Vulnerabilities > CVE-2016-1320 - OS Command Injection vulnerability in Cisco Prime Collaboration 11.0.0/9.0.0/9.0.5

047910
CVSS 6.7 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
LOCAL
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
HIGH
Confidentiality impact
HIGH
Integrity impact
HIGH
Availability impact
HIGH
local
low complexity
cisco
CWE-78
nessus

Summary

The CLI in Cisco Prime Collaboration 9.0 and 11.0 allows local users to execute arbitrary OS commands as root by leveraging administrator privileges, aka Bug ID CSCux69286.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Cisco
3

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Command Delimiters
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or a blacklist input validation, as opposed to whitelist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or blacklist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
    An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
  • Argument Injection
    An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
  • OS Command Injection
    In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.

Nessus

NASL familyCISCO
NASL idCISCO_PRIME_CP_SA-20160209-PCP.NASL
descriptionAccording to its self-reported version number, the remote Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning server is 9.0.x or 11.0.x prior to 11.1. It is, therefore, affected by a local privilege escalation vulnerability in its command line interface due to improper sanitization of user-supplied input. A local attacker with administrator-level access can exploit this to gain root access to the host operating system.
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id93400
published2016-09-09
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2016-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/93400
titleCisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning 9.0.x / 11.0.x < 11.1 Local Privilege Escalation (cisco-sa-20160209-pcp)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(93400);
  script_version("1.6");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2019/11/14");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2016-1320");
  script_bugtraq_id(83137);
  script_xref(name:"CISCO-BUG-ID", value:"CSCux69286");
  script_xref(name:"CISCO-SA", value:"cisco-sa-20160209-pcp");

  script_name(english:"Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning 9.0.x / 11.0.x < 11.1 Local Privilege Escalation (cisco-sa-20160209-pcp)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning version.");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote network management server is affected by a privilege
escalation vulnerability.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"According to its self-reported version number, the remote Cisco Prime
Collaboration Provisioning server is 9.0.x or 11.0.x prior to 11.1. It
is, therefore, affected by a local privilege escalation vulnerability
in its command line interface due to improper sanitization of
user-supplied input. A local attacker with administrator-level access
can exploit this to gain root access to the host operating system.");
  # https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160209-pcp
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?d1574c1f");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Upgrade to Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning version 11.1.0 or
later.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H");
  script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2016-1320");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2016/02/09");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2016/02/09");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2016/09/09");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"combined");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:cisco:prime_collaboration_provisioning");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:cisco:prime_collaboration");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"CISCO");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2016-2019 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");

  script_dependencies("cisco_prime_collaboration_provisioning_detect.nbin");
  script_require_keys("Host/Cisco/PrimeCollaborationProvisioning/version");

  exit(0);
}

include("audit.inc");
include("global_settings.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");

appname = "Prime Collaboration Provisioning";
version = get_kb_item_or_exit("Host/Cisco/PrimeCollaborationProvisioning/version");

# We got the version from the WebUI and its not granular enough
if (version == "9" || version == "11")
  audit(AUDIT_VER_NOT_GRANULAR, appname, version);

fix = "11.1.0";

if(
  version =~ "^(9\.0|11\.0)([^0-9]|$)" &&
  ver_compare(ver:version, fix:fix, strict:FALSE) < 0
)
{
  report =
    '\n  Installed version : ' + version +
    '\n  Fixed version     : ' + fix +
    '\n';
  security_report_v4(port:0, extra:report, severity:SECURITY_WARNING);
}
else audit(AUDIT_INST_VER_NOT_VULN, appname, version);