Vulnerabilities > CVE-2019-7839 - Command Injection vulnerability in Adobe Coldfusion 11.0/2016/2018

047910
CVSS 9.8 - CRITICAL
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
HIGH
Integrity impact
HIGH
Availability impact
HIGH
network
low complexity
adobe
CWE-77
critical
nessus

Summary

ColdFusion versions Update 3 and earlier, Update 10 and earlier, and Update 18 and earlier have a command injection vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Adobe
34

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Cause Web Server Misclassification
    An attack of this type exploits a Web server's decision to take action based on filename or file extension. Because different file types are handled by different server processes, misclassification may force the Web server to take unexpected action, or expected actions in an unexpected sequence. This may cause the server to exhaust resources, supply debug or system data to the attacker, or bind an attacker to a remote process. This type of vulnerability has been found in many widely used servers including IIS, Lotus Domino, and Orion. The attacker's job in this case is straightforward, standard communication protocols and methods are used and are generally appended with malicious information at the tail end of an otherwise legitimate request. The attack payload varies, but it could be special characters like a period or simply appending a tag that has a special meaning for operations on the server side like .jsp for a java application server. The essence of this attack is that the attacker deceives the server into executing functionality based on the name of the request, i.e. login.jsp, not the contents.
  • LDAP Injection
    An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
  • Command Delimiters
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or a blacklist input validation, as opposed to whitelist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or blacklist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
  • File System Function Injection, Content Based
    An attack of this type exploits the host's trust in executing remote content including binary files. The files are poisoned with a malicious payload (targeting the file systems accessible by the target software) by the attacker and may be passed through standard channels such as via email, and standard web content like PDF and multimedia files. The attacker exploits known vulnerabilities or handling routines in the target processes. Vulnerabilities of this type have been found in a wide variety of commercial applications from Microsoft Office to Adobe Acrobat and Apple Safari web browser. When the attacker knows the standard handling routines and can identify vulnerabilities and entry points they can be exploited by otherwise seemingly normal content. Once the attack is executed, the attackers' program can access relative directories such as C:\Program Files or other standard system directories to launch further attacks. In a worst case scenario, these programs are combined with other propagation logic and work as a virus.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
    An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.

Nessus

NASL familyWindows
NASL idCOLDFUSION_WIN_APSB19-27.NASL
descriptionThe version of Adobe ColdFusion installed on the remote Windows host is prior to 11.x update 19, 2016.x update 11, or 2018.x update 4. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the APSB19-27 advisory. - File extension blacklist bypass potentially leading to Arbitrary code execution (CVE-2019-7838) - Command Injection potentially leading to Arbitrary code execution (CVE-2019-7839) - Deserialization of untrusted data potentially leading to Arbitrary code execution (CVE-2019-7840) Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id125880
published2019-06-14
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/125880
titleAdobe ColdFusion < 11.x < 11u19 / 2016.x < 2016u11 / 2018.x < 2018u4 Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB19-27)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(125880);
  script_version("1.3");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/10/18 23:14:15");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2019-7838", "CVE-2019-7839", "CVE-2019-7840");

  script_name(english:"Adobe ColdFusion < 11.x < 11u19 / 2016.x < 2016u11 / 2018.x < 2018u4 Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB19-27)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks the hotfix files.");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"A web-based application running on the remote host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The version of Adobe ColdFusion installed on the remote Windows host is prior to 11.x update 19, 2016.x update 11, or
2018.x update 4. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the APSB19-27 advisory.

  - File extension blacklist bypass potentially leading to
    Arbitrary code execution (CVE-2019-7838)

  - Command Injection potentially leading to Arbitrary code
    execution (CVE-2019-7839)

  - Deserialization of untrusted data potentially leading to
    Arbitrary code execution (CVE-2019-7840)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version
number.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb19-27.html");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Update to Adobe ColdFusion version 11 update 19 / 2016 update 11 / 2018 update 4 or later.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H");
  script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2019-7840");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2019/06/11");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2019/06/11");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2019/06/14");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:adobe:coldfusion");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"Windows");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");

  script_dependencies("coldfusion_win_local_detect.nasl");
  script_require_keys("SMB/coldfusion/instance");
  script_require_ports(139, 445);

  exit(0);
}

include('audit.inc');
include('coldfusion_win.inc');
include('global_settings.inc');
include('misc_func.inc');

instances = get_coldfusion_instances(); # this exits if it fails

# Check the hotfixes and cumulative hotfixes
# installed for each instance of ColdFusion.
instance_info = make_list();

foreach name (keys(instances))
{
  info = NULL;
  ver = instances[name];

  if (ver == '11.0.0')
  {
    info = check_jar_chf(name, 19);
  }

  else if (ver == '2016.0.0')
  {
    info = check_jar_chf(name, 11);
  }
  else if (ver == '2018.0.0')
  {
    info = check_jar_chf(name, 4);
  }
  if (!isnull(info))
    instance_info = make_list(instance_info, info);
}

if (max_index(instance_info) == 0)
  audit(AUDIT_INST_VER_NOT_VULN, 'Adobe ColdFusion');

port = get_kb_item('SMB/transport');
if (!port)
  port = 445;

report =
  '\n' + 'Nessus detected the following unpatched instances :' +
  '\n' + join(instance_info, sep:'\n') +
  '\n';

security_report_v4(port:port, extra:report, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);

The Hacker News

idTHN:C9C46E3C63DA812F6C22E297AB5F14C3
last seen2019-06-11
modified2019-06-11
published2019-06-11
reporterThe Hacker News
sourcehttps://thehackernews.com/2019/06/adobe-patch-june.html
titleAdobe Issues Critical Patches for ColdFusion, Flash Player, Campaign