Vulnerabilities > Thomson > Medium
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-07-03 | CVE-2014-4716 | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Thomson Twg87Ouir Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Thomson TWG87OUIR allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that change passwords via the Password and PasswordReEnter parameters to goform/RgSecurity. | 6.8 |
| 2007-11-15 | CVE-2007-6003 | Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Thomson Speedtouch 716 Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in cgi/b/ic/connect in the Thomson SpeedTouch 716 with firmware 5.4.0.14 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the url parameter. | 4.3 |
| 2007-09-08 | CVE-2007-4753 | Denial-Of-Service vulnerability in Thomson ST 2030 SIP Phone 1.52.1 The Thomson ST 2030 SIP phone with software 1.52.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device hang) via (1) an empty SIP message or (2) a SIP INVITE message with a malformed To header, different vectors than CVE-2007-4553. | 5.0 |
| 2007-08-28 | CVE-2007-4553 | Remote Denial of Service vulnerability in Thomson ST 2030 SIP Phone 1 The Thomson ST 2030 SIP phone with software 1.52.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device hang) via an INVITE message with a Via header that contains a '/' (slash) instead of the required space following the SIP version number. | 5.0 |
| 2006-03-01 | CVE-2006-0946 | Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Thomson SpeedTouch 500 Series Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Thomson SpeedTouch modems running firmware 5.3.2.6.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the name parameter to the LocalNetwork page. network thomson | 4.3 |
| 2003-12-31 | CVE-2003-1085 | Remote Denial Of Service vulnerability in Thomson Cable Modem The HTTP server in the Thomson TWC305, TWC315, and TCW690 cable modem ST42.03.0a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (unstable service) via a long GET request, possibly caused by a buffer overflow. | 5.0 |