Vulnerabilities > CVE-2017-2862 - Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in multiple products
Attack vector
LOCAL Attack complexity
LOW Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
HIGH Integrity impact
HIGH Availability impact
HIGH Summary
An exploitable heap overflow vulnerability exists in the gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment functionality of Gdk-Pixbuf 2.36.6. A specially crafted jpeg file can cause a heap overflow resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a file or url to trigger this vulnerability.
Vulnerable Configurations
Part | Description | Count |
---|---|---|
Application | 1 | |
OS | 1 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Nessus
NASL family Debian Local Security Checks NASL id DEBIAN_DSA-3978.NASL description Marcin Noga discovered a buffer overflow in the JPEG loader of the GDK Pixbuf library, which may result in the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed file is opened. last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 103312 published 2017-09-19 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2017-2018 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/103312 title Debian DSA-3978-1 : gdk-pixbuf - security update NASL family Debian Local Security Checks NASL id DEBIAN_DLA-1100.NASL description Marcin Noga discovered a buffer overflow in the JPEG loader of the GDK Pixbuf library, which may result in the execution of arbitrary code if a malformed file is opened. For Debian 7 last seen 2020-03-17 modified 2017-09-20 plugin id 103330 published 2017-09-20 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2017-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/103330 title Debian DLA-1100-1 : gdk-pixbuf security update NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks NASL id UBUNTU_USN-3418-1.NASL description It was discovered that the GDK-PixBuf library did not properly handle certain jpeg images. If an user or automated system were tricked into opening a specially crafted jpeg file, a remote attacker could use this flaw to cause GDK-PixBuf to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-2862) It was discovered that the GDK-PixBuf library did not properly handle certain tiff images. If an user or automated system were tricked into opening a specially crafted tiff file, a remote attacker could use this flaw to cause GDK-PixBuf to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-2870) Ariel Zelivansky discovered that the GDK-PixBuf library did not properly handle printing certain error messages. If an user or automated system were tricked into opening a specially crafted image file, a remote attacker could use this flaw to cause GDK-PixBuf to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2017-6311). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues. last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 103320 published 2017-09-19 reporter Ubuntu Security Notice (C) 2017-2019 Canonical, Inc. / NASL script (C) 2017-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/103320 title Ubuntu 14.04 LTS / 16.04 LTS / 17.04 : gdk-pixbuf vulnerabilities (USN-3418-1) NASL family Huawei Local Security Checks NASL id EULEROS_SA-2018-1045.NASL description According to the versions of the gdk-pixbuf2 packages installed, the EulerOS installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities : - gdk-pixbuf is an image loading library that can be extended by loadable modules for new image formats. It is used by toolkits such as GTK+ or clutter.Security Fix(es):An exploitable heap overflow vulnerability exists in the gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment functionality of Gdk-Pixbuf 2.36.6. A specially crafted jpeg file can cause a heap overflow resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a file or url to trigger this vulnerability.(CVE-2017-2862)An exploitable integer overflow vulnerability exists in the tiff_image_parse functionality of Gdk-Pixbuf 2.36.6 when compiled with Clang. A specially crafted tiff file can cause a heap-overflow resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a file or a URL to trigger this vulnerability.(CVE-2017-2870)Gnome gdk-pixbuf 2.36.8 and older is vulnerable to several integer overflow in the gif_get_lzw function resulting in memory corruption and potential code execution.