Vulnerabilities > Cisco
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-02 | CVE-2024-20523 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Cisco products A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV042, RV042G, RV320, and RV325 Routers could allow an authenticated, Administrator-level, remote attacker to cause an unexpected reload of an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. | 6.8 |
| 2024-10-02 | CVE-2024-20524 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Cisco products A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV042, RV042G, RV320, and RV325 Routers could allow an authenticated, Administrator-level, remote attacker to cause an unexpected reload of an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. | 6.8 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20414 | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE A vulnerability in the web UI feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system through the web UI. This vulnerability is due to incorrectly accepting configuration changes through the HTTP GET method. | 6.5 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20433 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Cisco IOS A vulnerability in the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) feature of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow when processing crafted RSVP packets. | 7.5 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20434 | Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE A vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the control plane of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of frames with VLAN tag information. | 4.3 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20436 | NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE A vulnerability in the HTTP Server feature of Cisco IOS XE Software when the Telephony Service feature is enabled could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a null pointer dereference when accessing specific URLs. | 7.5 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20437 | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and execute commands on the CLI of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. | 8.8 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20455 | Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE A vulnerability in the process that classifies traffic that is going to the Unified Threat Defense (UTD) component of Cisco IOS XE Software in controller mode could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability exists because UTD improperly handles certain packets as those packets egress an SD-WAN IPsec tunnel. | 8.6 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20464 | Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE 17.13.1/17.13.1A A vulnerability in the Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of received IPv4 PIMv2 packets. | 8.6 |
| 2024-09-25 | CVE-2024-20465 | Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) programming of Cisco IOS Software running on Cisco Industrial Ethernet 4000, 4010, and 5000 Series Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured ACL. This vulnerability is due to the incorrect handling of IPv4 ACLs on switched virtual interfaces when an administrator enables and disables Resilient Ethernet Protocol (REP). | 5.8 |