Vulnerabilities > CVE-2008-3588 - SQL Injection vulnerability in Phsblog 0.1.1
Attack vector
UNKNOWN Attack complexity
UNKNOWN Privileges required
UNKNOWN Confidentiality impact
UNKNOWN Integrity impact
UNKNOWN Availability impact
UNKNOWN Summary
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in phsBlog 0.1.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) eid parameter to comments.php, (2) cid parameter to index.php, and the (3) urltitle parameter to entries.php.
Vulnerable Configurations
Part | Description | Count |
---|---|---|
Application | 1 |
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL Injection An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
- Object Relational Mapping Injection An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject his or her own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
- Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database An attacker is able to leverage access gained to the database to read / write data to the file system, compromise the operating system, create a tunnel for accessing the host machine, and use this access to potentially attack other machines on the same network as the database machine. Traditionally SQL injections attacks are viewed as a way to gain unauthorized read access to the data stored in the database, modify the data in the database, delete the data, etc. However, almost every data base management system (DBMS) system includes facilities that if compromised allow an attacker complete access to the file system, operating system, and full access to the host running the database. The attacker can then use this privileged access to launch subsequent attacks. These facilities include dropping into a command shell, creating user defined functions that can call system level libraries present on the host machine, stored procedures, etc.
- SQL Injection This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input. When specially crafted user-controlled input consisting of SQL syntax is used without proper validation as part of SQL queries, it is possible to glean information from the database in ways not envisaged during application design. Depending upon the database and the design of the application, it may also be possible to leverage injection to have the database execute system-related commands of the attackers' choice. SQL Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. In order to successfully inject SQL and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
Exploit-Db
description | phsBlog 0.1.1 Multiple Remote SQL Injection Vulnerabilities. CVE-2008-3588. Webapps exploit for php platform |
file | exploits/php/webapps/6190.txt |
id | EDB-ID:6190 |
last seen | 2016-01-31 |
modified | 2008-08-01 |
platform | php |
port | |
published | 2008-08-01 |
reporter | cOndemned |
source | https://www.exploit-db.com/download/6190/ |
title | phsBlog 0.1.1 - Multiple Remote SQL Injection Vulnerabilities |
type | webapps |
Seebug
bulletinFamily | exploit |
description | BUGTRAQ ID: 31683 CVE(CAN) ID: CVE-2008-4008,CVE-2008-4009,CVE-2008-4010,CVE-2008-4011,CVE-2008-4012,CVE-2008-4013,CVE-2008-4000,CVE-2008-4001,CVE-2008-4002,CVE-2008-4003,CVE-2008-4004,CVE-2008-3985,CVE-2008-3988,CVE-2008-3998,CVE-2008-3619,CVE-2008-3993,CVE-2008-3975,CVE-2008-3977,CVE-2008-3588,CVE-2008-3986,CVE-2008-3987,CVE-2008-3989,CVE-2008-2624,CVE-2008-3996,CVE-2008-3992,CVE-2008-3976,CVE-2008-3982,CVE-2008-3983,CVE-2008-3984,CVE-2008-3994,CVE-2008-3980,CVE-2008-4005,CVE-2008-2625,CVE-2008-3990,CVE-2008-3991 Oracle Database是一款商业性质大型数据库系统。 Oracle发布了2008年7月的紧急补丁更新公告,修复了多个Oracle产品中的多个漏洞。这些漏洞影响Oracle产品的所有安全属性,可导致本地和远程的威胁。其中一些漏洞可能需要各种级别的授权,但也有些不需要任何授权。最严重的漏洞可能导致完全入侵数据库系统。目前已知的漏洞包括: BEA WebLogic Workshop中有关NetUI标签的漏洞可能导致信息泄露。 BEA WebLogic Server在使用多个授权者(如XACMLAuthorizer和DefaultAuthorizer)时的错误可能允许绕过某些安全限制。 Apache的WebLogic插件中的错误可能导致完全的系统入侵。 将Bea WebLogic Server 8.1SP3升级到更高版本可能导致无效用户可以使用之前受保护的应用。成功攻击要求使用了CLIENT-CERT认证方式。 Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.3 Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.4.0 Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.0.0 Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.3.0 Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.2.0 Oracle E-Business Suite 12.0.4 Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 Oracle Database 9.2.0.8DV Oracle Database 9.2.0.8 Oracle Database 11.1.0.6 Oracle Database 10.2.0.4 Oracle Database 10.2.0.3 Oracle Database 10.2.0.2 Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools 8.98 Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools 8.97 Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools 8.49.14 Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools 8.48.18 Oracle WebLogic Server 9.2 Oracle WebLogic Server 9.1 Oracle WebLogic Server 9.0 Oracle WebLogic Server 8.1 Oracle WebLogic Server 7.0 Oracle WebLogic Server 6.1 Oracle WebLogic Server 10.0 Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise Portal 9.0 Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise Portal 8.9 Oracle Workshop for WebLogic 9.2 Oracle Workshop for WebLogic 9.1 Oracle Workshop for WebLogic 9.0 Oracle Workshop for WebLogic 8.1 Oracle Workshop for WebLogic 10.3 GA Oracle Workshop for WebLogic 10.2 GA Oracle Workshop for WebLogic 10.0 厂商补丁: Oracle ------ Oracle已经为此发布了一个安全公告(cpuoct2008)以及相应补丁: cpuoct2008:Oracle Critical Patch Update Advisory - October 2008 链接:<a href=http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuoct2008.html?_template=/o target=_blank>http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/critical-patch-updates/cpuoct2008.html?_template=/o</a> |
id | SSV:4264 |
last seen | 2017-11-19 |
modified | 2008-10-20 |
published | 2008-10-20 |
reporter | Root |
title | Oracle 2008年10月紧急补丁更新修复多个漏洞 |