Vulnerabilities > Bouncycastle
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2017-12-13 | CVE-2017-13098 | Information Exposure Through Discrepancy vulnerability in Bouncycastle Legion-Of-The-Bouncy-Castle-Java-Crytography-Api BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. | 4.3 |
2016-04-18 | CVE-2016-2427 | Information Exposure vulnerability in multiple products The AES-GCM specification in RFC 5084, as used in Android 5.x and 6.x, recommends 12 octets for the aes-ICVlen parameter field, which might make it easier for attackers to defeat a cryptographic protection mechanism and discover an authentication key via a crafted application, aka internal bug 26234568. | 5.5 |
2015-11-09 | CVE-2015-7940 | Information Exposure vulnerability in multiple products The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." | 5.0 |
2013-02-08 | CVE-2013-1624 | Cryptographic Issues vulnerability in Bouncycastle products The TLS implementation in the Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.48 and C# library before 1.8 does not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169. | 4.0 |
2009-03-30 | CVE-2007-6721 | Unspecified vulnerability in Bouncycastle products The Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography API before release 1.38, as used in Crypto Provider Package before 1.36, has unknown impact and remote attack vectors related to "a Bleichenbacher vulnerability in simple RSA CMS signatures without signed attributes." | 10.0 |