Vulnerabilities > F5 > BIG IP Advanced WEB Application Firewall > Medium
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-31 | CVE-2021-22998 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.3, SYN flood protection thresholds are not enforced in secure network address translation (SNAT) listeners. | 5.3 |
| 2021-03-31 | CVE-2021-22994 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.3, undisclosed endpoints in iControl REST allow for a reflected XSS attack, which could lead to a complete compromise of the BIG-IP system if the victim user is granted the admin role. | 6.1 |
| 2021-02-12 | CVE-2021-22984 | Open Redirect vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP Advanced WAF and ASM version 15.1.x before 15.1.0.2, 15.0.x before 15.0.1.4, 14.1.x before 14.1.2.5, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.4, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.2, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.2, when receiving a unauthenticated client request with a maliciously crafted URI, a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM virtual server configured with a DoS profile with Proactive Bot Defense (versions prior to 14.1.0), or a Bot Defense profile (versions 14.1.0 and later), may subject clients and web servers to Open Redirection attacks. | 6.1 |
| 2021-02-12 | CVE-2021-22981 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 products On all versions of BIG-IP 12.1.x and 11.6.x, the original TLS protocol includes a weakness in the master secret negotiation that is mitigated by the Extended Master Secret (EMS) extension defined in RFC 7627. | 4.8 |
| 2021-02-12 | CVE-2021-22979 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.2.8, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.5, and all 12.1.x versions, a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility when Fraud Protection Service is provisioned and allows an attacker to execute JavaScript in the context of the current logged-in user. | 6.1 |
| 2020-12-24 | CVE-2020-27719 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, and 14.1.0-14.1.3, a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. | 6.1 |
| 2020-11-19 | CVE-2020-5947 | Unspecified vulnerability in F5 products In versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1 and 15.1.0-15.1.1, on specific BIG-IP platforms, attackers may be able to obtain TCP sequence numbers from the BIG-IP system that can be reused in future connections with the same source and destination port and IP numbers. | 4.3 |
| 2020-11-05 | CVE-2020-5943 | Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in F5 products In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. | 6.5 |
| 2020-10-29 | CVE-2020-5938 | Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in F5 products On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, when negotiating IPSec tunnels with configured, authenticated peers, the peer may negotiate a different key length than the BIG-IP configuration would otherwise allow. | 6.5 |
| 2020-09-25 | CVE-2020-5929 | Information Exposure Through Discrepancy vulnerability in F5 products In versions 13.0.0-13.0.0 HF2, 12.1.0-12.1.2 HF1, and 11.6.1-11.6.2, BIG-IP platforms with Cavium Nitrox SSL hardware acceleration cards, a Virtual Server configured with a Client SSL profile, and using Anonymous (ADH) or Ephemeral (DHE) Diffie-Hellman key exchange and Single DH use option not enabled in the options list may be vulnerable to crafted SSL/TLS Handshakes that may result with a PMS (Pre-Master Secret) that starts in a 0 byte and may lead to a recovery of plaintext messages as BIG-IP TLS/SSL ADH/DHE sends different error messages acting as an oracle. | 5.9 |