Vulnerabilities > CVE-2015-2365 - Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability in Microsoft products

047910
CVSS 7.2 - HIGH
Attack vector
LOCAL
Attack complexity
LOW
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
COMPLETE
Integrity impact
COMPLETE
Availability impact
COMPLETE
local
low complexity
microsoft
CWE-264
nessus
exploit available

Summary

win32k.sys in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2 and R2 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Accessing, Modifying or Executing Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an attacker to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an attacker to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
  • Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
    An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files, when the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high. The attack can be directed at a client system, such as causing buffer overrun through loading seemingly benign image files, as in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 where specially crafted JPEG files could cause a buffer overrun once loaded into the browser. Another example targets clients reading pdf files. In this case the attacker simply appends javascript to the end of a legitimate url for a pdf (http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/danger-danger-danger/) http://path/to/pdf/file.pdf#whatever_name_you_want=javascript:your_code_here The client assumes that they are reading a pdf, but the attacker has modified the resource and loaded executable javascript into the client's browser process. The attack can also target server processes. The attacker edits the resource or configuration file, for example a web.xml file used to configure security permissions for a J2EE app server, adding role name "public" grants all users with the public role the ability to use the administration functionality. The server trusts its configuration file to be correct, but when they are manipulated, the attacker gains full control.
  • Blue Boxing
    This type of attack against older telephone switches and trunks has been around for decades. A tone is sent by an adversary to impersonate a supervisor signal which has the effect of rerouting or usurping command of the line. While the US infrastructure proper may not contain widespread vulnerabilities to this type of attack, many companies are connected globally through call centers and business process outsourcing. These international systems may be operated in countries which have not upgraded Telco infrastructure and so are vulnerable to Blue boxing. Blue boxing is a result of failure on the part of the system to enforce strong authorization for administrative functions. While the infrastructure is different than standard current applications like web applications, there are historical lessons to be learned to upgrade the access control for administrative functions.
  • Restful Privilege Elevation
    Rest uses standard HTTP (Get, Put, Delete) style permissions methods, but these are not necessarily correlated generally with back end programs. Strict interpretation of HTTP get methods means that these HTTP Get services should not be used to delete information on the server, but there is no access control mechanism to back up this logic. This means that unless the services are properly ACL'd and the application's service implementation are following these guidelines then an HTTP request can easily execute a delete or update on the server side. The attacker identifies a HTTP Get URL such as http://victimsite/updateOrder, which calls out to a program to update orders on a database or other resource. The URL is not idempotent so the request can be submitted multiple times by the attacker, additionally, the attacker may be able to exploit the URL published as a Get method that actually performs updates (instead of merely retrieving data). This may result in malicious or inadvertent altering of data on the server.
  • Target Programs with Elevated Privileges
    This attack targets programs running with elevated privileges. The attacker would try to leverage a bug in the running program and get arbitrary code to execute with elevated privileges. For instance an attacker would look for programs that write to the system directories or registry keys (such as HKLM, which stores a number of critical Windows environment variables). These programs are typically running with elevated privileges and have usually not been designed with security in mind. Such programs are excellent exploit targets because they yield lots of power when they break. The malicious user try to execute its code at the same level as a privileged system call.

Exploit-Db

descriptionWindows Kernel - UserCommitDesktopMemory Use-After-Free (MS15-073). CVE-2015-2365. Dos exploit for win32 platform
fileexploits/windows_x86/dos/38267.txt
idEDB-ID:38267
last seen2016-02-04
modified2015-09-22
platformwindows_x86
port
published2015-09-22
reporterNils Sommer
sourcehttps://www.exploit-db.com/download/38267/
titleWindows Kernel - UserCommitDesktopMemory Use-After-Free MS15-073
typedos

Msbulletin

bulletin_idMS15-073
bulletin_url
date2015-07-14T00:00:00
impactElevation of Privilege
knowledgebase_id3070102
knowledgebase_url
severityImportant
titleVulnerabilities in Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Could Allow Elevation of Privilege

