Vulnerabilities > CVE-2010-0482 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008
Attack vector
LOCAL Attack complexity
MEDIUM Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
NONE Integrity impact
NONE Availability impact
COMPLETE Summary
The kernel in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7 does not properly validate relocation sections of image files, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (reboot) via a crafted file, aka "Windows Kernel Malformed Image Vulnerability."
Vulnerable Configurations
| Part | Description | Count |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 4 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
- Server Side Include (SSI) Injection An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
- Cross Zone Scripting An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
- Cross Site Scripting through Log Files An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
- Command Line Execution through SQL Injection An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
Msbulletin
| bulletin_id | MS10-021 |
| bulletin_url | |
| date | 2010-04-13T00:00:00 |
| impact | Elevation of Privilege |
| knowledgebase_id | 979683 |
| knowledgebase_url | |
| severity | Important |
| title | Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel Could Allow Elevation of Privilege |
Nessus
| NASL family | Windows : Microsoft Bulletins |
| NASL id | SMB_NT_MS10-021.NASL |
| description | The remote Windows host is running a version of the Windows kernel that is affected by eight vulnerabilities : - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel due to the insufficient validation of registry keys passed to a Windows kernel system call. (CVE-2010-0234) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel due to the manner in which the kernel processes the values of symbolic links. (CVE-2010-0235) - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel due to the manner in which memory is allocated when extracting a symbolic link from a registry key. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. (CVE-2010-0236) - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel does not properly restrict symbolic link creation between untrusted and trusted registry hives. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. (CVE-2010-0237) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows kernel validates registry keys. (CVE-2010-0238) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel due to the way that the kernel resolves the real path for a registry key from its virtual path. (CVE-2010-0481) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel due to the improper validation of specially crafted image files. (CVE-2010-0482) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel due to the way that the kernel handles certain exceptions. (CVE-2010-0810) |
| last seen | 2020-06-01 |
| modified | 2020-06-02 |
| plugin id | 45508 |
| published | 2010-04-13 |
| reporter | This script is Copyright (C) 2010-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc. |
| source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/45508 |
| title | MS10-021: Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (979683) |
| code | |
Oval
| accepted | 2012-03-26T04:03:48.456-04:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| class | vulnerability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| contributors |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| definition_extensions |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| description | The kernel in Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7 does not properly validate relocation sections of image files, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (reboot) via a crafted file, aka "Windows Kernel Malformed Image Vulnerability." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| family | windows | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| id | oval:org.mitre.oval:def:7176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| status | accepted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| submitted | 2010-03-13T13:00:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| title | Windows Kernel Malformed Image Vulnerability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| version | 74 |
Seebug
| bulletinFamily | exploit |
| description | BUGTRAQ ID: 39320 CVE ID: CVE-2010-0482 Microsoft Windows是微软发布的非常流行的操作系统。 Windows内核没有正确地验证畸形图形文件的重新定位部分。攻击者可以通过运行特制应用程序来利用该漏洞，导致系统变得没有响应并自动重新启动。 Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Microsoft Windows 7 厂商补丁： Microsoft --------- Microsoft已经为此发布了一个安全公告（MS10-021）以及相应补丁: MS10-021：Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (979683) 链接：http://www.microsoft.com/china/technet/security/bulletin/MS10-021.mspx |
| id | SSV:19469 |
| last seen | 2017-11-19 |
| modified | 2010-04-19 |
| published | 2010-04-19 |
| reporter | Root |
| title | Microsoft Windows畸形图形文件处理本地拒绝服务漏洞（MS10-021） |
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39374
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1023850
- http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-103A.html
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-021
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7176