Vulnerabilities > Apple > Cups > Medium
DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
---|---|---|---|
2009-04-23 | CVE-2009-0147 | Numeric Errors vulnerability in multiple products Multiple integer overflows in the JBIG2 decoder in Xpdf 3.02pl2 and earlier, CUPS 1.3.9 and earlier, and other products allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted PDF file, related to (1) JBIG2Stream::readSymbolDictSeg, (2) JBIG2Stream::readSymbolDictSeg, and (3) JBIG2Stream::readGenericBitmap. | 4.3 |
2009-04-23 | CVE-2009-0146 | Improper Restriction of Operations Within the Bounds of A Memory Buffer vulnerability in multiple products Multiple buffer overflows in the JBIG2 decoder in Xpdf 3.02pl2 and earlier, CUPS 1.3.9 and earlier, and other products allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted PDF file, related to (1) JBIG2SymbolDict::setBitmap and (2) JBIG2Stream::readSymbolDictSeg. | 4.3 |
2009-01-27 | CVE-2009-0032 | Link Following vulnerability in Apple Cups CUPS on Mandriva Linux 2008.0, 2008.1, 2009.0, Corporate Server (CS) 3.0 and 4.0, and Multi Network Firewall (MNF) 2.0 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the /tmp/pdf.log temporary file. | 6.9 |
2008-12-08 | CVE-2008-5377 | Link Following vulnerability in Apple Cups 1.3.8 pstopdf in CUPS 1.3.8 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the /tmp/pstopdf.log temporary file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2001-1333. | 6.9 |
2008-10-14 | CVE-2008-3640 | Numeric Errors vulnerability in Apple Cups Integer overflow in the WriteProlog function in texttops in CUPS before 1.3.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PostScript file that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | 6.8 |
2007-07-27 | CVE-2007-4045 | The CUPS service, as used in SUSE Linux before 20070720 and other Linux distributions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors related to an incomplete fix for CVE-2007-0720 that introduced a different denial of service problem in SSL negotiation. | 5.0 |