Vulnerabilities > CVE-2015-2544 - Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013

047910
CVSS 0.0 - NONE
Attack vector
UNKNOWN
Attack complexity
UNKNOWN
Privileges required
UNKNOWN
Confidentiality impact
UNKNOWN
Integrity impact
UNKNOWN
Availability impact
UNKNOWN

Summary

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Outlook Web Access (OWA) in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Cumulative Update 8 and 9 and SP1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted e-mail message, aka "Exchange Spoofing Vulnerability."

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Microsoft
3

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Embedding Scripts in Non-Script Elements
    This attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where malicious scripts are embedded in elements that are not expected to host scripts such as image tags (<img>), comments in XML documents (< !-CDATA->), etc. These tags may not be subject to the same input validation, output validation, and other content filtering and checking routines, so this can create an opportunity for an attacker to tunnel through the application's elements and launch a XSS attack through other elements. As with all remote attacks, it is important to differentiate the ability to launch an attack (such as probing an internal network for unpatched servers) and the ability of the remote attacker to collect and interpret the output of said attack.
  • Embedding Scripts within Scripts
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts. The attacker leverages this capability to execute scripts to execute his/her own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute. The attacker must have the ability to inject script into script that is likely to be executed. If this is done, then the attacker can potentially launch a variety of probes and attacks against the web server's local environment, in many cases the so-called DMZ, back end resources the web server can communicate with, and other hosts. With the proliferation of intermediaries, such as Web App Firewalls, network devices, and even printers having JVMs and Web servers, there are many locales where an attacker can inject malicious scripts. Since this attack pattern defines scripts within scripts, there are likely privileges to execute said attack on the host. Of course, these attacks are not solely limited to the server side, client side scripts like Ajax and client side JavaScript can contain malicious scripts as well. In general all that is required is for there to be sufficient privileges to execute a script, but not protected against writing.
  • Cross-Site Scripting in Error Pages
    An attacker distributes a link (or possibly some other query structure) with a request to a third party web server that is malformed and also contains a block of exploit code in order to have the exploit become live code in the resulting error page. When the third party web server receives the crafted request and notes the error it then creates an error message that echoes the malformed message, including the exploit. Doing this converts the exploit portion of the message into to valid language elements that are executed by the viewing browser. When a victim executes the query provided by the attacker the infected error message error message is returned including the exploit code which then runs in the victim's browser. XSS can result in execution of code as well as data leakage (e.g. session cookies can be sent to the attacker). This type of attack is especially dangerous since the exploit appears to come from the third party web server, who the victim may trust and hence be more vulnerable to deception.
  • Cross-Site Scripting Using Alternate Syntax
    The attacker uses alternate forms of keywords or commands that result in the same action as the primary form but which may not be caught by filters. For example, many keywords are processed in a case insensitive manner. If the site's web filtering algorithm does not convert all tags into a consistent case before the comparison with forbidden keywords it is possible to bypass filters (e.g., incomplete black lists) by using an alternate case structure. For example, the "script" tag using the alternate forms of "Script" or "ScRiPt" may bypass filters where "script" is the only form tested. Other variants using different syntax representations are also possible as well as using pollution meta-characters or entities that are eventually ignored by the rendering engine. The attack can result in the execution of otherwise prohibited functionality.

Msbulletin

bulletin_idMS15-103
bulletin_url
date2015-09-08T00:00:00
impactInformation Disclosure
knowledgebase_id3089250
knowledgebase_url
severityImportant
titleVulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange Server Could Allow Information Disclosure

Nessus

NASL familyWindows : Microsoft Bulletins
NASL idSMB_NT_MS15-103.NASL
descriptionThe remote Microsoft Exchange server is missing a security update. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - An information disclosure vulnerability exists Outlook Web Access (OWA) due to improper handling of web requests. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this, via a specially crafted web application request, to see the contents of a stacktrace. (CVE-2015-2505) - Multiple spoofing vulnerabilities exist in Outlook Web Access (OWA) due to improper sanitization of specially crafted email. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit these vulnerabilities by convincing a user to visit a malicious website, resulting in the disclosure of sensitive information. (CVE-2015-2543, CVE-2015-2544)
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id85883
published2015-09-10
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2015-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/85883
titleMS15-103: Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange Server Could Allow Information Disclosure (3089250)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(85883);
  script_version("1.10");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2018/11/15 20:50:31");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2015-2505", "CVE-2015-2543", "CVE-2015-2544");
  script_bugtraq_id(76595, 76596, 76598);
  script_xref(name:"MSFT", value:"MS15-103");
  script_xref(name:"MSKB", value:"3087126");

  script_name(english:"MS15-103: Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange Server Could Allow Information Disclosure (3089250)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks the version of ExSetup.exe.");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote Microsoft Exchange server is affected by multiple
information disclosure vulnerabilities.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The remote Microsoft Exchange server is missing a security update. It
is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :

  - An information disclosure vulnerability exists Outlook
    Web Access (OWA) due to improper handling of web
    requests. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can
    exploit this, via a specially crafted web application
    request, to see the contents of a stacktrace.
    (CVE-2015-2505)

  - Multiple spoofing vulnerabilities exist in Outlook Web
    Access (OWA) due to improper sanitization of specially
    crafted email. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can
    exploit these vulnerabilities by convincing a user to
    visit a malicious website, resulting in the disclosure
    of sensitive information. (CVE-2015-2543, CVE-2015-2544)");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/SecurityBulletins/2015/ms15-103");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Microsoft has released a set of patches for Exchange 2013.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date",value:"2015/09/08");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date",value:"2015/09/08");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2015/09/10");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type",value:"local");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe",value:"cpe:/a:microsoft:exchange_server");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2015-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.");

  script_dependencies("ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl", "microsoft_exchange_installed.nbin");
  script_require_keys("SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible");
  script_require_ports(139, 445, "Host/patch_management_checks");

  exit(0);
}

include("audit.inc");
include("smb_func.inc");
include("smb_hotfixes.inc");
include("smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");
include("install_func.inc");

get_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');

bulletin = 'MS15-103';
kb = '3087126';
kbs = make_list(kb);

if (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_WARNING);

install = get_single_install(app_name:"Microsoft Exchange");

path = install["path"];
version = install["version"];
release = install["RELEASE"];
if (release != 150)
  audit(AUDIT_INST_VER_NOT_VULN, 'Exchange', version);
cu = install["CU"];

# Cumulative update 4 is Service Pack 1
if (isnull(cu) || (cu != 4 && cu != 8 && cu != 9))
  audit(AUDIT_INST_VER_NOT_VULN, 'Exchange', version);

if (cu == 4) # 2013 SP1 AKA CU4
{
  fixedver = "15.0.847.43";
}
else if (cu == 8) # 2013 CU8
{
  fixedver = '15.0.1076.14';
}
else if (cu == 9) # 2013 CU9
{
  fixedver = '15.0.1104.08';
}
if (hotfix_is_vulnerable(path:hotfix_append_path(path:path, value:"Bin"), file:"ExSetup.exe", version:fixedver, bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb))
{
  set_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/' + bulletin, value:TRUE);
  hotfix_security_warning();
  hotfix_check_fversion_end();
  exit(0);
}
else
{
  hotfix_check_fversion_end();
  audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, 'affected');
}