Vulnerabilities > CVE-2017-11761 - Information Exposure vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013/2016
Attack vector
NETWORK Attack complexity
LOW Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
LOW Integrity impact
NONE Availability impact
NONE Summary
Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 allow an input sanitization issue with Microsoft Exchange that could potentially result in unintended Information Disclosure, aka "Microsoft Exchange Information Disclosure Vulnerability"
Vulnerable Configurations
Part | Description | Count |
---|---|---|
Application | 5 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Subverting Environment Variable Values The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
- Footprinting An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
- Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible) An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
- Browser Fingerprinting An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
- Session Credential Falsification through Prediction This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
Nessus
NASL family | Windows : Microsoft Bulletins |
NASL id | SMB_NT_MS17_SEP_EXCHANGE.NASL |
description | The Microsoft Exchange Server installed on the remote host is missing security updates. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft Exchange Outlook Web Access (OWA) fails to properly handle web requests. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could perform script/content injection attacks and attempt to trick the user into disclosing sensitive information. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could send a specially crafted email message containing a malicious link to a user. Alternatively, an attacker could use a chat client to social engineer a user into clicking the malicious link. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Exchange validates web requests. Note: In order to exploit this vulnerability, a user must click a maliciously crafted link from an attacker. (CVE-2017-8758) - An input sanitization issue exists with Microsoft Exchange that could potentially result in unintended Information Disclosure. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could identify the existence of RFC1918 addresses on the local network from a client on the Internet. An attacker could use this internal host information as part of a larger attack. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could include specially crafted tags in Calendar-related messages sent to an Exchange server. These specially-tagged messages could prompt the Exchange server to fetch information from internal servers. By observing telemetry from these requests, a client could discern properties of internal hosts intended to be hidden from the Internet. The update corrects the way that Exchange parses Calendar- related messages. (CVE-2017-11761) |
last seen | 2020-06-01 |
modified | 2020-06-02 |
plugin id | 103139 |
published | 2017-09-12 |
reporter | This script is Copyright (C) 2017-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc. |
source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/103139 |
title | Security Updates for Exchange (September 2017) |
References
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100731
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100731
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039320
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039320
- https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-11761
- https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-11761