Vulnerabilities > Qualcomm > Qca9377 Firmware > Critical
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | CVE-2019-2307 | Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) vulnerability in Qualcomm products Possible integer underflow due to lack of validation before calculation of data length in 802.11 Rx management configuration in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music in MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8996AU, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA9377, QCA9379, QCS405, QCS605, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 450, SD 600, SD 625, SD 636, SD 665, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 730, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 855, SDM630, SDM660, SDX20, SDX24 | 10.0 |
| 2019-05-24 | CVE-2018-11936 | Resource Exhaustion vulnerability in Qualcomm products Index of array is processed in a wrong way inside a while loop and result in invalid index (-1 or something else) leads to out of bound memory access. | 10.0 |
| 2019-05-24 | CVE-2018-11953 | Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in Qualcomm products While processing ssid IE length from remote AP, possible out-of-bounds access may occur due to crafted ssid IE length in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8909W, MSM8996AU, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA9377, QCA9379, Qualcomm 215, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 632, SD 650/52, SD 820, SD 820A, SDM439, SDX20 | 10.0 |
| 2018-04-18 | CVE-2014-10054 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in Qualcomm products In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8909W, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA9377, QCA9379, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 400, SD 450, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 600, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 800, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, and SDX20, lack of input validation on BT HCI commands processing allows privilege escalation. | 10.0 |
| 2018-04-18 | CVE-2014-9998 | Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability in Qualcomm products In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear IPQ4019, IPQ8064, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9650, QCA4531, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA6584, QCA6584AU, QCA9377, QCA9378, QCA9379, QCA9558, QCA9880, QCA9886, QCA9980, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 625, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, and SDX20, while processing firmware image signature, the internal buffer may overflow if the firmware signature size is large. | 10.0 |
| 2018-04-18 | CVE-2015-9220 | Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Qualcomm products In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear IPQ4019, IPQ8064, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, QCA4531, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA6584, QCA6584AU, QCA9377, QCA9378, QCA9379, QCA9558, QCA9880, QCA9886, QCA9980, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 625, SD 810, SD 820, and SDX20, integer overflow occurs when the size of the firmware section is incorrectly encoded in the firmware image. | 10.0 |
| 2018-04-18 | CVE-2016-10481 | Code vulnerability in Qualcomm products In Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9650, QCA4531, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA6584, QCA6584AU, QCA9377, QCA9378, QCA9379, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 600, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845, SD 850, and SDX20, if WLAN FW receives the WMI_STA_SMPS_PARAM_CMDID ioctl in not-associated state, when the virtual channel handle is not assigned, the code doesn't check for NULL virtual channel handle, so an assert occurs. | 10.0 |