Vulnerabilities > CVE-2018-11775 - Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in multiple products
Attack vector
NETWORK Attack complexity
HIGH Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
HIGH Integrity impact
HIGH Availability impact
NONE Summary
TLS hostname verification when using the Apache ActiveMQ Client before 5.15.6 was missing which could make the client vulnerable to a MITM attack between a Java application using the ActiveMQ client and the ActiveMQ server. This is now enabled by default.
Vulnerable Configurations
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Creating a Rogue Certificate Authority Certificate An attacker exploits a weakness in the MD5 hash algorithm (weak collision resistance) to generate a certificate signing request (CSR) that contains collision blocks in the "to be signed" part. The attacker specially crafts two different, but valid X.509 certificates that when hashed with the MD5 algorithm would yield the same value. The attacker then sends the CSR for one of the certificates to the Certification Authority which uses the MD5 hashing algorithm. That request is completely valid and the Certificate Authority issues an X.509 certificate to the attacker which is signed with its private key. An attacker then takes that signed blob and inserts it into another X.509 certificate that the attacker generated. Due to the MD5 collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the attackers' second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority. To make the attack more interesting, the second certificate could be not just a regular certificate, but rather itself a signing certificate. Thus the attacker is able to start their own Certification Authority that is anchored in its root of trust in the legitimate Certification Authority that has signed the attackers' first X.509 certificate. If the original Certificate Authority was accepted by default by browsers, so will now the Certificate Authority set up by the attacker and of course any certificates that it signs. So the attacker is now able to generate any SSL certificates to impersonate any web server, and the user's browser will not issue any warning to the victim. This can be used to compromise HTTPS communications and other types of systems where PKI and X.509 certificates may be used (e.g., VPN, IPSec) .
Nessus
NASL family Misc. NASL id ORACLE_ENTERPRISE_MANAGER_JUL_2019_CPU.NASL description The version of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control installed on the remote host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities in Enterprise Manager Base Platform component: - An unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component of Oracle Enterprise Manager Products Suite (subcomponent: Connector Framework (Apache CXF)), which could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to compromise Enterprise Manager Base Platform. (CVE-2018-8039) - An unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform component of Oracle Enterprise Manager Products Suite (subcomponent: Valid Session (Apache ActiveMQ)), which could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to compromise Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. (CVE-2019-0222) - An unspecified vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager Base Platform component of Oracle Enterprise Manager Products Suite (subcomponent: Discovery Framework (OpenSSL)), which could allow and unauthenticated, remote attacker to compromise Enterprise Manager Base Platform. (CVE-2019-1559) last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 126775 published 2019-07-17 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/126775 title Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control (Jul 2019 CPU) NASL family CGI abuses NASL id ACTIVEMQ_5_15_6.NASL description The version of Apache ActiveMQ running on the remote host is 5.x prior to 5.15.6. It is, therefore, affected by a flaw related to TLS hostname verification and ActiveMQ Client that allows man-in-the-middle attacks. last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 117483 published 2018-09-14 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2018-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/117483 title Apache ActiveMQ Client 5.x < 5.15.6 TLS Hostname Verification Weakness
Redhat
advisories |
|
References
- http://activemq.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2018-11775-announcement.txt
- http://activemq.apache.org/security-advisories.data/CVE-2018-11775-announcement.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105335
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105335
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041618
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041618
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/03f91b1fb85686a848cee6b90112cf6059bd1b21b23bacaa11a962e1%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/03f91b1fb85686a848cee6b90112cf6059bd1b21b23bacaa11a962e1%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5c0039197a4949f29e1e2c9441ab38d242946b966f61c110808bcc%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5c0039197a4949f29e1e2c9441ab38d242946b966f61c110808bcc%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a859563f05fbe7c31916b3178c2697165bd9bbf5a65d1cf62aef27d2%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a859563f05fbe7c31916b3178c2697165bd9bbf5a65d1cf62aef27d2%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fcbe6ad00f1de142148c20d813fae3765dc4274955e3e2f3ca19ff7b%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fcbe6ad00f1de142148c20d813fae3765dc4274955e3e2f3ca19ff7b%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb698ed085f79e56146ca24ab359c9ef95846618675ea1ef402e04a6d%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb698ed085f79e56146ca24ab359c9ef95846618675ea1ef402e04a6d%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00005.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00005.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html
- https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html