Vulnerabilities > CVE-2013-5326 - Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Adobe Coldfusion

047910
CVSS 0.0 - NONE
Attack vector
UNKNOWN
Attack complexity
UNKNOWN
Privileges required
UNKNOWN
Confidentiality impact
UNKNOWN
Integrity impact
UNKNOWN
Availability impact
UNKNOWN

Summary

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 9.0 before Update 12, 9.0.1 before Update 11, 9.0.2 before Update 6, and 10 before Update 12, when the CFIDE directory is available, allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors related to the logviewer directory.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Adobe
10

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Embedding Scripts in Non-Script Elements
    This attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where malicious scripts are embedded in elements that are not expected to host scripts such as image tags (<img>), comments in XML documents (< !-CDATA->), etc. These tags may not be subject to the same input validation, output validation, and other content filtering and checking routines, so this can create an opportunity for an attacker to tunnel through the application's elements and launch a XSS attack through other elements. As with all remote attacks, it is important to differentiate the ability to launch an attack (such as probing an internal network for unpatched servers) and the ability of the remote attacker to collect and interpret the output of said attack.
  • Embedding Scripts within Scripts
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts. The attacker leverages this capability to execute scripts to execute his/her own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute. The attacker must have the ability to inject script into script that is likely to be executed. If this is done, then the attacker can potentially launch a variety of probes and attacks against the web server's local environment, in many cases the so-called DMZ, back end resources the web server can communicate with, and other hosts. With the proliferation of intermediaries, such as Web App Firewalls, network devices, and even printers having JVMs and Web servers, there are many locales where an attacker can inject malicious scripts. Since this attack pattern defines scripts within scripts, there are likely privileges to execute said attack on the host. Of course, these attacks are not solely limited to the server side, client side scripts like Ajax and client side JavaScript can contain malicious scripts as well. In general all that is required is for there to be sufficient privileges to execute a script, but not protected against writing.
  • Cross-Site Scripting in Error Pages
    An attacker distributes a link (or possibly some other query structure) with a request to a third party web server that is malformed and also contains a block of exploit code in order to have the exploit become live code in the resulting error page. When the third party web server receives the crafted request and notes the error it then creates an error message that echoes the malformed message, including the exploit. Doing this converts the exploit portion of the message into to valid language elements that are executed by the viewing browser. When a victim executes the query provided by the attacker the infected error message error message is returned including the exploit code which then runs in the victim's browser. XSS can result in execution of code as well as data leakage (e.g. session cookies can be sent to the attacker). This type of attack is especially dangerous since the exploit appears to come from the third party web server, who the victim may trust and hence be more vulnerable to deception.
  • Cross-Site Scripting Using Alternate Syntax
    The attacker uses alternate forms of keywords or commands that result in the same action as the primary form but which may not be caught by filters. For example, many keywords are processed in a case insensitive manner. If the site's web filtering algorithm does not convert all tags into a consistent case before the comparison with forbidden keywords it is possible to bypass filters (e.g., incomplete black lists) by using an alternate case structure. For example, the "script" tag using the alternate forms of "Script" or "ScRiPt" may bypass filters where "script" is the only form tested. Other variants using different syntax representations are also possible as well as using pollution meta-characters or entities that are eventually ignored by the rendering engine. The attack can result in the execution of otherwise prohibited functionality.

Nessus

NASL familyWindows
NASL idCOLDFUSION_WIN_APSB13-27.NASL
descriptionThe remote Windows host is running a version of ColdFusion that is affected by the following vulnerabilities : - A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability exists because ColdFusion does not sanitize user-supplied input. This can be exploited by a remote, authenticated user when the CFIDE directory is exposed. (CVE-2013-5326) - ColdFusion 10 is affected by an unspecified vulnerability that allows unauthorized remote read access. (CVE-2013-5328)
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id70915
published2013-11-14
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2013-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/70915
titleAdobe ColdFusion Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB13-27) (credentialed check)
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(70915);
  script_version("1.12");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2018/11/15 20:50:26");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2013-5326", "CVE-2013-5328");
  script_bugtraq_id(63681, 63682);
  script_xref(name:"TRA", value:"TRA-2013-08");
  script_xref(name:"CERT", value:"295276");

  script_name(english:"Adobe ColdFusion Multiple Vulnerabilities (APSB13-27) (credentialed check)");
  script_summary(english:"Checks hotfix files");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"A web-based application running on the remote Windows host is affected
by multiple vulnerabilities.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The remote Windows host is running a version of ColdFusion that is
affected by the following vulnerabilities :

