Vulnerabilities > CVE-2013-2167 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in multiple products
Attack vector
NETWORK Attack complexity
LOW Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
HIGH Integrity impact
HIGH Availability impact
HIGH Summary
python-keystoneclient version 0.2.3 to 0.2.5 has middleware memcache signing bypass
Vulnerable Configurations
| Part | Description | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Application | 3 | |
| Application | 1 | |
| OS | 3 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking) An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website. An attacker gets the victim to visit his or her malicious page that contains a script tag whose source points to the vulnerable system with a URL that requests a response from the server containing a JSON object with possibly confidential information. The malicious page also contains malicious code to capture the JSON object returned by the server before any other processing on it can take place, typically by overriding the JavaScript function used to create new objects. This hook allows the malicious code to get access to the creation of each object and transmit the possibly sensitive contents of the captured JSON object to the attackers' server. There is nothing in the browser's security model to prevent the attackers' malicious JavaScript code (originating from attacker's domain) to set up an environment (as described above) to intercept a JSON object response (coming from the vulnerable target system's domain), read its contents and transmit to the attackers' controlled site. The same origin policy protects the domain object model (DOM), but not the JSON.
- Cache Poisoning An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
- DNS Cache Poisoning A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An attacker modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the attacker specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Attackers can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
- Cross-Site Scripting Using MIME Type Mismatch An attacker creates a file with scripting content but where the specified MIME type of the file is such that scripting is not expected. Some browsers will detect that the specified MIME type of the file does not match the actual type of the content and will automatically switch to using an interpreter for the real content type. If the browser does not invoke script filters before doing this, the attackers' script may run on the target unsanitized. For example, the MIME type text/plain may be used where the actual content is text/javascript or text/html. Since text does not contain scripting instructions, the stated MIME type would indicate that filtering is unnecessary. However, if the target application subsequently determines the file's real type and invokes the appropriate interpreter, scripted content could be invoked. In another example, img tags in HTML content could reference a renderable type file instead of an expected image file. The file extension and MIME type can describe an image file, but the file content can be text/javascript or text/html resulting in script execution. If the browser assumes all references in img tags are images, and therefore do not need to be filtered for scripts, this would bypass content filters. In a cross-site scripting attack, the attacker tricks the victim into accessing a URL that uploads a script file with an incorrectly specified MIME type. If the victim's browser switches to the appropriate interpreter without filtering, the attack will execute as a standard XSS attack, possibly revealing the victim's cookies or executing arbitrary script in their browser.
- Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML Messages An attacker spoofs a UDDI, ebXML, or similar message in order to impersonate a service provider in an e-business transaction. UDDI, ebXML, and similar standards are used to identify businesses in e-business transactions. Among other things, they identify a particular participant, WSDL information for SOAP transactions, and supported communication protocols, including security protocols. By spoofing one of these messages an attacker could impersonate a legitimate business in a transaction or could manipulate the protocols used between a client and business. This could result in disclosure of sensitive information, loss of message integrity, or even financial fraud.
Nessus
| NASL family | Fedora Local Security Checks |
| NASL id | FEDORA_2013-14302.NASL |
| description | Selective backports from stable/grizzly : - Ec2Signer: Initial support for v4 signature verification. - Allow signature verification for older boto versions. - Default signing_dir to secure temp dir. - Fix memcache encryption middleware. (CVE-2013-2166, CVE-2013-2167) - Check token expiry. (CVE-2013-2104) - Allow secure user password update. (CVE-2013-2013) Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues. |
| last seen | 2020-03-17 |
| modified | 2013-08-15 |
| plugin id | 69361 |
| published | 2013-08-15 |
| reporter | This script is Copyright (C) 2013-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. |
| source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/69361 |
| title | Fedora 19 : python-keystoneclient-0.2.3-7.fc19 (2013-14302) |
| code | |
Redhat
| rpms |
|
Seebug
| bulletinFamily | exploit |
| description | Bugtraq ID:60680 CVE ID:CVE-2013-2167 OpenStack是由Rackspace和NASA共同开发的云计算平台，帮助服务商和企业内部实现类似于Amazon EC2和S3的云基础架构。 OpenStack python-keystoneclient客户端中间件memcache加密实现存在安全漏洞，允许可直接对memcache后端(或在中间人位置)进行写访问的攻击者注入恶意数据来绕过签名安全策略。 在Keystone中间件(指定memcache_servers)中使用memcache缓存和使用ENCRYPT或MAC作为它们的memcache_security_strategy的系统受此漏洞影响。 0 python-keystoneclient 0.2.3 - 0.2.5 厂商解决方案 用户可参考如下厂商提供的安全公告获得补丁信息： https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+bug/1175368 |
| id | SSV:60850 |
| last seen | 2017-11-19 |
| modified | 2013-06-25 |
| published | 2013-06-25 |
| reporter | Root |
| title | OpenStack python-keystoneclient 安全绕过漏洞(CVE-2013-2167) |
References
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-2167
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2013-2167
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-2167
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0992.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/60680
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85492
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-August/113944.html
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-2167
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/06/19/5