Vulnerabilities > Canonical > Ubuntu Linux > 21.04
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32547 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32548 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32549 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32550 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32551 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32552 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32553 | Link Following vulnerability in multiple products It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32554 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-12 | CVE-2021-32555 | Link Following vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Linux It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. | 5.5 |
| 2021-06-04 | CVE-2021-3489 | Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in multiple products The eBPF RINGBUF bpf_ringbuf_reserve() function in the Linux kernel did not check that the allocated size was smaller than the ringbuf size, allowing an attacker to perform out-of-bounds writes within the kernel and therefore, arbitrary code execution. | 7.8 |