  - A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability exists
    because ColdFusion does not sanitize user-supplied
    input. This can be exploited by a remote, authenticated
    user when the CFIDE directory is exposed.
    (CVE-2013-5326)

  - ColdFusion 10 is affected by an unspecified
    vulnerability that allows unauthorized remote read
    access. (CVE-2013-5328)");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2013-08");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb13-27.html");
  # https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/kb/coldfusion-security-hotfix-apsb13-27.html
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?60c7aed1");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:"Apply the relevant hotfixes referenced in Adobe advisory APSB13-27.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");
  script_cwe_id(20, 74, 79, 442, 629, 711, 712, 722, 725, 750, 751, 800, 801, 809, 811, 864, 900, 928, 931, 990);

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2013/11/12");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2013/11/12");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2013/11/14");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:adobe:coldfusion");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"Windows");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2013-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc.");

  script_dependencies("coldfusion_win_local_detect.nasl");
  script_require_keys("SMB/coldfusion/instance");
  script_require_ports(139, 445);

  exit(0);
}

include("audit.inc");
include("coldfusion_win.inc");
include("global_settings.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");
include("smb_func.inc");

versions = make_list('9.0.0', '9.0.1', '9.0.2', '10.0.0');
instances = get_coldfusion_instances(versions); # this exits if it fails

# Check the hotfixes and cumulative hotfixes installed for each
# instance of ColdFusion.
info = NULL;
instance_info = make_list();

# a connection needs to be made to the system in order to call check_cfide_hotfix()
port   = kb_smb_transport();
login  = kb_smb_login();
pass   = kb_smb_password();
domain = kb_smb_domain();

if(! smb_session_init()) audit(AUDIT_FN_FAIL, 'smb_session_init');

cfide_file = "\CFIDE\administrator\logviewer\_searchloglogic_other.cfm";
searchterm = 'doFinally';

foreach name (keys(instances))
{
  info = NULL;
  ver = instances[name];

  if (ver == "9.0.0")
  {
    info = check_cfide_hotfix(name, cfide_file, searchterm, 'CFIDE-9.zip');
    remove = make_list("00001", "00002", "00003", "00004", "00005", "00006", "00007", "00008", "00009", "00010", "00011");
    info += check_jar_hotfix(name, "00012", 2, remove);
  }
  else if (ver == "9.0.1")
  {
    info = check_cfide_hotfix(name, cfide_file, searchterm, 'CFIDE-901.zip');
    remove = make_list("00001", "00002", "00003", "00004", "00005", "00006", "00007", "00008", "00009", "00010");
    info += check_jar_hotfix(name, "00011", 3, remove);
  }
  else if (ver == "9.0.2")
  {
    info = check_cfide_hotfix(name, cfide_file, searchterm, 'CFIDE-902.zip');
    remove = make_list("00001", "00002", "00003", "00004", "00005");
    info += check_jar_hotfix(name, "00006", 1, remove);
  }
  else if (ver == "10.0.0")
  {
    # CF10 uses an installer for updates so it is less likely (perhaps not possible) to only partially install a hotfix.
    # this means the plugin doesn't need to check for anything in the CFIDE directory, it just needs to check the CHF level
    info = check_jar_chf(name, 12);
  }

  if (!isnull(info))
    instance_info = make_list(instance_info, info);
}

NetUseDel();

if (max_index(instance_info) == 0) exit(0, "No vulnerable instances of Adobe ColdFusion were detected.");

set_kb_item(name:'www/0/XSS', value:TRUE);

if (report_verbosity > 0)
{
  report =
    '\nNessus detected the following unpatched instances :' +
    '\n' + join(instance_info, sep:'\n') +
    '\n';
  security_hole(port:port, extra:report);
}
else security_hole(port);

The Hacker News

idTHN:94E632EBA2F2F8E0EE29D17E71E3261A
last seen2017-01-08
modified2013-11-13
published2013-11-13
reporterMohit Kumar
sourcehttp://thehackernews.com/2013/11/Adobe-Flash-ColdFusion-vulnerabilities-exploit-Hacker-News.html
titleSecurity updates for available for Adobe Flash Player and ColdFusion vulnerabilities