Vulnerabilities > CVE-2009-0871 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Digium Asterisk

047910
CVSS 0.0 - NONE
Attack vector
UNKNOWN
Attack complexity
UNKNOWN
Privileges required
UNKNOWN
Confidentiality impact
UNKNOWN
Integrity impact
UNKNOWN
Availability impact
UNKNOWN
digium
CWE-20
nessus
NVD
Published: 2009-03-11
Updated: 2018-10-10

Summary

The SIP channel driver in Asterisk Open Source 1.4.22, 1.4.23, and 1.4.23.1; 1.6.0 before 1.6.0.6; 1.6.1 before 1.6.1.0-rc2; and Asterisk Business Edition C.2.3, with the pedantic option enabled, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) via a SIP INVITE request without any headers, which triggers a NULL pointer dereference in the (1) sip_uri_headers_cmp and (2) sip_uri_params_cmp functions.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Digium
30

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.

Nessus

NASL familyFedora Local Security Checks
NASL idFEDORA_2009-9374.NASL
descriptionUpdate to 1.6.0.15 to fix many bugs... Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id41632
published2009-09-28
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2009-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/41632
titleFedora 10 : asterisk-1.6.0.15-1.fc10 (2009-9374)
code
#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 80502
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#
# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were  
# extracted from Fedora Security Advisory 2009-9374.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(41632);
  script_version ("1.17");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/08/02 13:32:30");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2009-0871", "CVE-2009-2346", "CVE-2009-2726");
  script_bugtraq_id(33174, 36015, 36275);
  script_xref(name:"FEDORA", value:"2009-9374");

  script_name(english:"Fedora 10 : asterisk-1.6.0.15-1.fc10 (2009-9374)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks rpm output for the updated package.");

  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"synopsis", 
    value:"The remote Fedora host is missing a security update."
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"description", 
    value:
"Update to 1.6.0.15 to fix many bugs...

Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding
description block directly from the Fedora security advisory. Tenable
has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible
without introducing additional issues."
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489725"
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516990"
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521164"
  );
  # https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2009-September/029455.html
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"see_also",
    value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?6e485d5d"
  );
  script_set_attribute(
    attribute:"solution", 
    value:"Update the affected asterisk package."
  );
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");
  script_cwe_id(20, 119, 399);

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"p-cpe:/a:fedoraproject:fedora:asterisk");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:10");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2009/09/06");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2009/09/28");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2009-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");
  script_family(english:"Fedora Local Security Checks");

  script_dependencies("ssh_get_info.nasl");
  script_require_keys("Host/local_checks_enabled", "Host/RedHat/release", "Host/RedHat/rpm-list");

  exit(0);
}


include("audit.inc");
include("global_settings.inc");
include("rpm.inc");

if (!get_kb_item("Host/local_checks_enabled")) audit(AUDIT_LOCAL_CHECKS_NOT_ENABLED);
release = get_kb_item("Host/RedHat/release");
if (isnull(release) || "Fedora" >!< release) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "Fedora");
os_ver = eregmatch(pattern: "Fedora.*release ([0-9]+)", string:release);
if (isnull(os_ver)) audit(AUDIT_UNKNOWN_APP_VER, "Fedora");
os_ver = os_ver[1];
if (! ereg(pattern:"^10([^0-9]|$)", string:os_ver)) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "Fedora 10.x", "Fedora " + os_ver);

if (!get_kb_item("Host/RedHat/rpm-list")) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_LIST_MISSING);

cpu = get_kb_item("Host/cpu");
if (isnull(cpu)) audit(AUDIT_UNKNOWN_ARCH);
if ("x86_64" >!< cpu && cpu !~ "^i[3-6]86$") audit(AUDIT_LOCAL_CHECKS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED, "Fedora", cpu);

flag = 0;
if (rpm_check(release:"FC10", reference:"asterisk-1.6.0.15-1.fc10")) flag++;


if (flag)
{
  if (report_verbosity > 0) security_hole(port:0, extra:rpm_report_get());
  else security_hole(0);
  exit(0);
}
else
{
  tested = pkg_tests_get();
  if (tested) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_AFFECTED, tested);
  else audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_INSTALLED, "asterisk");
}

Seebug

bulletinFamilyexploit
descriptionBUGTRAQ ID: 34070 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2009-0871 Asterisk是开放源码的软件PBX，支持各种VoIP协议和设备。 如果配置pedantic=yes的话，SIP信道驱动会对SIP回溯所接收到的INVITE执行额外的请求URI检查，检查中会对所发送的出站SIP INVITE头与接收到的SIP INVITE头做比较，检查代码假设所有情况下的每个头都不会为空，而实际上如果没有头的话，传送的值会为空，这可能在 sip_uri_params_cmp()和sip_uri_headers_cmp()函数中触发空指针引用。远程攻击者可以通过发送畸形的 INVITE消息导致SIP信道驱动崩溃。 Asterisk Asterisk 1.6.x Asterisk Asterisk 1.4.x Asterisk Business Edition C.x.x 临时解决方法： * 关闭SIP信道驱动的pedantic选项。 厂商补丁： Asterisk -------- 目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题，请到厂商的主页下载： <a href=http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-002-1.4.diff target=_blank rel=external nofollow>http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-002-1.4.diff</a> <a href=http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-002-1.6.0.diff target=_blank rel=external nofollow>http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-002-1.6.0.diff</a> <a href=http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-002-1.6.1.diff target=_blank rel=external nofollow>http://downloads.digium.com/pub/security/AST-2009-002-1.6.1.diff</a>
idSSV:4903
last seen2017-11-19
modified2009-03-14
published2009-03-14
reporterRoot
titleAsterisk Pedantic模式SIP信道驱动INVITE头拒绝服务漏洞

References