Vulnerabilities > CVE-2011-1686 - SQL Injection vulnerability in Bestpractical RT
Attack vector
UNKNOWN Attack complexity
UNKNOWN Privileges required
UNKNOWN Confidentiality impact
UNKNOWN Integrity impact
UNKNOWN Availability impact
UNKNOWN Summary
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Best Practical Solutions RT 2.0.0 through 3.6.10, 3.8.0 through 3.8.9, and 4.0.0rc through 4.0.0rc7 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by reading data.
Vulnerable Configurations
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL Injection An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
- Object Relational Mapping Injection An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject his or her own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
- Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database An attacker is able to leverage access gained to the database to read / write data to the file system, compromise the operating system, create a tunnel for accessing the host machine, and use this access to potentially attack other machines on the same network as the database machine. Traditionally SQL injections attacks are viewed as a way to gain unauthorized read access to the data stored in the database, modify the data in the database, delete the data, etc. However, almost every data base management system (DBMS) system includes facilities that if compromised allow an attacker complete access to the file system, operating system, and full access to the host running the database. The attacker can then use this privileged access to launch subsequent attacks. These facilities include dropping into a command shell, creating user defined functions that can call system level libraries present on the host machine, stored procedures, etc.
- SQL Injection This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input. When specially crafted user-controlled input consisting of SQL syntax is used without proper validation as part of SQL queries, it is possible to glean information from the database in ways not envisaged during application design. Depending upon the database and the design of the application, it may also be possible to leverage injection to have the database execute system-related commands of the attackers' choice. SQL Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. In order to successfully inject SQL and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
Nessus
NASL family Debian Local Security Checks NASL id DEBIAN_DSA-2220.NASL description Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Request Tracker, an issue tracking system. - CVE-2011-1685 If the external custom field feature is enabled, Request Tracker allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the web server, possible triggered by a cross-site request forgery attack. (External custom fields are disabled by default.) - CVE-2011-1686 Multiple SQL injection attacks allow authenticated users to obtain data from the database in an unauthorized way. - CVE-2011-1687 An information leak allows an authenticated privileged user to obtain sensitive information, such as encrypted passwords, via the search interface. - CVE-2011-1688 When running under certain web servers (such as Lighttpd), Request Tracker is vulnerable to a directory traversal attack, allowing attackers to read any files accessible to the web server. Request Tracker instances running under Apache or Nginx are not affected. - CVE-2011-1689 Request Tracker contains multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. - CVE-2011-1690 Request Tracker enables attackers to redirect authentication credentials supplied by legitimate users to third-party servers. last seen 2020-03-17 modified 2011-04-20 plugin id 53495 published 2011-04-20 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2011-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/53495 title Debian DSA-2220-1 : request-tracker3.6, request-tracker3.8 - several vulnerabilities NASL family FreeBSD Local Security Checks NASL id FREEBSD_PKG_BF17150968DD11E0AFE60003BA02BF30.NASL description Best Practical reports : In the process of preparing the release of RT 4.0.0, we performed an extensive security audit of RT last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 53470 published 2011-04-18 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2011-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/53470 title FreeBSD : rt -- multiple vulnerabilities (bf171509-68dd-11e0-afe6-0003ba02bf30)
References
- http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/04/security-vulnerabilities-in-rt.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000187.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000188.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000189.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44189
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2220
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47383
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1071
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696795
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66792
- http://blog.bestpractical.com/2011/04/security-vulnerabilities-in-rt.html
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66792
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696795
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1071
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47383
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2220
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44189
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000189.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000188.html
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-April/000187.html