Vulnerabilities > CVE-2013-2166 - Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in multiple products
Attack vector
NETWORK Attack complexity
LOW Privileges required
NONE Confidentiality impact
HIGH Integrity impact
HIGH Availability impact
HIGH Summary
python-keystoneclient version 0.2.3 to 0.2.5 has middleware memcache encryption bypass
Vulnerable Configurations
Part | Description | Count |
---|---|---|
Application | 3 | |
Application | 1 | |
OS | 1 | |
OS | 3 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Brute Force In this attack, some asset (information, functionality, identity, etc.) is protected by a finite secret value. The attacker attempts to gain access to this asset by using trial-and-error to exhaustively explore all the possible secret values in the hope of finding the secret (or a value that is functionally equivalent) that will unlock the asset. Examples of secrets can include, but are not limited to, passwords, encryption keys, database lookup keys, and initial values to one-way functions. The key factor in this attack is the attackers' ability to explore the possible secret space rapidly. This, in turn, is a function of the size of the secret space and the computational power the attacker is able to bring to bear on the problem. If the attacker has modest resources and the secret space is large, the challenge facing the attacker is intractable. While the defender cannot control the resources available to an attacker, they can control the size of the secret space. Creating a large secret space involves selecting one's secret from as large a field of equally likely alternative secrets as possible and ensuring that an attacker is unable to reduce the size of this field using available clues or cryptanalysis. Doing this is more difficult than it sounds since elimination of patterns (which, in turn, would provide an attacker clues that would help them reduce the space of potential secrets) is difficult to do using deterministic machines, such as computers. Assuming a finite secret space, a brute force attack will eventually succeed. The defender must rely on making sure that the time and resources necessary to do so will exceed the value of the information. For example, a secret space that will likely take hundreds of years to explore is likely safe from raw-brute force attacks.
- Encryption Brute Forcing An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
Nessus
NASL family | Fedora Local Security Checks |
NASL id | FEDORA_2013-14302.NASL |
description | Selective backports from stable/grizzly : - Ec2Signer: Initial support for v4 signature verification. - Allow signature verification for older boto versions. - Default signing_dir to secure temp dir. - Fix memcache encryption middleware. (CVE-2013-2166, CVE-2013-2167) - Check token expiry. (CVE-2013-2104) - Allow secure user password update. (CVE-2013-2013) Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues. |
last seen | 2020-03-17 |
modified | 2013-08-15 |
plugin id | 69361 |
published | 2013-08-15 |
reporter | This script is Copyright (C) 2013-2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof. |
source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/69361 |
title | Fedora 19 : python-keystoneclient-0.2.3-7.fc19 (2013-14302) |
code |
|
Redhat
rpms |
|
References
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0992.html
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-2166
- https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-2166
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-2166
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2013-2166
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/60684
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-August/113944.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/06/19/5