Vulnerabilities
| DATE | CVE | VULNERABILITY TITLE | RISK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-45088 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.3 IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.3 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. | 5.4 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11070 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Publiccms 5.202406.D A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Sanluan PublicCMS 5.202406.d. | 5.4 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-50263 | Unspecified vulnerability in Linux Kernel In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fork: only invoke khugepaged, ksm hooks if no error There is no reason to invoke these hooks early against an mm that is in an incomplete state. The change in commit d24062914837 ("fork: use __mt_dup() to duplicate maple tree in dup_mmap()") makes this more pertinent as we may be in a state where entries in the maple tree are not yet consistent. Their placement early in dup_mmap() only appears to have been meaningful for early error checking, and since functionally it'd require a very small allocation to fail (in practice 'too small to fail') that'd only occur in the most dire circumstances, meaning the fork would fail or be OOM'd in any case. Since both khugepaged and KSM tracking are there to provide optimisations to memory performance rather than critical functionality, it doesn't really matter all that much if, under such dire memory pressure, we fail to register an mm with these. As a result, we follow the example of commit d2081b2bf819 ("mm: khugepaged: make khugepaged_enter() void function") and make ksm_fork() a void function also. We only expose the mm to these functions once we are done with them and only if no error occurred in the fork operation. | 5.5 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11021 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Vice Webopac 7.1.20160701 Webopac from Grand Vice info has Stored Cross-site Scripting vulnerability. | 5.4 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11062 | OS Command Injection vulnerability in Dlink Dsl6740C Firmware The D-Link DSL6740C modem has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with administrator privileges to inject and execute arbitrary system commands through a specific functionality provided by SSH and Telnet. | 7.2 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11063 | OS Command Injection vulnerability in Dlink Dsl6740C Firmware The D-Link DSL6740C modem has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with administrator privileges to inject and execute arbitrary system commands through a specific functionality provided by SSH and Telnet. | 7.2 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11064 | OS Command Injection vulnerability in Dlink Dsl6740C Firmware The D-Link DSL6740C modem has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with administrator privileges to inject and execute arbitrary system commands through a specific functionality provided by SSH and Telnet. | 7.2 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11065 | OS Command Injection vulnerability in Dlink Dsl6740C Firmware The D-Link DSL6740C modem has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing remote attackers with administrator privileges to inject and execute arbitrary system commands through a specific functionality provided by SSH and Telnet. | 7.2 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11016 | SQL Injection vulnerability in Vice Webopac 7.1.20160701 Webopac from Grand Vice info has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attacks to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents. | 9.8 |
| 2024-11-11 | CVE-2024-11019 | Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Vice Webopac 7.1.20160701 Webopac from Grand Vice info has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the user's browser through phishing techniques. | 6.1 |