Vulnerabilities > CVE-2017-12276 - SQL Injection vulnerability in Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning

047910
CVSS 8.1 - HIGH
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
LOW
Confidentiality impact
HIGH
Integrity impact
HIGH
Availability impact
NONE
network
low complexity
cisco
CWE-89
nessus

Summary

A vulnerability in the web framework code for the SQL database interface of the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning application could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to impact the confidentiality and integrity of the application by executing arbitrary SQL queries, aka SQL Injection. The attacker could read or write information from the SQL database. The vulnerability is due to a lack of proper validation on user-supplied input within SQL queries. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted URLs that contain malicious SQL statements to the affected application. An exploit could allow the attacker to determine the presence of certain values and write malicious input in the SQL database. The attacker would need to have valid user credentials. This vulnerability affects Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Software Releases prior to 12.3. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf47935.

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Object Relational Mapping Injection
    An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject his or her own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
  • SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering
    An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
  • Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database
    An attacker is able to leverage access gained to the database to read / write data to the file system, compromise the operating system, create a tunnel for accessing the host machine, and use this access to potentially attack other machines on the same network as the database machine. Traditionally SQL injections attacks are viewed as a way to gain unauthorized read access to the data stored in the database, modify the data in the database, delete the data, etc. However, almost every data base management system (DBMS) system includes facilities that if compromised allow an attacker complete access to the file system, operating system, and full access to the host running the database. The attacker can then use this privileged access to launch subsequent attacks. These facilities include dropping into a command shell, creating user defined functions that can call system level libraries present on the host machine, stored procedures, etc.
  • SQL Injection
    This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input. When specially crafted user-controlled input consisting of SQL syntax is used without proper validation as part of SQL queries, it is possible to glean information from the database in ways not envisaged during application design. Depending upon the database and the design of the application, it may also be possible to leverage injection to have the database execute system-related commands of the attackers' choice. SQL Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. In order to successfully inject SQL and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:

Nessus

NASL familyCISCO
NASL idCISCO_PRIME_CP_SA-20171101-CPCP.NASL
descriptionAccording to its self-reported version number, the remote Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning server is 9.x, 10.x, 11.x, or 12.x prior to 12.3. It is, therefore, affected by an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability. Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id104462
published2017-11-08
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2017-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/104462
titleCisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning < 12.3 Authenticated SQL Injection Vulnerability (cisco-sa-20171101-cpcp)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(104462);
  script_version("1.6");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/11/12");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2017-12276");
  script_bugtraq_id(101640);
  script_xref(name:"CISCO-BUG-ID", value:"CSCvf47935");
  script_xref(name:"CISCO-SA", value:"cisco-sa-20171101-cpcp");

  script_name(english:"Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning < 12.3 Authenticated SQL Injection Vulnerability (cisco-sa-20171101-cpcp)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning version.");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote network management server is affected by a SQL injection
vulnerability.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"According to its self-reported version number, the remote Cisco Prime
Collaboration Provisioning server is 9.x, 10.x, 11.x, or 12.x prior to
12.3. It is, therefore, affected by an authenticated SQL injection
vulnerability.

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead
relied only on the application's self-reported version number.");
  # https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20171101-cpcp
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?17d6b14c");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Upgrade to Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning version 12.3 or
later.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N");
  script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2017-12276");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2017/11/01");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2017/09/26");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2017/11/08");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"combined");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:cisco:prime_collaboration_provisioning");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:cisco:prime_collaboration");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"CISCO");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2017-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");

  script_dependencies("cisco_prime_collaboration_provisioning_detect.nbin");
  script_require_keys("Host/Cisco/PrimeCollaborationProvisioning/version");

  exit(0);
}

include("audit.inc");
include("global_settings.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");

appname = "Prime Collaboration Provisioning";
version = get_kb_item_or_exit("Host/Cisco/PrimeCollaborationProvisioning/version");

# We got the version from the WebUI and its not granular enough
if (version =~ "^(9|1[0-2])$")
  audit(AUDIT_VER_NOT_GRANULAR, appname, version);

fix = "12.3.0";

# 9.x - 12.x
if(version =~ "^(9|1[0-2])\." &&
  ver_compare(ver:version, fix:fix, strict:FALSE) < 0
)
{
  report =
    '\n  Installed version : ' + version +
    '\n  Fixed version     : ' + fix +
    '\n';
  security_report_v4(port:0, extra:report, severity:SECURITY_WARNING, sqli:TRUE);
}
else audit(AUDIT_INST_VER_NOT_VULN, appname, version);