Vulnerabilities > CVE-2007-5944 - Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in IBM Websphere Application Server

047910
CVSS 4.3 - MEDIUM
Attack vector
NETWORK
Attack complexity
MEDIUM
Privileges required
NONE
Confidentiality impact
NONE
Integrity impact
PARTIAL
Availability impact
NONE
network
ibm
CWE-79
nessus
exploit available
NVD
Published: 2007-11-14
Updated: 2011-03-08

Summary

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Servlet Engine / Web Container in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 5.1.1.4 through 5.1.1.16 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Expect HTTP header. NOTE: this might be the same issue as CVE-2006-3918, but there are insufficient details to be sure.

Vulnerable Configurations

Part Description Count
Application
Ibm
13

Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC)

  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Embedding Scripts in Non-Script Elements
    This attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where malicious scripts are embedded in elements that are not expected to host scripts such as image tags (<img>), comments in XML documents (< !-CDATA->), etc. These tags may not be subject to the same input validation, output validation, and other content filtering and checking routines, so this can create an opportunity for an attacker to tunnel through the application's elements and launch a XSS attack through other elements. As with all remote attacks, it is important to differentiate the ability to launch an attack (such as probing an internal network for unpatched servers) and the ability of the remote attacker to collect and interpret the output of said attack.
  • Embedding Scripts within Scripts
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute scripts. The attacker leverages this capability to execute scripts to execute his/her own script by embedding it within other scripts that the target software is likely to execute. The attacker must have the ability to inject script into script that is likely to be executed. If this is done, then the attacker can potentially launch a variety of probes and attacks against the web server's local environment, in many cases the so-called DMZ, back end resources the web server can communicate with, and other hosts. With the proliferation of intermediaries, such as Web App Firewalls, network devices, and even printers having JVMs and Web servers, there are many locales where an attacker can inject malicious scripts. Since this attack pattern defines scripts within scripts, there are likely privileges to execute said attack on the host. Of course, these attacks are not solely limited to the server side, client side scripts like Ajax and client side JavaScript can contain malicious scripts as well. In general all that is required is for there to be sufficient privileges to execute a script, but not protected against writing.
  • Cross-Site Scripting in Error Pages
    An attacker distributes a link (or possibly some other query structure) with a request to a third party web server that is malformed and also contains a block of exploit code in order to have the exploit become live code in the resulting error page. When the third party web server receives the crafted request and notes the error it then creates an error message that echoes the malformed message, including the exploit. Doing this converts the exploit portion of the message into to valid language elements that are executed by the viewing browser. When a victim executes the query provided by the attacker the infected error message error message is returned including the exploit code which then runs in the victim's browser. XSS can result in execution of code as well as data leakage (e.g. session cookies can be sent to the attacker). This type of attack is especially dangerous since the exploit appears to come from the third party web server, who the victim may trust and hence be more vulnerable to deception.
  • Cross-Site Scripting Using Alternate Syntax
    The attacker uses alternate forms of keywords or commands that result in the same action as the primary form but which may not be caught by filters. For example, many keywords are processed in a case insensitive manner. If the site's web filtering algorithm does not convert all tags into a consistent case before the comparison with forbidden keywords it is possible to bypass filters (e.g., incomplete black lists) by using an alternate case structure. For example, the "script" tag using the alternate forms of "Script" or "ScRiPt" may bypass filters where "script" is the only form tested. Other variants using different syntax representations are also possible as well as using pollution meta-characters or entities that are eventually ignored by the rendering engine. The attack can result in the execution of otherwise prohibited functionality.

Exploit-Db

descriptionIBM WebSphere Application Server 5.1.1 WebContainer HTTP Request Header Security Weakness. CVE-2007-5944. Remote exploits for multiple platform
idEDB-ID:30768
last seen2016-02-03
modified2007-11-15
published2007-11-15
reporteranonymous
sourcehttps://www.exploit-db.com/download/30768/
titleIBM WebSphere Application Server 5.1.1 WebContainer HTTP Request Header Security Weakness

