharath S
    organizationSecPod Technologies
definition_extensions
  • commentMicrosoft Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Edition is installed
    ovaloval:org.mitre.oval:def:6438
  • commentMicrosoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Itanium-Based Edition is installed
    ovaloval:org.mitre.oval:def:5954
  • commentMicrosoft Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Service Pack 1 is installed
    ovaloval:org.mitre.oval:def:12567
  • commentMicrosoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Itanium-Based Edition Service Pack 1 is installed
    ovaloval:org.mitre.oval:def:12583
  • commentMicrosoft Windows Server 2012 is installed
    ovaloval:org.mitre.oval:def:16359
descriptionThe IP-HTTPS server in Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Server 2012 does not properly validate certificates, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a revoked certificate, aka "Revoked Certificate Bypass Vulnerability."
familywindows
idoval:org.mitre.oval:def:16117
statusaccepted
submitted2012-12-12T09:41:08
titleRevoked Certificate Bypass Vulnerability - MS12-083
version76