Vulnerabilities > Cisco > IOS XR > 7.1.1
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-06 | CVE-2020-3284 | Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco products A vulnerability in the enhanced Preboot eXecution Environment (PXE) boot loader for Cisco IOS XR 64-bit Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unsigned code during the PXE boot process on an affected device. | 9.8 |
| 2020-09-04 | CVE-2020-3530 | Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR A vulnerability in task group assignment for a specific CLI command in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute that command, even though administrative privileges should be required. | 8.4 |
| 2020-09-04 | CVE-2020-3473 | Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR A vulnerability in task group assignment for a specific CLI command in Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an authenticated, local CLI shell user to elevate privileges and gain full administrative control of the device. | 7.8 |
| 2020-08-17 | CVE-2020-3449 | Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR A vulnerability in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) additional paths feature of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to prevent authorized users from monitoring the BGP status and cause the BGP process to stop processing new updates, resulting in a denial of service (DOS) condition. | 4.3 |
| 2020-06-18 | CVE-2020-3364 | Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Cisco IOS XR A vulnerability in the access control list (ACL) functionality of the standby route processor management interface of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to reach the configured IP addresses on the standby route processor management Gigabit Ethernet Management interface. | 5.3 |
| 2019-05-13 | CVE-2019-1649 | Improper Locking vulnerability in Cisco products A vulnerability in the logic that handles access control to one of the hardware components in Cisco's proprietary Secure Boot implementation could allow an authenticated, local attacker to write a modified firmware image to the component. | 6.7 |