Vulnerabilities > Oracle > Secure Global Desktop
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-16 | CVE-2021-40438 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in multiple products A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. | 9.0 |
| 2021-07-12 | CVE-2021-33037 | HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability in multiple products Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. | 5.3 |
| 2021-03-25 | CVE-2021-3450 | Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in multiple products The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. | 7.4 |
| 2021-03-25 | CVE-2021-3449 | NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in multiple products An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. | 5.9 |
| 2019-10-02 | CVE-2019-17091 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in multiple products faces/context/PartialViewContextImpl.java in Eclipse Mojarra, as used in Mojarra for Eclipse EE4J before 2.3.10 and Mojarra JavaServer Faces before 2.2.20, allows Reflected XSS because a client window field is mishandled. | 6.1 |
| 2019-09-26 | CVE-2019-10092 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in multiple products In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. | 6.1 |
| 2019-05-01 | CVE-2019-0227 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in multiple products A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. | 7.5 |
| 2019-02-27 | CVE-2019-1559 | Information Exposure Through Discrepancy vulnerability in multiple products If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. | 5.9 |
| 2019-02-06 | CVE-2019-3823 | libcurl versions from 7.34.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a heap out-of-bounds read in the code handling the end-of-response for SMTP. | 7.5 |
| 2019-02-06 | CVE-2019-3822 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in multiple products libcurl versions from 7.36.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. | 9.8 |