Vulnerabilities > IBM > Lotus Notes > Medium
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-04-23 | CVE-2014-0892 | Information Exposure vulnerability in IBM Lotus Domino and Lotus Notes IBM Notes and Domino 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP6 IF3 and 9.x before 9.0.1 FP1 on 32-bit Linux platforms use incorrect gcc options, which makes it easier for remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging the absence of the NX protection mechanism and placing crafted x86 code on the stack, aka SPR KLYH9GGS9W. | 5.0 |
| 2013-05-10 | CVE-2013-2977 | Numeric Errors vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes Integer overflow in IBM Notes 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP4 Interim Fix 1 and 9.x before 9.0 Interim Fix 1 on Windows, and 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP5 and 9.x before 9.0.1 on Linux, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed PNG image in a previewed e-mail message, aka SPR NPEI96K82Q. | 6.8 |
| 2013-05-01 | CVE-2013-0538 | Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 8.x before 8.5.3 FP4 Interim Fix 1 and 9.0 before Interim Fix 1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a SCRIPT element in an HTML e-mail message, aka SPRs JMOY95BLM6 and JMOY95BN49. | 4.3 |
| 2013-05-01 | CVE-2013-0127 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes IBM Lotus Notes 8.x before 8.5.3 FP4 Interim Fix 1 and 9.0 before Interim Fix 1 does not block APPLET elements in HTML e-mail, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions on Java code execution and X-Confirm-Reading-To functionality via a crafted message, aka SPRs JMOY95BLM6 and JMOY95BN49. | 5.8 |
| 2012-12-19 | CVE-2012-4846 | Information Exposure vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes IBM Lotus Notes 8.5.x before 8.5.3 FP3 does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for a web-application cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie, aka SPRs JMAS7TRNLN and SRAO8U3Q68. | 4.3 |
| 2012-09-07 | CVE-2010-5251 | Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 8.5 Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Notes 8.5 allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse (1) nnoteswc.dll or (2) nlsxbe.dll file in the current working directory, as demonstrated by a directory that contains a .vcf, .vcs, or .ics file. local ibm | 6.9 |
| 2008-02-21 | CVE-2008-0862 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, and 8.0 signs an unsigned applet when a user forwards an email message to another user, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass Execution Control List (ECL) protection. | 4.3 |
| 2007-12-28 | CVE-2007-6594 | Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes IBM Lotus Notes 8 for Linux before 8.0.1 uses (1) unspecified weak permissions for the installation kit obtained through a Notes 8 download and (2) 0777 permissions for the installdata file that is created by setup.sh, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse file. | 6.9 |
| 2007-04-11 | CVE-2007-1941 | HTML Injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Domino Web Access Active Content Filter Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Active Content Filter feature in Domino Web Access (DWA) in IBM Lotus Notes before 6.5.6 and 7.x before 7.0.2 FP1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a multipart/related e-mail message, a different issue than CVE-2006-4843. network ibm | 4.3 |
| 2006-11-10 | CVE-2006-5835 | Information Disclosure vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes User.ID File Key The Notes Remote Procedure Call (NRPC) protocol in IBM Lotus Notes Domino before 6.5.5 FP2 and 7.x before 7.0.2 does not require authentication to perform user lookups, which allows remote attackers to obtain the user ID file. | 5.0 |