Vulnerabilities > Sophos
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-28 | CVE-2016-9554 | Command Injection vulnerability in Sophos web Appliance 4.2.1.3 The Sophos Web Appliance Remote / Secure Web Gateway server (version 4.2.1.3) is vulnerable to a Remote Command Injection vulnerability in its web administrative interface. | 7.2 |
| 2017-01-28 | CVE-2016-9553 | Command Injection vulnerability in Sophos web Appliance 4.2.1.3 The Sophos Web Appliance (version 4.2.1.3) is vulnerable to two Remote Command Injection vulnerabilities affecting its web administrative interface. | 7.2 |
| 2016-10-03 | CVE-2016-7442 | Information Exposure vulnerability in Sophos Unified Threat Management Software The Frontend component in Sophos UTM with firmware 9.405-5 and earlier allows local administrators to obtain sensitive password information by reading the "value" field of the proxy user settings in "system settings / scan settings / anti spam" configuration tab. | 4.4 |
| 2016-10-03 | CVE-2016-7397 | Information Exposure vulnerability in Sophos Unified Threat Management Software The Frontend component in Sophos UTM with firmware 9.405-5 and earlier allows local administrators to obtain sensitive password information by reading the "value" field of the SMTP user settings in the notifications configuration tab. | 4.4 |
| 2016-08-10 | CVE-2016-6597 | 7PK - Security Features vulnerability in Sophos Mobile Control EAS Proxy 3.5.0.3 Sophos EAS Proxy before 6.2.0 for Sophos Mobile Control, when Lotus Traveler is enabled, allows remote attackers to access arbitrary web-resources from the backend mail system via a request for the resource, aka an Open Reverse Proxy vulnerability. | 8.6 |
| 2016-04-06 | CVE-2016-3968 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Sophos products Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Sophos Cyberoam CR100iNG UTM appliance with firmware 10.6.3 MR-1 build 503, CR35iNG UTM appliance with firmware 10.6.2 MR-1 build 383, and CR35iNG UTM appliance with firmware 10.6.2 Build 378 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) ipFamily parameter to corporate/webpages/trafficdiscovery/LiveConnections.jsp; the (2) ipFamily, (3) applicationname, or (4) username parameter to corporate/webpages/trafficdiscovery/LiveConnectionDetail.jsp; or the (5) X-Forwarded-For HTTP header. | 6.1 |
| 2016-02-18 | CVE-2015-7547 | Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability in multiple products Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response that triggers a call to the getaddrinfo function with the AF_UNSPEC or AF_INET6 address family, related to performing "dual A/AAAA DNS queries" and the libnss_dns.so.2 NSS module. | 8.1 |
| 2016-02-17 | CVE-2016-2046 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Sophos Unified Threat Management Software Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the UserPortal page in SOPHOS UTM before 9.353 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the lang parameter. | 6.1 |
| 2016-01-14 | CVE-2016-0778 | Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability in multiple products The (1) roaming_read and (2) roaming_write functions in roaming_common.c in the client in OpenSSH 5.x, 6.x, and 7.x before 7.1p2, when certain proxy and forward options are enabled, do not properly maintain connection file descriptors, which allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact by requesting many forwardings. | 8.1 |
| 2016-01-14 | CVE-2016-0777 | Information Exposure vulnerability in multiple products The resend_bytes function in roaming_common.c in the client in OpenSSH 5.x, 6.x, and 7.x before 7.1p2 allows remote servers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by requesting transmission of an entire buffer, as demonstrated by reading a private key. | 6.5 |