Vulnerabilities > Out-of-bounds Write
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2024-05-27 | CVE-2024-3933 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Eclipse Openj9 In Eclipse OpenJ9 release versions prior to 0.44.0 and after 0.13.0, when running with JVM option -Xgc:concurrentScavenge, the sequence generated for System.arrayCopy on the IBM Z platform with hardware and software support for guarded storage [1], could allow access to a buffer with an incorrect length value when executing an arraycopy sequence while the Concurrent Scavenge Garbage Collection cycle is active and the source and destination memory regions for arraycopy overlap. | 7.3 |
2024-05-22 | CVE-2024-5160 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in multiple products Heap buffer overflow in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 125.0.6422.76 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory write via a crafted HTML page. | 8.8 |
2024-05-22 | CVE-2021-47489 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Linux Kernel In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Fix even more out of bound writes from debugfs CVE-2021-42327 was fixed by: commit f23750b5b3d98653b31d4469592935ef6364ad67 Author: Thelford Williams <[email protected]> Date: Wed Oct 13 16:04:13 2021 -0400 drm/amdgpu: fix out of bounds write but amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c contains more of the same issue so fix the remaining ones. v2: * Add missing fix in dp_max_bpc_write (Harry Wentland) | 7.8 |
2024-05-21 | CVE-2024-22273 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in VMWare products The storage controllers on VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion have out-of-bounds read/write vulnerability. A malicious actor with access to a virtual machine with storage controllers enabled may exploit this issue to create a denial of service condition or execute code on the hypervisor from a virtual machine in conjunction with other issues. | 7.8 |
2024-05-21 | CVE-2021-47282 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Linux Kernel In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spi: bcm2835: Fix out-of-bounds access with more than 4 slaves Commit 571e31fa60b3 ("spi: bcm2835: Cache CS register value for ->prepare_message()") limited the number of slaves to 3 at compile-time. The limitation was necessitated by a statically-sized array prepare_cs[] in the driver private data which contains a per-slave register value. The commit sought to enforce the limitation at run-time by setting the controller's num_chipselect to 3: Slaves with a higher chipselect are rejected by spi_add_device(). However the commit neglected that num_chipselect only limits the number of *native* chipselects. | 7.8 |
2024-05-21 | CVE-2021-47286 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Linux Kernel In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bus: mhi: core: Validate channel ID when processing command completions MHI reads the channel ID from the event ring element sent by the device which can be any value between 0 and 255. | 7.8 |
2024-05-21 | CVE-2021-47404 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Linux Kernel In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: betop: fix slab-out-of-bounds Write in betop_probe Syzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds Write bug in hid-betopff driver. The problem is the driver assumes the device must have an input report but some malicious devices violate this assumption. So this patch checks hid_device's input is non empty before it's been used. | 7.8 |
2024-05-20 | CVE-2024-4323 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Treasuredata Fluent BIT A memory corruption vulnerability in Fluent Bit versions 2.0.7 thru 3.0.3. | 9.8 |
2024-05-16 | CVE-2024-30274 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Adobe Substance 3D Painter Substance3D - Painter versions 9.1.2 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. | 7.8 |
2024-05-15 | CVE-2024-4976 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in Xpdfreader Xpdf Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 and earlier, due to missing object type check in AcroForm field reference. | 5.5 |