Nessus

NASL familyWindows : Microsoft Bulletins
NASL idSMB_NT_MS15-073.NASL
descriptionThe remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - Multiple privilege escalation vulnerabilities exist in the Windows kernel-mode driver due to improper handling of objects in memory. A local attacker can exploit these vulnerabilities, with a specially crafted application, to elevate privileges to full administrative rights. (CVE-2015-2363, CVE-2015-2365, CVE-2015-2366) - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel-mode driver due to improper handling of non-initialized values in memory. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability, with a specially crafted application, to leak memory addresses or other sensitive kernel information that can be used for further exploitation of the system. (CVE-2015-2367) - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Windows kernel-mode driver due to improper handling of private address information during a function call. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability, with a specially crafted application, to request the contents of specific memory addresses. (CVE-2015-2381, CVE-2015-2382)
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id84747
published2015-07-14
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2015-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/84747
titleMS15-073: Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (3070102)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(84747);
  script_version("1.6");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2018/11/15 20:50:31");

  script_cve_id(
    "CVE-2015-2363",
    "CVE-2015-2365",
    "CVE-2015-2366",
    "CVE-2015-2367",
    "CVE-2015-2381",
    "CVE-2015-2382"
  );
  #script_bugtraq_id();
  script_xref(name:"MSFT", value:"MS15-073");
  script_xref(name:"MSKB", value:"3070102");
  script_xref(name:"IAVA", value:"2015-A-0162");

  script_name(english:"MS15-073: Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (3070102)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks the file version of Win32k.sys.");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities :

  - Multiple privilege escalation vulnerabilities exist in
    the Windows kernel-mode driver due to improper handling
    of objects in memory. A local attacker can exploit these
    vulnerabilities, with a specially crafted application,
    to elevate privileges to full administrative rights.
    (CVE-2015-2363, CVE-2015-2365, CVE-2015-2366)

  - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the
    Windows kernel-mode driver due to improper handling of
    non-initialized values in memory. An attacker can
    exploit this vulnerability, with a specially crafted
    application, to leak memory addresses or other sensitive
    kernel information that can be used for further
    exploitation of the system. (CVE-2015-2367)

  - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the
    Windows kernel-mode driver due to improper handling of
    private address information during a function call. An
    attacker can exploit this vulnerability, with a
    specially crafted application, to request the contents
    of specific memory addresses. (CVE-2015-2381,
    CVE-2015-2382)");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/SecurityBulletins/2015/ms15-073");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Microsoft has released a set of patches for Windows 2003, Vista, 2008,
7, 2008 R2, 8, RT, 2012, 8.1, RT 8.1, and 2012 R2.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"Exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"true");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2015/07/14");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2015/07/14");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2015/07/14");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"stig_severity", value:"II");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2015-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.");

  script_dependencies("smb_hotfixes.nasl", "ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl");
  script_require_keys("SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible");
  script_require_ports(139, 445, "Host/patch_management_checks");

  exit(0);
}

include("audit.inc");
include("smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc");
include("smb_hotfixes.inc");
include("smb_func.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");

get_kb_item_or_exit("SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible");

bulletin = 'MS15-073';
kb = '3070102';

kbs = make_list(kb);
if (get_kb_item("Host/patch_management_checks")) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);

get_kb_item_or_exit("SMB/Registry/Enumerated");
get_kb_item_or_exit("SMB/WindowsVersion", exit_code:1);

if (hotfix_check_sp_range(win2003:'2', vista:'2', win7:'1', win8:'0', win81:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);

productname = get_kb_item_or_exit("SMB/ProductName", exit_code:1);
# Some of the 2k3 checks could flag XP 64, which is unsupported
if ("Windows XP" >< productname) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);

share = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);
if (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);

if (
  # Windows 8.1 / Windows Server 2012 R2
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.3", sp:0, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"6.3.9600.17915", min_version:"6.3.9600.16000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||

  # Windows 8 / Windows Server 2012
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.2", sp:0, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"6.2.9200.21528", min_version:"6.2.9200.20000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.2", sp:0, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"6.2.9200.17419", min_version:"6.2.9200.16000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||

  # Windows 7 / Server 2008 R2
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.1", sp:1, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"6.1.7601.23109", min_version:"6.1.7601.22000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.1", sp:1, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"6.1.7601.18906", min_version:"6.1.7600.16000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||

  # Vista / Windows Server 2008
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.0", sp:2, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"6.0.6002.23735", min_version:"6.0.6002.23000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"6.0", sp:2, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"6.0.6002.19429", min_version:"6.0.6001.18000", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb) ||

  # Windows Server 2003
  hotfix_is_vulnerable(os:"5.2", sp:2, file:"Win32k.sys", version:"5.2.3790.5667", dir:"\system32", bulletin:bulletin, kb:kb)
)
{
  set_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);
  hotfix_security_hole();
  hotfix_check_fversion_end();
  exit(0);
}
else
{
  hotfix_check_fversion_end();
  audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, 'affected');
}