Security News > 2005 > September > Firefox flaw found: Remote exploit possible

Firefox flaw found: Remote exploit possible
2005-09-12 06:23

http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,104504,00.html By Peter Sayer SEPTEMBER 09, 2005 IDG NEWS SERVICE Computers running the Firefox browser could be open to remote attack as a result of a buffer overflow vulnerability reported today by security researcher Tom Ferris. Vulnerable versions of Firefox include all those up to 1.06, and even the just-released Version 1.5 Beta 1 (Deer Park Alpha 2), Ferris wrote in a posting to his Web site, Security Protocols, and to the Full Disclosure security mailing list just after 1 a.m. EDT today. Ferris said he reported the bug to staff at the Mozilla Foundation, the organization behind the Firefox browsers, on Sept. 4, but had no idea whether the foundation is working on a fix for the problem. The problem is caused by a bug in the code Firefox uses to process HTML links in Web pages, Ferris said. Links pointing to a host with a long name composed entirely of dashes can be crafted so that Firefox will execute arbitrary code of an attacker's choosing. Mozilla officials said today that they learned of the issue on Tuesday and are already working on a patch. "We have a preliminary patch for part of the problem, and are in the process of developing a comprehensive solution that will appear in a upcoming release," said Michael Schroepfer, Mozilla's head of engineering. He was not sure when the patch would be released. Last month, Ferris reported a critical flaw in fully patched versions of Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Explorer 6 running on Windows XP Service Pack 2. The flaw was acknowledged by Microsoft, but in that instance, Ferris did not reveal any details of the flaw or how it could be exploited. -=- Computerworld's Sharon Machlis and Todd Weiss contributed to this report. _________________________________________ Attend ToorCon Sept 16-18th, 2005 Convention Center San Diego, California www.toorcon.org


News URL

http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,104504,00.html