Vulnerabilities > CVE-2007-4516 - Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Symantec Veritas Storage Foundation 5.0
Attack vector
NETWORK Attack complexity
MEDIUM Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
NONE Integrity impact
NONE Availability impact
PARTIAL Summary
The Volume Manager Scheduler Service (aka VxSchedService.exe) in Symantec Veritas Storage Foundation 5.0 for Windows allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash or hang) via malformed packets.
Vulnerable Configurations
Part | Description | Count |
---|---|---|
Application | 2 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
- Server Side Include (SSI) Injection An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
- Cross Zone Scripting An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
- Cross Site Scripting through Log Files An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
- Command Line Execution through SQL Injection An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
Nessus
NASL family | Denial of Service |
NASL id | VERITAS_STORAGE_FOUNDATION_DOS.NASL |
description | Veritas Storage Foundation, a storage management solution from Symantec is installed on the remote host. The installed version is reportedly affected by a denial of service vulnerability. By sending specially crafted IP packets to TCP port 4888, an unauthenticated attacker may be able to cause a denial of service condition and crash the scheduler service. In addition the Administration service may also be affected by a heap overflow vulnerability. |
last seen | 2020-06-01 |
modified | 2020-06-02 |
plugin id | 31862 |
published | 2008-04-15 |
reporter | This script is Copyright (C) 2008-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc. |
source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/31862 |
title | Veritas Storage Foundation Multiple Service Remote DoS (SYM08-004) |
code |
|
Seebug
bulletinFamily | exploit |
description | BUGTRAQ ID: 27440 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2007-4516 Veritas Storage Foundation是用于管理Veritas产品存储的解决方案。 Veritas Storage Foundation的Veritas Scheduler服务处理畸形用户请求时存在漏洞,远程攻击者可能利用此漏洞导致服务不可用。 如果Veritas Scheduler服务(VxSchedService.exe)接收到了畸形报文,就会触发无效的内存访问,导致该服务崩溃。攻击者无需认证便可以利用这个漏洞,但必须要在服务的4888端口创建TCP会话。 Symantec Veritas Storage Foundation for Windows 5.0 厂商补丁: Symantec -------- 目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题,请到厂商的主页下载: <a href=http://entsupport.symantec.com/docs/297166 target=_blank>http://entsupport.symantec.com/docs/297166</a> <a href=http://entsupport.symantec.com/docs/297167 target=_blank>http://entsupport.symantec.com/docs/297167</a> |
id | SSV:2925 |
last seen | 2017-11-19 |
modified | 2008-02-22 |
published | 2008-02-22 |
reporter | Root |
title | Symantec Veritas Storage Foundation Scheduler服务远程拒绝服务漏洞 |
References
- http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=665
- http://secunia.com/advisories/29033
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1019458
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27440
- http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2008.02.20.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0624