Vulnerabilities > CVE-2010-0016 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP
Attack vector
UNKNOWN Attack complexity
UNKNOWN Privileges required
UNKNOWN Confidentiality impact
UNKNOWN Integrity impact
UNKNOWN Availability impact
UNKNOWN Summary
The SMB client implementation in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP2 does not properly validate response fields, which allows remote SMB servers and man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted response, aka "SMB Client Pool Corruption Vulnerability."
Vulnerable Configurations
| Part | Description | Count |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 6 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
- Server Side Include (SSI) Injection An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
- Cross Zone Scripting An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
- Cross Site Scripting through Log Files An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
- Command Line Execution through SQL Injection An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
Msbulletin
| bulletin_id | MS10-006 |
| bulletin_url | |
| date | 2010-02-09T00:00:00 |
| impact | Remote Code Execution |
| knowledgebase_id | 978251 |
| knowledgebase_url | |
| severity | Critical |
| title | Vulnerabilities in SMB Client Could Allow Remote Code Execution |
Nessus
| NASL family | Windows : Microsoft Bulletins |
| NASL id | SMB_NT_MS10-006.NASL |
| description | The version of the SMB client software installed on the remote Windows host is affected by two vulnerabilities that could allow arbitrary code execution : - Improper validation of fields in SMB responses can lead to a pool corruption issue and in turn to arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM level privileges. (CVE-2010-0016) - Improper handling of a race condition involving SMB |
| last seen | 2020-06-01 |
| modified | 2020-06-02 |
| plugin id | 44416 |
| published | 2010-02-09 |
| reporter | This script is Copyright (C) 2010-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc. |
| source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/44416 |
| title | MS10-006: Vulnerabilities in SMB Client Could Allow Remote Code Execution (978251) |
| code | |
Oval
| accepted | 2010-03-22T04:00:07.474-04:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| class | vulnerability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| contributors |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| definition_extensions |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| description | The SMB client implementation in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, and Server 2003 SP2 does not properly validate response fields, which allows remote SMB servers and man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted response, aka "SMB Client Pool Corruption Vulnerability." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| family | windows | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| id | oval:org.mitre.oval:def:8278 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| status | accepted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| submitted | 2010-02-08T13:00:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| title | SMB Client Pool Corruption Vulnerability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| version | 40 |
Seebug
| bulletinFamily | exploit |
| description | BUGTRAQ ID: 38093 CVE ID: CVE-2010-0016 Microsoft Windows是微软发布的非常流行的操作系统。 SMB客户端实现没有正确的验证SMB响应中的字段，远程攻击者可以通过向初始SMB请求的客户端回复特制的SMB响应来利用这个漏洞，导致完全控制受影响的系统。 在初始化SMB通讯时客户端会发送Negotiate Protocol报文来协商对话，服务器的响应包含有以下结构： uchar WordCount; /* must be 0x11 (17) */ ushort DialectIndex; /* selected dialect */ uchar SecurityMode; /* security flags */ ushort MaxMpxCount; /* maximum pending multiplexed requests supported */ ushort MaxNumberVCs; /* maximum virtual connections */ ulong MaxBufferSize; /* maximum SMB message size */ ulong MaxRawSize; /* maximum raw buffer size */ ulong SessionKey; /* unique session identifier */ ulong Capabilities; /* server capabilities */ ulong SystemTimeLow; /* server time - low bytes */ ulong SystemTimeHigh; /* server time - high bytes */ short ServerTimeZone; /* time zone */ uchar EncryptionKeyLength; /* set to 0 or 8 */ 如果服务端返回了包含有很小MaxBufferSize值的响应报文，就可以触发内核池破坏。 Microsoft Windows XP SP3 Microsoft Windows XP SP2 Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2 Microsoft Windows 2000SP4 临时解决方法： * 在防火墙阻断TCP 139和445端口。 厂商补丁： Microsoft --------- Microsoft已经为此发布了一个安全公告（MS10-006）以及相应补丁: MS10-006：Vulnerabilities in SMB Client Could Allow Remote Code Execution (978251) 链接：http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS10-006.mspx?pf=true |
| id | SSV:19148 |
| last seen | 2017-11-19 |
| modified | 2010-02-20 |
| published | 2010-02-20 |
| reporter | Root |
| title | Microsoft Windows SMB客户端池破坏远程代码执行漏洞（MS10-006） |