(CVE-2017-1000422) Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues. last seen 2020-06-03 modified 2018-02-13 plugin id 106773 published 2018-02-13 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2018-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/106773 title EulerOS 2.0 SP1 : gdk-pixbuf2 (EulerOS-SA-2018-1045) NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks NASL id SUSE_SU-2018-2470-1.NASL description This update for gtk2 provides the following fixes: These security issues were fixed : - CVE-2017-6312: Prevent integer overflow that allowed context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and application crash) via a crafted image entry offset in an ICO file (bsc#1027026). - CVE-2017-6314: The make_available_at_least function allowed context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a large TIFF file (bsc#1027025). - CVE-2017-6313: Prevent integer underflow in the load_resources function that allowed context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and program crash) via a crafted image entry size in an ICO file (bsc#1027024). - CVE-2017-2862: Prevent heap overflow in the gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment function. A specially crafted jpeg file could have caused a heap overflow resulting in remote code execution (bsc#1048289) - CVE-2017-2870: Prevent integer overflow in the tiff_image_parse functionality. A specially crafted tiff file could have caused a heap-overflow resulting in remote code execution (bsc#1048544). The update package also includes non-security fixes. See advisory for details. Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the SUSE security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues. last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 112057 published 2018-08-22 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2018-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/112057 title SUSE SLES11 Security Update : gtk2 (SUSE-SU-2018:2470-1) NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks NASL id SUSE_SU-2017-2381-1.NASL description This update for gdk-pixbuf fixes the following issues : - CVE-2017-2862: JPEG gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment Code Execution Vulnerability (bsc#1048289) - CVE-2017-2870: tiff_image_parse Code Execution Vulnerability (bsc#1048544) - CVE-2017-6313: A dangerous integer underflow in io-icns.c (bsc#1027024) - CVE-2017-6314: Infinite loop in io-tiff.c (bsc#1027025) - CVE-2017-6312: Out-of-bounds read on io-ico.c (bsc#1027026) Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the SUSE security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues. last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 102990 published 2017-09-07 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2017-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/102990 title SUSE SLED12 / SLES12 Security Update : gdk-pixbuf (SUSE-SU-2017:2381-1) NASL family Huawei Local Security Checks NASL id EULEROS_SA-2018-1046.NASL description According to the versions of the gdk-pixbuf2 packages installed, the EulerOS installation on the remote host is affected by the following vulnerabilities : - An exploitable heap overflow vulnerability exists in the gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment functionality of Gdk-Pixbuf 2.36.6. A specially crafted jpeg file can cause a heap overflow resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a file or url to trigger this vulnerability.i1/4^CVE-2017-2862i1/4%0 - An exploitable integer overflow vulnerability exists in the tiff_image_parse functionality of Gdk-Pixbuf 2.36.6 when compiled with Clang. A specially crafted tiff file can cause a heap-overflow resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a file or a URL to trigger this vulnerability.i1/4^CVE-2017-2870i1/4%0 - Gnome gdk-pixbuf 2.36.8 and older is vulnerable to several integer overflow in the gif_get_lzw function resulting in memory corruption and potential code executioni1/4^CVE-2017-1000422i1/4%0 Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the EulerOS security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues. last seen 2020-06-10 modified 2018-02-13 plugin id 106774 published 2018-02-13 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2018-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/106774 title EulerOS 2.0 SP2 : gdk-pixbuf2 (EulerOS-SA-2018-1046) NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks NASL id OPENSUSE-2017-1024.NASL description This update for gdk-pixbuf fixes the following issues : - CVE-2017-2862: JPEG gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment Code Execution Vulnerability (bsc#1048289) - CVE-2017-2870: tiff_image_parse Code Execution Vulnerability (bsc#1048544) - CVE-2017-6313: A dangerous integer underflow in io-icns.c (bsc#1027024) - CVE-2017-6314: Infinite loop in io-tiff.c (bsc#1027025) - CVE-2017-6312: Out-of-bounds read on io-ico.c (bsc#1027026) This update was imported from the SUSE:SLE-12-SP2:Update update project. last seen 2020-06-05 modified 2017-09-13 plugin id 103160 published 2017-09-13 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2017-2020 Tenable Network Security, Inc. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/103160 title openSUSE Security Update : gdk-pixbuf (openSUSE-2017-1024) NASL family FreeBSD Local Security Checks NASL id FREEBSD_PKG_5A1F1A868F4C11E7B5AFA4BADB2F4699.NASL description TALOS reports : - An exploitable integer overflow vulnerability exists in the tiff_image_parse functionality. - An exploitable heap-overflow vulnerability exists in the gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment functionality. last seen 2020-06-01 modified 2020-06-02 plugin id 102939 published 2017-09-05 reporter This script is Copyright (C) 2017-2018 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/102939 title FreeBSD : gdk-pixbuf -- multiple vulnerabilities (5a1f1a86-8f4c-11e7-b5af-a4badb2f4699)
Seebug
bulletinFamily | exploit |
description | ### Summary An exploitable heap overflow vulnerability exists in the gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment functionality of Gdk-Pixbuf 2.36.6. A specially crafted jpeg file can cause a heap overflow resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a file or url to trigger this vulnerability. ### Tested Versions Gdk-Pixbuf 2.36.6 commit: aba8d88798dfc2f3856ea0ddda14b06174bbb2bc libjpeg-turbo 1.5.2 ### Product URLs https://developer.gnome.org/gdk-pixbuf/ ### CVSSv3 Score 8.8 - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H ### CWE CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size ### Details ``` Gdk-Pixbuf is a toolkit for image loading and pixel buffer manipulation used in various type of desktop applications: image viewers(GNOME thumbnailer), web browser (Chromium, Firefox),media players (VLC), (...). ``` A vulnerability exists in the JPEG parser: it's based on wrong calculation size for an output buffer in the `gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment` function which later causes a heap overflow during file content conversion inside libjpeg `null_convert` function. Because the file necessary to trigger this vulnerability is quite small we can present its entire content here: ``` Offset 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 00000000 FF D8 FF DB 00 43 01 28 2D 8C A5 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 ˇÿˇ€.C.(-啯¯¯¯¯ 00000010 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ 00000020 F8 F8 64 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 F8 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 ¯¯d¯¯¯¯¯¯....... 00000030 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 ................ 00000040 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 FF CA 00 23 08 00 01 00 2F .......ˇ .#..../ 00000050 09 01 11 01 02 11 01 03 11 01 FF 32 11 11 11 11 ..........ˇ2.... 00000060 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 22 41 FF ............."Aˇ 00000070 DA 00 0C 03 01 10 02 11 03 00 00 00 03 01 00 02 ⁄............... 00000080 11 FF 80 00 .ˇÄ. ``` We can notice that there are a couple JPEG markers but we will focus on the one directly related with vulnerability. That marker is 0xFFCA which starts at offset : 0x47 and has a size of 0x23 bytes. Below are important values read from this section (marker): ``` cinfo { ... data_precision = 0x8, image_width = 0x2f, image_height = 0x1, num_components = 0x9, ... output_width = 0x2f, output_height = 0x1, out_color_components = 0x9, output_components = 0x9, } ------------- line 255 jdmarker.c ------------------- INPUT_BYTE(cinfo, cinfo->data_precision, return FALSE); INPUT_2BYTES(cinfo, cinfo->image_height, return FALSE); INPUT_2BYTES(cinfo, cinfo->image_width, return FALSE); INPUT_BYTE(cinfo, cinfo->num_components, return FALSE); --------------------------------------------------------- ``` To observe how the vulnerability manifests itself, we will use the `pixuf-read` test application and our malicious JPEG as input file. Executed under `valgrind` control we see the following output: ``` ==5058== Invalid