Vulnerabilities > Fedoraproject > High
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-05 | CVE-2020-10543 | Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in multiple products Perl before 5.30.3 on 32-bit platforms allows a heap-based buffer overflow because nested regular expression quantifiers have an integer overflow. | 8.2 |
| 2020-06-04 | CVE-2020-13692 | XXE vulnerability in multiple products PostgreSQL JDBC Driver (aka PgJDBC) before 42.2.13 allows XXE. | 7.7 |
| 2020-06-04 | CVE-2020-13777 | Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in multiple products GnuTLS 3.6.x before 3.6.14 uses incorrect cryptography for encrypting a session ticket (a loss of confidentiality in TLS 1.2, and an authentication bypass in TLS 1.3). | 7.4 |
| 2020-06-03 | CVE-2020-11080 | In nghttp2 before version 1.41.0, the overly large HTTP/2 SETTINGS frame payload causes denial of service. | 7.5 |
| 2020-06-03 | CVE-2020-13379 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in multiple products The avatar feature in Grafana 3.0.1 through 7.0.1 has an SSRF Incorrect Access Control issue. | 8.2 |
| 2020-06-01 | CVE-2020-13757 | Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in multiple products Python-RSA before 4.1 ignores leading '\0' bytes during decryption of ciphertext. | 7.5 |
| 2020-05-27 | CVE-2020-10936 | Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in multiple products Sympa before 6.2.56 allows privilege escalation. | 7.8 |
| 2020-05-27 | CVE-2020-13630 | Use After Free vulnerability in multiple products ext/fts3/fts3.c in SQLite before 3.32.0 has a use-after-free in fts3EvalNextRow, related to the snippet feature. | 7.0 |
| 2020-05-25 | CVE-2020-13482 | Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in multiple products EM-HTTP-Request 1.1.5 uses the library eventmachine in an insecure way that allows an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack against users of the library. | 7.4 |
| 2020-05-22 | CVE-2020-11077 | In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. | 7.5 |