Vulnerabilities > CVE-2009-0141 - Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Apple mac OS X and mac OS X Server
Attack vector
LOCAL Attack complexity
LOW Privileges required
LOW Confidentiality impact
NONE Integrity impact
HIGH Availability impact
NONE Summary
XTerm in Apple Mac OS X 10.4.11 and 10.5.6, when used with luit, creates tty devices with insecure world-writable permissions, which allows local users to write to the Xterm of another user.
Vulnerable Configurations
| Part | Description | Count |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 4 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs In applications, particularly web applications, access to functionality is mitigated by the authorization framework, whose job it is to map ACLs to elements of the application's functionality; particularly URL's for web apps. In the case that the administrator failed to specify an ACL for a particular element, an attacker may be able to access it with impunity. An attacker with the ability to access functionality not properly constrained by ACLs can obtain sensitive information and possibly compromise the entire application. Such an attacker can access resources that must be available only to users at a higher privilege level, can access management sections of the application or can run queries for data that he is otherwise not supposed to.
- Privilege Abuse An adversary is able to exploit features of the target that should be reserved for privileged users or administrators but are exposed to use by lower or non-privileged accounts. Access to sensitive information and functionality must be controlled to ensure that only authorized users are able to access these resources. If access control mechanisms are absent or misconfigured, a user may be able to access resources that are intended only for higher level users. An adversary may be able to exploit this to utilize a less trusted account to gain information and perform activities reserved for more trusted accounts. This attack differs from privilege escalation and other privilege stealing attacks in that the adversary never actually escalates their privileges but instead is able to use a lesser degree of privilege to access resources that should be (but are not) reserved for higher privilege accounts. Likewise, the adversary does not exploit trust or subvert systems - all control functionality is working as configured but the configuration does not adequately protect sensitive resources at an appropriate level.
- Directory Indexing An adversary crafts a request to a target that results in the target listing/indexing the content of a directory as output. One common method of triggering directory contents as output is to construct a request containing a path that terminates in a directory name rather than a file name since many applications are configured to provide a list of the directory's contents when such a request is received. An adversary can use this to explore the directory tree on a target as well as learn the names of files. This can often end up revealing test files, backup files, temporary files, hidden files, configuration files, user accounts, script contents, as well as naming conventions, all of which can be used by an attacker to mount additional attacks.
- Accessing, Modifying or Executing Executable Files An attack of this type exploits a system's configuration that allows an attacker to either directly access an executable file, for example through shell access; or in a possible worst case allows an attacker to upload a file and then execute it. Web servers, ftp servers, and message oriented middleware systems which have many integration points are particularly vulnerable, because both the programmers and the administrators must be in synch regarding the interfaces and the correct privileges for each interface.
- Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels An attacker exploits a weakness in the configuration of access controls and is able to bypass the intended protection that these measures guard against and thereby obtain unauthorized access to the system or network. Sensitive functionality should always be protected with access controls. However configuring all but the most trivial access control systems can be very complicated and there are many opportunities for mistakes. If an attacker can learn of incorrectly configured access security settings, they may be able to exploit this in an attack. Most commonly, attackers would take advantage of controls that provided too little protection for sensitive activities in order to perform actions that should be denied to them. In some circumstances, an attacker may be able to take advantage of overly restrictive access control policies, initiating denial of services (if an application locks because it unexpectedly failed to be granted access) or causing other legitimate actions to fail due to security. The latter class of attacks, however, is usually less severe and easier to detect than attacks based on inadequate security restrictions. This attack pattern differs from CAPEC 1, "Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs" in that the latter describes attacks where sensitive functionality lacks access controls, where, in this pattern, the access control is present, but incorrectly configured.