write of size 1 ==5058== at 0x75278C7: null_convert (jdcolor.c:408) ==5058== by 0x753F506: sep_upsample (jdsample.c:98) ==5058== by 0x7530660: process_data_simple_main (jdmainct.c:311) ==5058== by 0x75234A5: jpeg_read_scanlines (jdapistd.c:282) ==5058== by 0x72F64AA: gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_lines (io-jpeg.c:901) ==5058== by 0x72F6FB2: gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment (io-jpeg.c:1201) ==5058== by 0x4E4B44C: gdk_pixbuf_loader_load_module (gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:443) ==5058== by 0x4E4BE23: gdk_pixbuf_loader_close (gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:811) ==5058== by 0x400AA0: test_loader (pixbuf-read.c:35) ==5058== by 0x400BD4: main (pixbuf-read.c:75) ==5058== Address 0x6f3cbd0 is 0 bytes after a block of size 144 alloc'd ==5058== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==5058== by 0x4E4104A: gdk_pixbuf_new (gdk-pixbuf.c:464) ==5058== by 0x72F6B93: gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment (io-jpeg.c:1093) ==5058== by 0x4E4B44C: gdk_pixbuf_loader_load_module (gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:443) ==5058== by 0x4E4BE23: gdk_pixbuf_loader_close (gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:811) ==5058== by 0x400AA0: test_loader (pixbuf-read.c:35) ==5058== by 0x400BD4: main (pixbuf-read.c:75) ==5058== ``` So, generally there is a buffer allocated inside `gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment` and later overflowed in `null_convert`. Let's take a closer look at where this allocation takes place: ``` Line 1093 context->pixbuf = gdk_pixbuf_new (GDK_COLORSPACE_RGB, Line 1094 cinfo->output_components == 4 ? TRUE : FALSE, Line 1095 8, Line 1096 cinfo->output_width, Line 1097 cinfo->output_height); ``` The important variable here is `cinfo->output_components`. Its value is equal to `0x9` so as a result of the comparison, second argument passed to `gdk_pixbuf_new` will be a `False` boolean flag. Going inside this function we see: ``` Line 440 gdk_pixbuf_new (GdkColorspace colorspace, Line 441 gboolean has_alpha, Line 442 int bits_per_sample, Line 443 int width, Line 444 int height) Line 445 { Line 446 guchar *buf; Line 447 unsigned int channels; Line 448 unsigned int rowstride; (...) Line 455 channels = has_alpha ? 4 : 3; Line 456 Line 457 /* Overflow? */ Line 458 if (width > (G_MAXUINT - 3) / channels) Line 459 return NULL; Line 460 Line 461 /* Always align rows to 32-bit boundaries */ Line 462 rowstride = (width * channels + 3) & ~3; Line 463 Line 464 buf = g_try_malloc_n (height, rowstride); ``` We see that the `channels` variable which is used in the calculation of the `rowstride` value at `line 462`. The size of the allocated buffer in our case equals 0x90. Now going straight to the function where the heap overflow appears we see these lines: ``` jdcolor.c libjpeg-turbo -------------------------------- Line 363 METHODDEF(void) Line 364 null_convert (j_decompress_ptr cinfo, Line 365 JSAMPIMAGE input_buf, JDIMENSION input_row, Line 366 JSAMPARRAY output_buf, int num_rows) (...) Line 370 register int num_components = cinfo->num_components; (...) Line 374 if (num_components == 3) { (...) Line 387 } else if (num_components == 4) { (...) Line 402 } else { Line 403 while (--num_rows >= 0) { Line 404 for (ci = 0; ci < num_components; ci++) { Line 405 inptr = input_buf[ci][input_row]; Line 406 outptr = *output_buf; Line 407 for (col = 0; col < num_cols; col++) { Line 408 outptr[ci] = inptr[col]; Line 409 outptr += num_components; Line 410 } Line 411 } Line 412 output_buf++; Line 413 input_row++; Line 414 } ``` Based on the `num_components` value, a different loop is used to copy data from the input buffer to the output one. We land of course in if branch starting at Line 403 because our `num_components` equals 0x9. Then we see the following: Line 403: the `while` loop condition is based on `num_rows` which equals 0x1 Line 404: the `for` is controlled by `num_components` which equals 0x9 and finally Line 407: tihs for loop is controlled by `num_cols` which equals 0x2f. It is clear now why the overflow occurs. The Gdk-pixbuf developers assume only two scenarios of `number of components`: 3 or 4 and based on those two potential values, allocated the buffer. Here we land in scenario where `num_components` equals 0x9 that will cause an out of buffer write at `line 408` in will result in heap corruption. ### Crash Information ``` Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [----------------------------------registers-----------------------------------] RAX: 0x80 RBX: 0x7ffff4702000 --> 0x0 RCX: 0x7fffffffda40 --> 0x7ffff4701f70 --> 0xffffffffffffff80 RDX: 0x7ffff4702000 --> 0x0 RSI: 0x7ffff46fc758 --> 0x7ffff46fc840 --> 0x7ffff47b4f80 --> 0x8080808080808080 RDI: 0x7ffff4d70c10 --> 0x7ffff4d70e88 --> 0x7ffff4a7cbb0 (: push rbp) RBP: 0x7fffffffd910 --> 0x7fffffffd970 --> 0x7fffffffd9c0 --> 0x7fffffffda00 --> 0x7fffffffda80 (0x00007fffffffdb60) RSP: 0x7fffffffd8e8 --> 0x0 RIP: 0x7ffff48128c7 (mov BYTE PTR [rdx],al) R8 : 0x1 R9 : 0x0 R10: 0x5b ('[') R11: 0x7ffff483d24c (: push rbp) R12: 0x10 R13: 0x9 ('\t') R14: 0x7ffff47b4f80 --> 0x8080808080808080 R15: 0x0 EFLAGS: 0x10206 (carry PARITY adjust zero sign trap INTERRUPT direction overflow) [-------------------------------------code-------------------------------------] 0x7ffff48128be: mov eax,r12d 0x7ffff48128c1: add rax,r14 0x7ffff48128c4: movzx eax,BYTE PTR [rax] => 0x7ffff48128c7: mov BYTE PTR [rdx],al 0x7ffff48128c9: movsxd rax,r13d 0x7ffff48128cc: add rbx,rax 0x7ffff48128cf: add r12d,0x1 0x7ffff48128d3: cmp r12d,DWORD PTR [rbp-0x2c] [------------------------------------stack-------------------------------------] 0000| 0x7fffffffd8e8 --> 0x0 0008| 0x7fffffffd8f0 --> 0x400950 (: xor ebp,ebp) 0016| 0x7fffffffd8f8 --> 0x7fffffffdd70 --> 0x2 0024| 0x7fffffffd900 --> 0x0 0032| 0x7fffffffd908 --> 0x0 0040| 0x7fffffffd910 --> 0x7fffffffd970 --> 0x7fffffffd9c0 --> 0x7fffffffda00 --> 0x7fffffffda80 (0x00007fffffffdb60) 0048| 0x7fffffffd918 --> 0x7ffff482a507 (mov rax,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x50]) 0056| 0x7fffffffd920 --> 0x7fffffffd9f4 --> 0xe399da0000000000 [------------------------------------------------------------------------------] Legend: code, data, rodata, value Stopped reason: SIGSEGV 0x00007ffff48128c7 in null_convert (cinfo=0x7ffff4d70c10, input_buf=0x7ffff46fc758, input_row=0x0, output_buf=0x7fffffffda40, num_rows=0x0) at jdcolor.c:408 408 outptr[ci] = inptr[col]; gdb-peda$ bt #0 0x00007ffff48128c7 in null_convert (cinfo=0x7ffff4d70c10, input_buf=0x7ffff46fc758, input_row=0x0, output_buf=0x7fffffffda40, num_rows=0x0) at jdcolor.c:408 #1 0x00007ffff482a507 in sep_upsample (cinfo=0x7ffff4d70c10, input_buf=0x7ffff46fe3f0, in_row_group_ctr=0x7ffff46fe444, in_row_groups_avail=0x8, output_buf=0x7fffffffda40, out_row_ctr=0x7fffffffd9f4, out_rows_avail=0x1) at jdsample.c:98 #2 0x00007ffff481b661 in process_data_simple_main (cinfo=0x7ffff4d70c10, output_buf=0x7fffffffda40, out_row_ctr=0x7fffffffd9f4, out_rows_avail=0x1) at jdmainct.c:311 #3 0x00007ffff480e4a6 in jpeg_read_scanlines (cinfo=0x7ffff4d70c10, scanlines=0x7fffffffda40, max_lines=0x1) at jdapistd.c: 282 #4 0x00007ffff4a7e4ab in gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_lines (context=0x7ffff4d70bd0, error=0x7fffffffdbd8) at io-jpeg.c:901 #5 0x00007ffff4a7efb3 in gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment (data=0x7ffff4d70bd0, buf=0x7ffff5273fd4 "\377\330\377", , size=0x34a, error=0x7fffffffdbd8) at io-jpeg.c:1201 #6 0x00007ffff79ad44d in gdk_pixbuf_loader_load_module (loader=0x7ffff546be00, image_type=0x0, error=0x7fffffffdbd8) at gdk- pixbuf-loader.c:443 #7 0x00007ffff79ade24 in gdk_pixbuf_loader_close (loader=0x7ffff546be00, error=0x7fffffffdc80) at gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:811 #8 0x0000000000400aa1 in test_loader (bytes=0x7ffff53e9cb5 "\377\330\377", , len=0x34a, err=0x7fffffffdc80) at pixbuf- read.c:35 #9 0x0000000000400bd5 in main (argc=0x2, argv=0x7fffffffdd78) at pixbuf-read.c:75 #10 0x00007ffff70c5830 in __libc_start_main (main=0x400ad8 , argc=0x2, argv=0x7fffffffdd78, init=, fini=, rtld_fini=, stack_end=0x7fffffffdd68) at ../csu/libc-start.c:291 #11 0x0000000000400979 in _start () gdb-peda$ ``` ### Timeline * 2017-07-11 - Vendor Disclosure * 2017-08-30 - Public Release ### CREDIT * Discovered by Marcin 'Icewall' Noga of Cisco Talos. |
id | SSV:96447 |
last seen | 2017-11-19 |
modified | 2017-09-12 |
published | 2017-09-12 |
reporter | Root |
title | Gdk-Pixbuf JPEG gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment Code Execution Vulnerability(CVE-2017-2862) |
Talos
id | TALOS-2017-0366 |
last seen | 2019-05-29 |
published | 2017-08-30 |
reporter | Talos Intelligence |
source | http://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2017-0366 |
title | Gdk-Pixbuf JPEG gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment Code Execution Vulnerability |