Vulnerabilities > CVE-2020-6495 - Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in multiple products
Attack vector
NETWORK Attack complexity
LOW Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
NONE Integrity impact
HIGH Availability impact
NONE Summary
Insufficient policy enforcement in developer tools in Google Chrome prior to 83.0.4103.97 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted Chrome Extension.
Vulnerable Configurations
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by the authorization framework, whose job it is to map ACLs to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application or can run queries for data that he is otherwise not supposed to.
- Directory Indexing An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.
- Footprinting An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
- Embedding Scripts within Scripts An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts. The attacker leverages this capability to execute scripts to execute his/her own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute. The attacker must have the ability to inject script into script that is likely to be executed. If this is done, then the attacker can potentially launch a variety of probes and attacks against the web server's local environment, in many cases the so-called DMZ, back end resources the web server can communicate with, and other hosts. With the proliferation of intermediaries, such as Web App Firewalls, network devices, and even printers having JVMs and Web servers, there are many locales where an attacker can inject malicious scripts. Since this attack pattern defines scripts within scripts, there are likely privileges to execute said attack on the host. Of course, these attacks are not solely limited to the server side, client side scripts like Ajax and client side JavaScript can contain malicious scripts as well. In general all that is required is for there to be sufficient privileges to execute a script, but not protected against writing.
- Web Logs Tampering Web Logs Tampering attacks involve an attacker injecting, deleting or otherwise tampering with the contents of web logs typically for the purposes of masking other malicious behavior. Additionally, writing malicious data to log files may target jobs, filters, reports, and other agents that process the logs in an asynchronous attack pattern. This pattern of attack is similar to "Log Injection-Tampering-Forging" except that in this case, the attack is targeting the logs of the web server and not the application.
Nessus
NASL family FreeBSD Local Security Checks NASL id FREEBSD_PKG_A2CAF7BDA71911EAA857E09467587C17.NASL description Chrome Releases reports : This update includes 5 security fixes. Below, we highlight fixes that were contributed by external researchers. - [1082105] High CVE-2020-6493: Use after free in WebAuthentication. Reported by Anonymous on 2020-05-13 - [1083972] High CVE-2020-6494: Incorrect security UI in payments. Reported by Juho Nurminen on 2020-05-18 - [1072116] High CVE-2020-6495: Insufficient policy enforcement in developer tools. Reported by David Erceg on 2020-04-18 - [1085990] High CVE-2020-6496: Use after free in payments. Reported by Khalil Zhani on 2020-05-24 last seen 2020-06-11 modified 2020-06-08 plugin id 137216 published 2020-06-08 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/137216 title FreeBSD : chromium -- multiple vulnerabilities (a2caf7bd-a719-11ea-a857-e09467587c17) NASL family Windows NASL id GOOGLE_CHROME_83_0_4103_97.NASL description The version of Google Chrome installed on the remote Windows host is prior to 83.0.4103.97. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the 2020_06_stable-channel-update-for-desktop advisory. Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application last seen 2020-06-10 modified 2020-06-03 plugin id 137081 published 2020-06-03 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/137081 title Google Chrome < 83.0.4103.97 Multiple Vulnerabilities NASL family MacOS X Local Security Checks NASL id MACOSX_GOOGLE_CHROME_83_0_4103_97.NASL description The version of Google Chrome installed on the remote macOS host is prior to 83.0.4103.97. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the 2020_06_stable-channel-update-for-desktop advisory. Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application last seen 2020-06-10 modified 2020-06-03 plugin id 137080 published 2020-06-03 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/137080 title Google Chrome < 83.0.4103.97 Multiple Vulnerabilities
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00034.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00034.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00038.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-06/msg00038.html
- https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2020/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html
- https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2020/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html
- https://crbug.com/1072116
- https://crbug.com/1072116
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-02
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-02
- https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4714
- https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4714