Nessus
| NASL family | MacOS X Local Security Checks |
| NASL id | MACOSX_SECUPD2009-001.NASL |
| description | The remote host is running a version of Mac OS X 10.5 or 10.4 that does not have Security Update 2009-001 applied. This security update contains fixes for the following products : - AFP Server - Apple Pixlet Video - CarbonCore - CFNetwork - Certificate Assistant - ClamAV - CoreText - CUPS - DS Tools - fetchmail - Folder Manager - FSEvents - Network Time - perl - Printing - python - Remote Apple Events - Safari RSS - servermgrd - SMB - SquirrelMail - X11 - XTerm |
| last seen | 2020-06-01 |
| modified | 2020-06-02 |
| plugin id | 35684 |
| published | 2009-02-13 |
| reporter | This script is Copyright (C) 2009-2018 Tenable Network Security, Inc. |
| source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/35684 |
| title | Mac OS X Multiple Vulnerabilities (Security Update 2009-001) |
| code | |
Seebug
| bulletinFamily | exploit |
| description | BUGTRAQ ID: 33759 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2009-0009,CVE-2009-0020,CVE-2009-0142,CVE-2009-0011,CVE-2009-0012,CVE-2009-0013,CVE-2009-0014,CVE-2009-0015,CVE-2009-0017,CVE-2009-0018,CVE-2009-0019,CVE-2009-0137,CVE-2009-0138,CVE-2009-0139,CVE-2009-0140,CVE-2009-0141 Mac OS X是苹果家族机器所使用的操作系统。 Apple 2009-001安全更新修复了Mac OS X中的多个安全漏洞，本地或远程攻击者可能利用这些漏洞导致拒绝服务、读取敏感信息或执行任意代码。 CVE-2009-0009 使用Pixlet codec处理电影文件时存在内存破坏漏洞，打开特制的电影文件可能导致应用程序意外终止或执行任意代码。 CVE-2009-0020 资源管理器处理资源fork时存在内存破坏漏洞，打开带有特制资源fork的文件可能导致应用程序意外终止或执行任意代码。 CVE-2009-0142 AFP服务器中的竞争条件可能导致死循环，在AFP服务器上枚举文件可能触发拒绝服务。 CVE-2009-0011 证书助手处理临时文件的方式存在不安全的文件操作，可能允许本地用户以其他用户的权限覆盖文件。 CVE-2009-0012 在CoreText中处理Unicode字符串时存在堆溢出，使用CoreText处理特制的Unicode字符串（如查看特制的网页）可能导致应用程序意外终止或执行任意代码。 CVE-2009-0013 dscl命令行工具要求以参数的形式传送口令，这可能导致向其他本地用户暴露口令。 CVE-2009-0014 文件夹管理器中存在默认权限问题，当用户删除下载文件夹且文件夹管理器重新创建时，可能以任何用户都可读的权限创建文件夹。 CVE-2009-0015 fseventsd中存在凭据管理问题，本地用户可以使用FSEvents框架查看其他情况下不可看到的文件系统行为，包括目录名称和指定时间的删除行为。 CVE-2009-0017 csregprinter中的错误处理问题可能导致堆溢出，这允许本地用户获得系统权限。 CVE-2009-0018 Remote Apple Events服务器中的未初始化缓冲区问题可能导致向网络客户端泄露内存内容。 CVE-2009-0019 Remote Apple Events中存在越界内存访问，启用Remote Apple Events可能导致应用程序意外终止或向网络客户端泄露敏感信息。 CVE-2009-0137 Safari处理feed: URLs的方式存在多个输入验证错误，可能允许在本地安全区中执行任意JavaScript。 CVE-2009-0138 服务器管理器验证认证凭据方式的漏洞可能允许远程攻击者更改系统配置。 CVE-2009-0139 SMB文件系统中的整数溢出可能触发堆溢出，连接到恶意的SMB文件系统可能导致系统关闭或以系统权限执行任意代码。 CVE-2009-0140 SMB文件系统处理文件系统名称的方式存在内存耗尽问题，连接到恶意的SMB文件系统服务器可能导致系统意外关机。 CVE-2009-0141 Xterm中存在权限问题。在同luit使用时，Xterm会创建任何用户都可访问的tty设备。 Apple Mac OS X 10.5.6 Apple MacOS X Server 10.5.6 Apple Safari 3.2.2 for Windows 厂商补丁： Apple ----- 目前厂商已经发布了升级补丁以修复这个安全问题，请到厂商的主页下载： <a href=http://support.apple.com/downloads/Security_Update_2009_001__Tiger_Intel_ target=_blank rel=external nofollow>http://support.apple.com/downloads/Security_Update_2009_001__Tiger_Intel_</a> <a href=http://support.apple.com/downloads/Security_Update_2009_001__Tiger_PPC target=_blank rel=external nofollow>http://support.apple.com/downloads/Security_Update_2009_001__Tiger_PPC</a> _ |
| id | SSV:4762 |
| last seen | 2017-11-19 |
| modified | 2009-02-13 |
| published | 2009-02-13 |
| reporter | Root |
| title | Apple Mac OS X 2009-001更新修复多个安全漏洞 |
References
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/Feb/msg00000.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2009/Feb/msg00000.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33937
- http://secunia.com/advisories/33937
- http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2009/Feb/1021729.html
- http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2009/Feb/1021729.html
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3438
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3438
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33798
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33798
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0422
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0422
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/48727
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/48727