Vulnerabilities > CVE-2010-10006 - Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerability in Jopenid Project Jopenid 1.01/1.05/1.07
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in michaelliao jopenid. Affected is the function getAuthentication of the file JOpenId/src/org/expressme/openid/OpenIdManager.java. The manipulation leads to observable timing discrepancy. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. Upgrading to version 1.08 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is c9baaa976b684637f0d5a50268e91846a7a719ab. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-218460.
Vulnerable Configurations
Part | Description | Count |
---|---|---|
Application | 4 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Fingerprinting An adversary compares output from a target system to known "fingerprints" that uniquely identify specific details about the target. Fingerprinting by itself is not usually detrimental to the target. However, the information gathered through fingerprinting often enables an adversary to discover existing weaknesses in the target.
- Cross-Domain Search Timing An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain. For GET requests an attacker could for instance leverage the "img" tag in conjunction with "onload() / onerror()" javascript events. For the POST requests, an attacker could leverage the "iframe" element and leverage the "onload()" event. There is nothing in the current browser security model that prevents an attacker to use these methods to time responses to the attackers' cross domain requests. The timing for these responses leaks information. For instance, if a victim has an active session with their online e-mail account, an attacker could issue search requests in the victim's mailbox. While the attacker is not able to view the responses, based on the timings of the responses, the attacker could ask yes / no questions as to the content of victim's e-mails, who the victim e-mailed, when, etc. This is but one example; There are other scenarios where an attacker could infer potentially sensitive information from cross domain requests by timing the responses while asking the right questions that leak information.