Vulnerabilities > Microsoft > Windows 2003 Server
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2005-06-14 | CVE-2005-1208 | Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Microsoft Windows HTML Help Integer overflow in Microsoft Windows 98, 2000, XP SP2 and earlier, and Server 2003 SP1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted compiled Help (.CHM) file with a large size field that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, as demonstrated using a "ms-its:" URL in Internet Explorer. | 10.0 |
2005-06-14 | CVE-2005-1207 | Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2003 Server and Windows XP Buffer overflow in the Web Client service in Microsoft Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a crafted WebDAV request containing special parameters. | 7.2 |
2005-06-14 | CVE-2005-1206 | Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server and Windows XP Buffer overflow in the Server Message Block (SMB) functionality for Microsoft Windows 2000, XP SP1 and SP2, and Server 2003 and SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka the "Server Message Block Vulnerability." | 7.5 |
2005-06-14 | CVE-2005-1205 | Remote Information Disclosure vulnerability in Multiple Vendor Telnet Client The Telnet client for Microsoft Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and Windows Services for UNIX allows remote attackers to read sensitive environment variables via the NEW-ENVIRON option with a SEND ENV_USERVAR command. | 5.0 |
2005-06-13 | CVE-2005-1935 | Remote Security vulnerability in Windows NT Terminal Server Heap-based buffer overflow in the BERDecBitString function in Microsoft ASN.1 library (MSASN1.DLL) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via nested constructed bit strings, which leads to a realloc of a non-null pointer and causes the function to overwrite previously freed memory, as demonstrated using a SPNEGO token with a constructed bit string during HTTP authentication, and a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0818. | 7.5 |
2005-05-31 | CVE-2005-0356 | Remote Denial Of Service vulnerability in Multiple Vendor TCP Timestamp PAWS Multiple TCP implementations with Protection Against Wrapped Sequence Numbers (PAWS) with the timestamps option enabled allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection loss) via a spoofed packet with a large timer value, which causes the host to discard later packets because they appear to be too old. | 5.0 |
2005-05-18 | CVE-2005-1649 | Denial of Service vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2003 Server and Windows XP The IPv6 support in Windows XP SP2, 2003 Server SP1, and Longhorn, with Windows Firewall turned off, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a TCP packet with the SYN flag set and the same destination and source address and port, a variant of CVE-2005-0688 and a reoccurrence of the "Land" vulnerability (CVE-1999-0016). | 5.0 |
2005-05-02 | CVE-2005-1184 | Denial Of Service vulnerability in Multiple Vendor TCP Session Acknowledgement Number The TCP/IP stack in multiple operating systems allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a TCP packet with the correct sequence number but the wrong Acknowledgement number, which generates a large number of "keep alive" packets. | 5.0 |
2005-05-02 | CVE-2005-0551 | Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server and Windows XP Stack-based buffer overflow in WINSRV.DLL in the Client Server Runtime System (CSRSS) process of Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP SP1 and SP2, and Windows Server 2003 allows local users to gain privileges via a specially-designed application that provides console window information with a long FaceName value. | 10.0 |
2005-05-02 | CVE-2005-0550 | Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server and Windows XP Buffer overflow in Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP SP1 and SP2, and Windows Server 2003 allows local users to cause a denial of service (i.e., system crash) via a malformed request, aka "Object Management Vulnerability". | 2.1 |