Nessus

NASL familyCGI abuses : XSS
NASL idWWW_EXPECT_XSS.NASL
descriptionThe remote web server fails to sanitize the contents of an
last seen2020-06-01
modified2020-06-02
plugin id22254
published2006-08-23
reporterThis script is Copyright (C) 2006-2018 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.
sourcehttps://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/22254
titleWeb Server Expect Header XSS
code
#
# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.
#

include("compat.inc");

if (description)
{
  script_id(22254);
  script_version("1.31");
  script_cvs_date("Date: 2018/11/15 20:50:20");

  script_cve_id("CVE-2006-3918", "CVE-2007-5944");
  script_bugtraq_id(19661, 26457);

  script_name(english:"Web Server Expect Header XSS");
  script_summary(english:"Checks for an XSS flaw involving Expect Headers");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote web server is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting attack.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The remote web server fails to sanitize the contents of an 'Expect'
request header before using it to generate dynamic web content.  An
unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able to leverage this issue to
launch cross-site scripting attacks against the affected service,
perhaps through specially crafted ShockWave (SWF) files.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2006/May/150");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2006/May/440");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2006/Jul/423");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.2");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.0");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_1.3");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PK24631");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24017314");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Check with the vendor for an update to the web server.  For Apache,
the issue is reportedly fixed by versions 1.3.35 / 2.0.57 / 2.2.2; for
IBM HTTP Server, upgrade to 6.0.2.13 / 6.1.0.1; for IBM WebSphere
Application Server, upgrade to 5.1.1.17.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N");
  script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2006-3918");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No exploit is required");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");
  script_cwe_id(79);

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2006/05/08");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2006/08/23");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"potential_vulnerability", value:"true");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"remote");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploited_by_nessus", value:"true");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_ATTACK);
  script_family(english:"CGI abuses : XSS");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2006-2018 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");

  script_dependencies("find_service2.nasl", "http_version.nasl");
  script_require_keys("Settings/ParanoidReport");
  script_require_ports("Services/www", 80);

  exit(0);
}


include("audit.inc");
include("global_settings.inc");
include("misc_func.inc");
include("http.inc");
include("raw.inc");

if (report_paranoia < 2) audit(AUDIT_PARANOID);

if (islocalhost() ) exit(0, "Nessus can not test for the issue over the loopback interface.");

port = get_http_port(default:80);
if ( get_port_transport(port) != ENCAPS_IP ) exit(0, "This script only works for HTTP connections");

soc = open_sock_tcp(port);
if (!soc) audit(AUDIT_SOCK_FAIL, port);


# Generate a request to exploit the flaw.
exploit = SCRIPT_NAME + " testing for BID 19661 <test>";
rq = http_mk_get_req(port: port, item: "/", add_headers: make_array("Expect", exploit));
buf = http_mk_buffer_from_req(req: rq);
if ( buf == NULL ) audit(AUDIT_FN_FAIL, "http_mk_buffer_from_req");

# Send the request but don't worry about the response.
filter = "tcp and "
 + "src host " + get_host_ip() + " and "
 + "src port " + port + " and "
 + "dst port " + get_source_port(soc);
res = send_capture(socket:soc, data:buf, pcap_filter:filter);
if (res == NULL) audit(AUDIT_RESP_NOT, port);
flags = get_tcp_element(tcp:res, element:"th_flags");
if (flags & TH_ACK == 0) exit(0, "The TCP response from the web server on port "+port+" was not an ACK.");


# Half-close the connection.
#
# nb: the server sends a 417 response only after the connection is
#     closed; a half-close allows us to receive the response.
ip = ip();
seq = get_tcp_element(tcp:res, element:"th_ack");
tcp = tcp(
  th_dport : port,
  th_sport : get_source_port(soc),
  th_seq   : seq,
  th_ack   : seq,
  th_win   : get_tcp_element(tcp:res, element:"th_win"),
  th_flags : TH_FIN|TH_ACK
);
halfclose = mkpacket(ip, tcp);
r = send_packet(halfclose, pcap_filter:filter, pcap_timeout:5);
if ( !isnull(r) && ("417 Expectation Failed" >< r ||
		    "417 invalid Expect header value:" >< r ) )
{
 res2 = strstr(r, "417 Expectation Failed");
 if ( isnull(res2) ) res2 = strstr(r, "417 invalid Expect header value:");
}


# There's a problem if we see our exploit in the response.
res = recv(socket:soc, length:1024);
close(soc);

if ( isnull(res)) res = res2;

if (
  res &&
  (
    "417 Expectation Failed" >< res ||
    "417 invalid Expect header value:" >< res
  ) &&
  exploit >< res
)
{
  set_kb_item(name:'www/'+port+'/XSS', value:TRUE);

  if (report_verbosity > 0)
  {
    report = '\n'
      + 'Nessus was able to exploit the issue using the following request :\n'
      + '\n'
      + crap(data:"-", length:30) + " snip " + crap(data:"-", length:30)+'\n'
      + http_mk_buffer_from_req(req:rq)
      + crap(data:"-", length:30) + " snip " + crap(data:"-", length:30)+ '\n';

    security_warning(port:port, extra:report);
  }
  else security_warning(port);
  exit(0);
}
else audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, 'affected');

References