Vulnerabilities > Mitel > Micollab
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2020-08-26 | CVE-2020-13767 | Unspecified vulnerability in Mitel Micollab The Mitel MiCollab application before 9.1.332 for iOS could allow an unauthorized user to access restricted files and folders due to insufficient access control. | 5.9 |
2020-03-02 | CVE-2019-19370 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Mitel Micollab 8.1.2.1 A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web conferencing component of the Mitel MiCollab application before 9.0.15 for Android could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack due to insufficient validation in the file upload interface. | 6.1 |
2019-11-12 | CVE-2018-18819 | Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Mitel Micollab and Mivoice Business Express A vulnerability in the web conference chat component of MiCollab, versions 7.3 PR6 (7.3.0.601) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP2 (8.0.2.202), and MiVoice Business Express versions 7.3 PR3 (7.3.1.302) and earlier, and 8.0 (8.0.0.40) through 8.0 SP2 FP1 (8.0.2.202), could allow creation of unauthorized chat sessions, due to insufficient access controls. | 5.3 |
2019-05-29 | CVE-2019-12165 | Unspecified vulnerability in Mitel products MiCollab 7.3 PR2 (7.3.0.204) and earlier, 7.2 (7.2.2.13) and earlier, and 7.1 (7.1.0.57) and earlier and MiCollab AWV 6.3 (6.3.0.103), 6.2 (6.2.2.8), 6.1 (6.1.0.28), 6.0 (6.0.0.61), and 5.0 (5.0.5.7) have a Command Execution Vulnerability. | 9.8 |
2018-05-22 | CVE-2018-3639 | Information Exposure Through Discrepancy vulnerability in multiple products Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. | 5.5 |
2014-04-07 | CVE-2014-0160 | Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in multiple products The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | 7.5 |